was the "i'm not dorian nakamoto" post geniune ?

[toinew]

there has been a fuss around the fact that many think its not him writing the "im not dorian nakamoto"
any news on that ?

also, do you think nsa has the ability to know who is satoshi nakamoto if nsa really wanted to know it ?

[1713483953]

1713483953

[1713483953]

1713483953

[seriouscoin]

who gives a shit, go back to being a hater pls.

[franky1]

there has been a fuss around the fact that many think its not him writing the "im not dorian nakamoto"
any news on that ?

also, do you think nsa has the ability to know who is satoshi nakamoto if nsa really wanted to know it ?

the username that was talking in 2008 and inventing bitcoin was the exact same username that said ' i am not dorian nakamoto', but no one can of course confirm or deny the face behind the keyboard that typed it. but anyone spouting fud that it was a mis-spelled username and not the username.. is simply wrong.

bitcoin is open source, the white paper is public record and all correspondence are in the publicdomain (forum messages have been logged) so there are no secrets about bitcoin.

if the NSA wanted to go after anyone it would be gavin andressen. and if anyone wants to know more about bitcoin and stuff gavin would know it all. so whats the point in trying to find 'satoshi'

[EFS]

so whats the point in trying to find 'satoshi'

To hijack first 1 million coins?

"i am not dorian nakamoto" is written by real satoshi account. It doesn't matter who write it. It also doesn't matter who is the real satoshi, as long as first blocks remain unspent. That's the beauty of open source and Bitcoin.

[BitcoinBarrel]

I'd like to believe that it is. If it was a hacked account why wouldn't they abuse it a little more and ask for donations?

[Omikifuse]

Why would someone who cares so much about  privacy, with good reasons, gives his own surname to his internet top secret identity ?

Wouldn't make any sense.

Ths is why I believe the message is legit.

[bitllionaire]

the username of 2009 is the same that the username of the 2014 message
It is hardly difficult that it is not genuine

[ebliever]

Occam's Razor says that the "I am not Dorian Nakamoto" post was genuine, until someone comes up with some concrete evidence to the contrary.

[QuestionAuthority]

You will be able to tell when Bitcoin is failing because the owner or owners of the first million coins will begin to sell them.

[ArticMine]

You will be able to tell when Bitcoin is failing because the owner or owners of the first million coins will begin to sell them.

This can happen if all of the following are true:
1) Satoshi is an individual
2) Satoshi dies
3) Upon death there is a tax liability due. This can be either capital gains upon death, estate taxes or both.
4) Satoshi's estate sells the XBT in order to pay the tax liability.

[waldox]

i believe dorian is not satoshi
and that post is by the real satoshi

[AGD]

He didn't sign that message. So if he really wanted everybody to believe that he was the "real" Satoshi Nakamoto he definitely would have signed the message. If he was still alive he would know about the importance to sign the message as a proof for all the "crypto guys" to believe it was him.
Both, the unspent fortune plus the unsigned message (you can't sign a message when you don't have the private key) is leading to the death of Satoshi Nakamoto.

The sudden end of his writings was happening just after the CIA had raised interest and got involved in Bitcoin. Could be coincidence, but also could point to the reason of his disappearance.

The message could have been dropped for everybody to believe, that at the time of that message he was alive. No key, no sign, no proof, so to me Satoshi is still dead. R.I.P.

[gtraah]

Someone admitted that they faked that message with a fake account on that site. Cant remember who and where it wasa but I was shocked as shit and kept search searching until I found this guy admitting it was him that did it as a Joke as he was shitty that everyone beleived that dorian was satoshi, when it CLEARY wasnt

[bornil267645]

No, I don't think it was genuine...

[Swordsoffreedom]

there has been a fuss around the fact that many think its not him writing the "im not dorian nakamoto"
any news on that ?

also, do you think nsa has the ability to know who is satoshi nakamoto if nsa really wanted to know it ?

In my opinion yes that was a real post from Satoshi, short concise and to the point
If I recall the P2Pfoundation website never got back with a report of the details of Satoshi logging in though.
Anyways no real need to sign a message he wants to remain anon and keeps track of whats going on in Bitcoin as an observer.

[s.mouse]

I'm sceptical. Why wouldn't he have posted here or signed a message?

[ensurance982]

Well the NSA could be interested in hiring Satoshi. Hell, maybe they even already did, or at least tries He seems to be a very very smart person, so why not. But apart from the conspiracy theories, I guess Satoshi just wanted to make sure people know he isn't Dorian.

[CryptoDomains]

He is not that smart, if he were smart he would accept that we all have an expiry date and would enjoy the money. People who have issues with enjoying their success have psychological issues and are not some great humanitarian. jmo

He may be brilliant but he is also a socially challenged self loathing individual or maybe so self righteous he cannot damage his rep by spending a dollar.

Meh, either way a nutty guy, if a person at all.

[minerpumpkin]

We can't know for sure I guess, but I do believe that it's genuine! Seems to show that Satoshi is still at least watching his experiment and saw the need to interfere when that report was published. I think it was a good 'gesture'!

[justbtcme]

Satoshi is probably looking at the price of BTC right now and kicking himself for not backing up his private keys