Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 11:17:43 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin Core Developer says Bitcoin Too Fragile and in its Infancy  (Read 5006 times)
wasserman99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 14, 2014, 06:37:18 PM
 #81

Mike Hearn is also the guy that is proposing to build blacklisting into Tor, as well as reduce the fungibility of Bitcoin with built in taint tracking and rejection.

What is wrong with a tor node wanting to block something going through their computer and network? It is their connection you're using and are under no obligation to forward any traffic to you in the first place while they risk themselves, and you're still free to use a different node.

Because it's fucking TOR. Why are they operating a TOR node at all if they want to block shit? That's not what TOR is for. They should take their computer and their connection to a different network.
This is correct. TOR is designed to send all data from node to node and from the exit node to it's intended recipient. Exit nodes are not suppose to monitor to look at any of the data that is passing through it. This is part of the TOR protocol.

If an exit node does not follow the protocol then it poses a threat to the overall system and should be excluded excluded from the network, similar to how a bitcoin node that does not follow the protocol.

1715599063
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715599063

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715599063
Reply with quote  #2

1715599063
Report to moderator
1715599063
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715599063

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715599063
Reply with quote  #2

1715599063
Report to moderator
1715599063
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715599063

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715599063
Reply with quote  #2

1715599063
Report to moderator
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715599063
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715599063

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715599063
Reply with quote  #2

1715599063
Report to moderator
1715599063
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715599063

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715599063
Reply with quote  #2

1715599063
Report to moderator
arxwn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2014, 04:10:56 PM
 #82

Mike Hearn is also the guy that is proposing to build blacklisting into Tor, as well as reduce the fungibility of Bitcoin with built in taint tracking and rejection.

What is wrong with a tor node wanting to block something going through their computer and network? It is their connection you're using and are under no obligation to forward any traffic to you in the first place while they risk themselves, and you're still free to use a different node.

Because it's fucking TOR. Why are they operating a TOR node at all if they want to block shit? That's not what TOR is for. They should take their computer and their connection to a different network.
This is correct. TOR is designed to send all data from node to node and from the exit node to it's intended recipient. Exit nodes are not suppose to monitor to look at any of the data that is passing through it. This is part of the TOR protocol.

If an exit node does not follow the protocol then it poses a threat to the overall system and should be excluded excluded from the network, similar to how a bitcoin node that does not follow the protocol.

The TOR papers actually assume that the network is partially compromised. Kind of the trust less part.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!