Bitcoin Forum
August 21, 2018, 12:39:28 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 [124]
  Print  
Author Topic: [170PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN  (Read 95690 times)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1293


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
August 19, 2018, 11:46:00 PM
 #2461

It is 745pm here in New Jersey  gives me more then 4 hours to do 3 in a day

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
1534811968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534811968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534811968
Reply with quote  #2

1534811968
Report to moderator
1534811968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534811968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534811968
Reply with quote  #2

1534811968
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1534811968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534811968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534811968
Reply with quote  #2

1534811968
Report to moderator
grinbuck
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 06:46:52 AM
 #2462

I've got about 70 Th of power and I'm looking desperately to improve the profitability of my S9's for obvious reasons.

I have no problems with variance. I'm quite patient. It's the returns I'm after.

 I don't have the guts to try solo mining with my measly hashrate but I LOVE the idea that IN CASE my little litter finds a high difficulty share, i'm rewarded proportionately higher. From my understanding standard PPLNS does not offer this.

Few questions:

1) Am I right about the fact that standard PPLNS doesn't give you proportionately higher rewards for finding shares of higher difficulty?
2) Does CKPool (not solo) pay out higher if I'm lucky and find shares of higher difficulty? Is it worth the wait in terms of variance?
3) Am I too small a player to be consistently paid? I mean I don't want to wait for blocks on end till the revolving 50 tail enders are paid.

Any input greatly appreciated.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1123


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 20, 2018, 07:09:19 AM
 #2463

I've got about 70 Th of power and I'm looking desperately to improve the profitability of my S9's for obvious reasons.

I have no problems with variance. I'm quite patient. It's the returns I'm after.

 I don't have the guts to try solo mining with my measly hashrate but I LOVE the idea that IN CASE my little litter finds a high difficulty share, i'm rewarded proportionately higher. From my understanding standard PPLNS does not offer this.

Few questions:

1) Am I right about the fact that standard PPLNS doesn't give you proportionately higher rewards for finding shares of higher difficulty?
2) Does CKPool (not solo) pay out higher if I'm lucky and find shares of higher difficulty? Is it worth the wait in terms of variance?
3) Am I too small a player to be consistently paid? I mean I don't want to wait for blocks on end till the revolving 50 tail enders are paid.

Any input greatly appreciated.
1. Yes
2. But they're so small it's only relevant to minuscule miners. At your size it will even out in no time
3. At 70TH it puts you in the top 50 miners and after mining here for a few days you will be getting payouts with every block.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
grinbuck
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 09:48:31 AM
 #2464

I've got about 70 Th of power and I'm looking desperately to improve the profitability of my S9's for obvious reasons.

I have no problems with variance. I'm quite patient. It's the returns I'm after.

 I don't have the guts to try solo mining with my measly hashrate but I LOVE the idea that IN CASE my little litter finds a high difficulty share, i'm rewarded proportionately higher. From my understanding standard PPLNS does not offer this.

Few questions:

1) Am I right about the fact that standard PPLNS doesn't give you proportionately higher rewards for finding shares of higher difficulty?
2) Does CKPool (not solo) pay out higher if I'm lucky and find shares of higher difficulty? Is it worth the wait in terms of variance?
3) Am I too small a player to be consistently paid? I mean I don't want to wait for blocks on end till the revolving 50 tail enders are paid.

Any input greatly appreciated.
1. Yes
2. But they're so small it's only relevant to minuscule miners. At your size it will even out in no time
3. At 70TH it puts you in the top 50 miners and after mining here for a few days you will be getting payouts with every block.

Thanks CK. Smiley
Fugio
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 5


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 02:59:33 PM
 #2465

Back under 100PH  Sad  Fewer blocks, higher pay outs  Undecided
pavesi
Jr. Member
*
Online Online

Activity: 37
Merit: 7


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 03:09:05 PM
 #2466

Back under 100PH  Sad  Fewer blocks, higher pay outs  Undecided

That's weird.. I still see 172ph listed as pool hashrate..
Fugio
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 5


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 03:11:49 PM
 #2467

Back under 100PH  Sad  Fewer blocks, higher pay outs  Undecided

That's weird.. I still see 172ph listed as pool hashrate..

