Bitcoin Forum
December 16, 2024, 12:20:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Incredibly high volume on BTC-e - Bot gone crazy?  (Read 2385 times)
peeveepee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 31, 2014, 07:18:36 PM
 #21

In time of big fluctuation, increase volume is expected as some think it is a bargain to buy at cheaper price.

And if selling continue, the recent buyer might just suddenly turn bearish and sell what they just bought and further increase more volume and bigger drop in price.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4522
Merit: 3427



View Profile
August 31, 2014, 08:01:18 PM
 #22

LTC/USD volume was also extremely high. It could have been an arbitrage play, or perhaps two dueling arbitrage bots.



The guy that wrote that article has no idea. He makes it seem like he knows, but he is just guessing like everyone else.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
davida
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 585
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 31, 2014, 09:05:32 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2014, 10:25:47 PM by davida
 #23

Btc-e past 24hr trade volume: 40,000btc

btc-e normal 24hr trade volume: ~4000 btc

Therefore, estimated extra volume:   40,000 - 4000 =  36,000btc extra traded

If we assume this was 2 malfunctioning bots, and with a trade fee of 0.2%, this would mean the wallet balance of the bot would only needed to contain 0.2% (1/500th) of the extra 36,000btc traded.

36,000 x 0.2% = 72btc

So from this calculation, if the malfunctioning bot theory is true then someone has just lost about 72btc... Although, I'm not to sure about that. Would it really have continued for over a day?


Another theory/possibility is that this trading was intentional, perhaps by a big whale trying to cause panic and a price crash before buying back in at lower price.  Although, for this be profitable you would have to first recoup the 72btc I calculated above.

So.... 72btc x $500 = $36,000 . Let's assume $36,000 was lost in fees to btc-e

As the price has only fallen $20 (4%), down to $480 since the "attack" started, this trader/manipulator would have to buy at least 1875btc ($900,000) worth of bitcoin to just marginally benefit from the new lower price he created, and to buy this quantity he would push the price right back up to above $500.  

Maybe they thought their actions would have a much stronger impact on the market price?? Or, maybe I'm completely wrong!
minerpumpkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night


View Profile
August 31, 2014, 09:11:36 PM
 #24

Btc-e past 24hr trade volume: 40,000btc

btc-e normal 24hr trade volume: ~4000 btc

Therefore, estimated extra volume:   40,000 - 4000 =  36,000btc extra traded

If we assume this was 2 malfunctioning bots, and with a trade fee of 0.2%, this would mean the wallet balance of the bot would only needed to contain 0.2% (1/500th) of the extra 36,000btc traded.

36,000 x 0.2% = 72btc

So from this calculation, if the malfunctioning bot theory is true then someone has just lost about 72btc... Although, I'm not to sure about that. Would it really have continued for over a day?


Another theory/possibility is that this trading was intentional, perhaps by a big whale trying to cause panic and a price crash before buying back in at lower price.  Although, for this be profitable you would have to first recoup the 72btc I calculated above.

So.... 72btc x $500 = $36,000 . Let's assume $36,000 was lost in fees to btc-e

As the price has only fallen $20 (4%), down to $480 since the "attack" started, this trader/manipulator would have to buy at least 1875btc ($900,000) worth of bitcoin to just marginally benefit from the new lower price he created, and to buy this quantity he would push the price right back up to above $500.   

Maybe they thought there actions would have a much stronger impact on the market price?? Or, maybe I'm completely wrong!






Nice theories! I guess they may be true, but I think it's even more probable that it is some BTC-e-internal bot trying to get the trading volume higher in order to get more exposure for BTC-e (which they accomplished) and also appear in the first slot on Bitcoinity!

I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
davida
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 585
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 31, 2014, 09:18:16 PM
 #25

Nice theories! I guess they may be true, but I think it's even more probable that it is some BTC-e-internal bot trying to get the trading volume higher in order to get more exposure for BTC-e (which they accomplished) and also appear in the first slot on Bitcoinity!


If it were btc-e simply trying to boost trade volume i would expect it to build up much more naturally. Otherwise I really can't see how they would benefit from pulling a stunt like this!!!
minerpumpkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night


View Profile
August 31, 2014, 09:20:23 PM
 #26

Nice theories! I guess they may be true, but I think it's even more probable that it is some BTC-e-internal bot trying to get the trading volume higher in order to get more exposure for BTC-e (which they accomplished) and also appear in the first slot on Bitcoinity!


If it were btc-e simply trying to boost trade volume i would expect it to build up much more naturally. Otherwise I really can't see how they would benefit from pulling a stunt like this!!!

Yeah, that's what I - amongst a few others here - thought as well, but then again does it matter? Do the people over at BTC-e care usually? I guess the Mere Exposure Effect applies in any case! (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mere-exposure_effect)

I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
davida
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 585
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 31, 2014, 09:26:58 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2014, 10:32:13 PM by davida
 #27

If you look at the Fibonacci fan lines from high of $668.42 down to $309 on the btc-e chart, it is quite obvious that if the price had remained above $500 for another 12-24 hours then the price would have broke through the final line.  (and there was some pretty strong resistance at $500 before that strange trading began). 

EDIT: Also I was just looking at the bitstamp chart, the fibonacci fan from high of $683.86 down to $442 was also approaching a crucial moment, the 38.2% retracement.     This trading happened at a pivotal moment in both bitstamp and btc-e price. Make of it what you will.
hikedoon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 143
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 31, 2014, 11:16:22 PM
 #28

  Thank you bot or whale.
   Just bought 1 BTC at $480 . I hope the price drops a wee bit more.  Grin
bigasic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 31, 2014, 11:18:15 PM
 #29

When I last looked btc-e had over 40k bitcoin transactions, thats fucking huge for them. bitstamp had like 9k.. what the hell is going on? some major dumpers and some major buyers... Something is going on...
Beliathon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
August 31, 2014, 11:46:46 PM
 #30

When I last looked btc-e had over 40k bitcoin transactions, thats fucking huge for them. bitstamp had like 9k.. what the hell is going on? some major dumpers and some major buyers... Something is going on...
Just your run of the mill whale market manipulation. Nothing to be concerned about really, the game remains the same for us plebs.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!