|
BTC guy (OP)
|
 |
April 19, 2012, 01:43:29 AM |
|
I just got a few 7970 to play with. Im getting 640 hash but i cant get core stable past 1080. Cant drop memory below 900. And im not sure if CGminer or trixx is controlling memory and volts. When i adjust with trixx it shows changes within trixx but not within CGminer. Who here has already played with these and can give me some tips? I hear people talking 1150-1200 core and 700 hash. I would like to get that too if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmg5461
|
|
April 19, 2012, 01:52:56 AM |
|
use afterburner.
Lowest I've gotten mine is .949v ~ 1000mhz w/ 710mhz memory ~ 580mhash/s
Voltage won't change in cgminer. It's bugged. Use Gpu-z to verify the voltage. Also read the asic quality of your 7970's, as that will guide you with overclocking
|
If I've helped: 1CmguJhwW4sbtSMFsyaafikJ8jhYS61quz
Sold: 5850 to lepenguin. Quick, easy and trustworthy.
|
|
|
|
BTC guy (OP)
|
|
April 19, 2012, 01:56:25 AM |
|
Darn i thought i was done with these third party OC tools when i started using CGminer. Thanks for the tip will check out afterburner again.
|
|
|
|
|
BTC guy (OP)
|
|
April 19, 2012, 02:13:09 AM
Last edit: April 19, 2012, 02:48:20 AM by BTC guy |
|
Now running 1125 core 670 hash. Gonna try for 700.
|
|
|
|
|
BTC guy (OP)
|
|
April 19, 2012, 05:02:17 AM
Last edit: April 19, 2012, 07:21:32 AM by BTC guy |
|
Was running 1200 core 720 hash.
|
|
|
|
cyberhelix
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2012, 05:59:14 AM |
|
Now running 1125 core 670 hash. Gonna try for 700.
I have seen 689 out of mine before... everything maxed out. (1125/1375) Good luck on the 700  DiabloMiner Rocks! |
|
|
|
|
|
phorensic
|
|
April 19, 2012, 07:47:18 AM |
|
Just like my 5830's I had a few hundred hours at top speed on my 7970 at a glorious 1200MHz core. Ran a few more weeks at 1175, now I'm down to 1150. It's the crashes in the middle of the night that I don't catch until I wake up that kills the profits. Which means it's better to run at a lower core that is more stable than try to eek out that last 5MH/s. As far as voltage, every time I cranked up voltage I had diminishing returns on clock speed while power usage and heat skyrocketed. I don't recommend touching the voltage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTC guy (OP)
|
|
April 19, 2012, 07:49:25 AM |
|
Your right. I just wanted to see what it could do. I have it running 1100 no volts. I might put a little extra volts for 1150.
|
|
|
|
AzN1337c0d3r
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
April 19, 2012, 11:08:46 PM |
|
The 7970 is incredibly efficient when undervolted but cranking up the voltage does almost nothing for clock speeds and power usage skyrockets. This is due a fundamental physics phenomenon which is related to the way we design transistors and the shrinkage of distance between source and drain called subthreshold leakage.
On a more practical note: My pair of 7970s can hit 1125 MHz at stock volts and generate about 1350 MHash/s.
|
|
|
|
|