Look at the 1 and 5 minute rates on the dashboard http://ckpool.org/#/dashboard
pavesi
Jr. Member
*
Online Online

Activity: 37
Merit: 7


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 03:49:45 PM
 #2468

Back under 100PH  Sad  Fewer blocks, higher pay outs  Undecided

That's weird.. I still see 172ph listed as pool hashrate..

Look at the 1 and 5 minute rates on the dashboard http://ckpool.org/#/dashboard

gotcha.. 115ph now.. and going up.. maybe just halong/inno just taking testing units off shelves and replacing..


minefarmbuy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 19

We are not retail.


View Profile WWW
August 20, 2018, 04:45:19 PM
 #2469

Burn in's and shipouts I guess? Wasn't too worried about waiting a little longer to celebrate. Just makes it all more exciting/fun when we do hit a block.

gcanelson
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 5


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 05:31:57 PM
 #2470

Back under 100PH  Sad  Fewer blocks, higher pay outs  Undecided

That's weird.. I still see 172ph listed as pool hashrate..

Look at the 1 and 5 minute rates on the dashboard http://ckpool.org/#/dashboard
gotcha.. 115ph now.. and going up.. maybe just halong/inno just taking testing units off shelves and replacing..
1 minute rate just broke 200... it's a really small (too small) sample size of course, but we're back to normal...
Happy hashing...
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1293


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 07:39:00 PM
 #2471

my innosilicon t2turbo  has arrived.

shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase

go to bottom of this link

http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr


 "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
   "hashrate1m": "21.8T",
   "hashrate5m": "17T",
   "hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
   "hashrate1d": "125G",
   "hashrate7d": "17.9G",
   "lastshare": 1534794072,
   "shares": 2534795,
   "bestshare": 4768300.0,
   "lns": 2533888.463873493,
   "luck": 1.05,
   "herp": 2649546.48057697
  }

   It is on factory setting  doing 21.8   and about 2085 watts or  95.6 watts a th  Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune

the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want  unless of course  gear was doing 28 or 30 th.

I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like

unit is doing about 17.6  to 18.4 th so  79.03 watts a th at best   and 82.78 watts a th at worst.  these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
minefarmbuy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 19

We are not retail.


View Profile WWW
August 20, 2018, 08:31:29 PM
 #2472

my innosilicon t2turbo  has arrived.

shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase

go to bottom of this link

http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr


 "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
   "hashrate1m": "21.8T",
   "hashrate5m": "17T",
   "hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
   "hashrate1d": "125G",
   "hashrate7d": "17.9G",
   "lastshare": 1534794072,
   "shares": 2534795,
   "bestshare": 4768300.0,
   "lns": 2533888.463873493,
   "luck": 1.05,
   "herp": 2649546.48057697
  }

   It is on factory setting  doing 21.8   and about 2085 watts or  95.6 watts a th  Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune

the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want  unless of course  gear was doing 28 or 30 th.

I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like

unit is doing about 17.6  to 18.4 th so  79.03 watts a th at best   and 82.78 watts a th at worst.  these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts

Looks promising, excited for the unit review. I should have my exhaust upgrade done this month, work to get a pdu, and start adding a unit in a couple more. I want to close in on 100th by year end. . . I hopes.

philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1293


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 09:27:10 PM
 #2473

my innosilicon t2turbo  has arrived.

shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase

go to bottom of this link

http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr


 "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
   "hashrate1m": "21.8T",
   "hashrate5m": "17T",
   "hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
   "hashrate1d": "125G",
   "hashrate7d": "17.9G",
   "lastshare": 1534794072,
   "shares": 2534795,
   "bestshare": 4768300.0,
   "lns": 2533888.463873493,
   "luck": 1.05,
   "herp": 2649546.48057697
  }

   It is on factory setting  doing 21.8   and about 2085 watts or  95.6 watts a th  Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune

the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want  unless of course  gear was doing 28 or 30 th.

