|
Rage19420
|
 |
April 23, 2015, 05:29:26 PM |
|
5880 confirms?  Man im going to grow old waiting for this lol |
|
|
|
|
samspaces
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1030
|
|
April 23, 2015, 06:36:43 PM |
|
I tried sending coins to polo and they are still without any confirmation...
EDIT: From wallet 9.4.0.0
Had this happen too, I sent another small amount and then the previous transaction also got confirmed. |
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
April 23, 2015, 07:09:22 PM |
|
The problem was into my wallet , it showed synced , but wasn't. When I restarted , it synced and confirmation appeared...
|
|
|
|
|
|
5trade
|
|
April 23, 2015, 09:23:14 PM |
|
any pools? arent all blake algo merged?
|
|
|
|
|
g00gsy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
April 23, 2015, 10:12:58 PM |
|
what a crock, i just tried to mine it, but managed a whole 300 submissions over 6 hrs, which got me a whole 2 coins..
asic proof hey, by changing the algo ?, that really works, so normal peoples miners sit dumb until they realize its changed, and then have to reconfigure their miner/s ?
so if asic proof, what explains the small number of miners and the huge hashrate ? a few mega HUGE farms of yours ?
people use this suprnova pool, that has half cut help for miners, that is not helping adoption..
and u call 99 people on a rich list good/fair distribution... youve got to be kidding srsly..
just another pump and dump coin to make another kid some money..
im not mining it, and now im not gonna trade it either on principal...
please stop the joke coins
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
April 23, 2015, 10:34:11 PM |
|
AFAIK the algo hasn't been changed even once yet. The current hashrate is equivalent to only about 100 GPUs mining. |
|
|
|
|
g00gsy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
April 23, 2015, 10:45:00 PM |
|
how do u figure that ? 270GH (40 miners) , my gfx card was pullin 3Mh, what gfx cards can do 2.7Gh  or are they posting crippled miners while using their own miners that do 1000x more hash ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
April 23, 2015, 11:10:34 PM |
|
how do u figure that ? 270GH (40 miners) , my gfx card was pullin 3Mh, what gfx cards can do 2.7Gh or are they posting crippled miners while using their own miners that do 1000x more hash ? R9 290X can do 3 GH on blake. |
|
|
|
|
lookinfoorit
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
April 23, 2015, 11:14:34 PM |
|
Ah, memories....I remember this conversation and thought it should be revisited for a moment.
"Don't complaint if you miss the train."
"from the looks of the two exchanges you have listed market history shows youve sold less than 0.01 BTC worth of your coin in total...lol. looks like we are all missing the train"
"Ok then, it's your choice. I'm saying this now cause later on people fret and all."
Poliniex 24hr Volume: 24.95494655 BTC / 23286982.84627785 HUGE
Alcurex 24h volume: 3837504.68753271 HUGE ( 3.72101902 BTC )
Congrats dev(s) for what you have done so far and well wishes for the future...
|
|
|
|
|
|
slavo
|
|
April 23, 2015, 11:31:49 PM |
|
seems fun i'm buyin
always good to hodl humble projects.
i'd be pleased if the team can get rid of the premine relatively quickly tho; but just do as you feel.
If you want another reliable pool just pm me we'll add you.
cheers and good luck
|
|
|
|
|
e-coinomist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1085
Money often costs too much.
|
|
April 24, 2015, 12:58:47 AM
Last edit: April 24, 2015, 01:21:10 AM by e-coinomist |
|
how do u figure that ? 270GH (40 miners) , my gfx card was pullin 3Mh, what gfx cards can do 2.7Gh or are they posting crippled miners while using their own miners that do 1000x more hash ? R9 290X can do 3 GH on blake. This, and 270GH divided by 40 miners isn't "what gfx cards can do 2.7Gh ??" either people learn how to configure their "my gfx card was pullin 3Mh" better, or it's a math related incapability. Nothing matches here. Well, if an average rig has 2+ GPUs could fit. Altcoin scene seems to be much, much smaller than BTC in average. Just imagine, of 318.900.000 citizens in total, roundabout 40 own an older gaming rig featuring 2+ GPU slots. They use that for mining an Altcoin. Might have even added a new GPU and some riser cables, the usual "ooops I burned down the house" setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
hardforkcoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2015, 02:06:21 AM |
|
any pools? arent all blake algo merged?