I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like

unit is doing about 17.6  to 18.4 th so  79.03 watts a th at best   and 82.78 watts a th at worst.  these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts

Looks promising, excited for the unit review. I should have my exhaust upgrade done this month, work to get a pdu, and start adding a unit in a couple more. I want to close in on 100th by year end. . . I hopes.


yeah it appears to be a really nice unit I will be getting another tomorrow.

Be sure to give me your link in a pm for referral.


efficiency mode has stayed in the 1444 to 1457 watt mode at my meter

and about 17.2 to 18.4 th.

I was hoping for a little better power number but i have multiple meters and will test them all.

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1123


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 20, 2018, 09:41:20 PM
 #2474

  It is on factory setting  doing 21.8   and about 2085 watts or  95.6 watts a th  Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune

the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want  unless of course  gear was doing 28 or 30 th.

I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like

unit is doing about 17.6  to 18.4 th so  79.03 watts a th at best   and 82.78 watts a th at worst.  these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.)

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1293


Avalon 841 rocks


View Profile
August 20, 2018, 10:07:52 PM
 #2475

  It is on factory setting  doing 21.8   and about 2085 watts or  95.6 watts a th  Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune

the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want  unless of course  gear was doing 28 or 30 th.

I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like

unit is doing about 17.6  to 18.4 th so  79.03 watts a th at best   and 82.78 watts a th at worst.  these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.)

Well  its simple selling gear that is set to blow up the psu makes them more money or so they think.

Your firmware is why I still own my 5 T's

and It is why I purchased  the T2 Turbo model.


If you have a hundred or two hundred units in a cold place and really cheap  power you can gamble that the faster settings will pay off.

If coins spike like mad you can also push the machines.


But when margins are tight   or the weather is hot  the efficiency and balance settings are really good.

I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net...
I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
minefarmbuy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 19

We are not retail.


View Profile WWW
August 20, 2018, 10:13:31 PM
 #2476

For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.)

This is pretty note worthy. This was for the T2T or back with with DM T1?


yeah it appears to be a really nice unit I will be getting another tomorrow.

Be sure to give me your link in a pm for referral.


efficiency mode has stayed in the 1444 to 1457 watt mode at my meter

and about 17.2 to 18.4 th.

I was hoping for a little better power number but i have multiple meters and will test them all.

Awesome, just click on a link to the site from bitcoinhackers.org or twitter post and just run through the order or use the same window to request a btc quote. I get 0.05% from the 2% commission they charge if a sale is earned, mfb get's the greatest (objectively) social marketer.

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1123


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 20, 2018, 10:21:38 PM
 #2477

For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.)

This is pretty note worthy. This was for the T2T or back with with DM T1?
I only ever worked on the T1, they used the same starting code for T2 - which I only ever tested remotely - and presumably T2T. I've had nothing to do with Inno since then. There's a reason my coding for the hardware was intense for a couple of months and then stopped abruptly. The relationship between myrig, halong and inno is complicated and strained, to say the least, but I'm not informed of all the details and neither do I want to be. Inno did ask me to help "advertise" their hardware, which I refused to do. That's clearly not something I would ever do for any manufacturer anyway.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
minefarmbuy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 19

We are not retail.


View Profile WWW
August 20, 2018, 10:37:47 PM
 #2478

I only ever worked on the T1, they used the same starting code for T2 - which I only ever tested remotely - and presumably T2T. I've had nothing to do with Inno since then. There's a reason my coding for the hardware was intense for a couple of months and then stopped abruptly. The relationship between myrig, halong and inno is complicated and strained, to say the least, but I'm not informed of all the details and neither do I want to be. Inno did ask me to help "advertise" their hardware, which I refused to do. That's clearly not something I would ever do for any manufacturer anyway.

Yea, shilling is a fine line anyway. You would want sales persons/marketers to do that not someone writing software/coding. I've always wondered about the happenings cause it was great to see Halong take off for a minute but seems a lot may have gotten missed with three separate entities trying to work fluidly, harmoniously through one project.

Pages: « 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 [124]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!