No, we got plans to change the algo that's why. |
|
|
|
|
hardforkcoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2015, 02:23:40 AM |
|
what a crock, i just tried to mine it, but managed a whole 300 submissions over 6 hrs, which got me a whole 2 coins..
asic proof hey, by changing the algo ?, that really works, so normal peoples miners sit dumb until they realize its changed, and then have to reconfigure their miner/s ?
so if asic proof, what explains the small number of miners and the huge hashrate ? a few mega HUGE farms of yours ?
people use this suprnova pool, that has half cut help for miners, that is not helping adoption..
and u call 99 people on a rich list good/fair distribution... youve got to be kidding srsly..
just another pump and dump coin to make another kid some money..
im not mining it, and now im not gonna trade it either on principal...
please stop the joke coins
Before changing the algo, the miners will be notified months before, & there will a phase when the wallet will support 2 algos before phasing out the old algo. I'm not going to deny allegation which I can't prove as wrong. Richlist doesn't prove anything. I don't believe it. We'll continue to develop regardless of a pump. |
|
|
|
|
hardforkcoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2015, 02:55:23 AM |
|
how do u figure that ? 270GH (40 miners) , my gfx card was pullin 3Mh, what gfx cards can do 2.7Gh or are they posting crippled miners while using their own miners that do 1000x more hash ? Your setup is broken. Probably you are using the wrong miner. Since I got no experience with mining, take help from the community. Also we're getting 6-7 gh per worker and from what I've seen, you can add multiple gpus in cgminer & that counts as a single thread. |
|
|
|
|
hardforkcoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2015, 02:59:26 AM |
|
Ah, memories....I remember this conversation and thought it should be revisited for a moment.
"Don't complaint if you miss the train."
"from the looks of the two exchanges you have listed market history shows youve sold less than 0.01 BTC worth of your coin in total...lol. looks like we are all missing the train"
"Ok then, it's your choice. I'm saying this now cause later on people fret and all."
Poliniex 24hr Volume: 24.95494655 BTC / 23286982.84627785 HUGE
Alcurex 24h volume: 3837504.68753271 HUGE ( 3.72101902 BTC )
Congrats dev(s) for what you have done so far and well wishes for the future...
Thanks but congratulate us on big features, cause we really don't care about the price and all. |
|
|
|
|
hardforkcoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2015, 03:04:00 AM |
|
seems fun i'm buyin
always good to hodl humble projects.
i'd be pleased if the team can get rid of the premine relatively quickly tho; but just do as you feel.
If you want another reliable pool just pm me we'll add you.
cheers and good luck
There will be a bounty for developing an opensource WP plugin which we'll be using for the website. |
|
|
|
|
gaalx
|
|
April 24, 2015, 04:01:01 AM |
|
with Blake on which algorithm will move? What profit 290 GPU?
|
|
|
|
|
hardforkcoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2015, 05:18:45 AM |
|
with Blake on which algorithm will move? What profit 290 GPU?
Once a blake ASIC is out, then we'll reveal the next algo. |
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
April 24, 2015, 10:33:07 AM |
|
Why change the algorithm that works and is fair? Blake ASIC is not profitable to produce. But x11, x13 and x15 ASIC is already in progress ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
hardforkcoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2015, 01:15:28 PM |
|
Why change the algorithm that works and is fair? Blake ASIC is not profitable to produce. But x11, x13 and x15 ASIC is already in progress ...
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. It'll happen only if an asic is out, but making an asic is easy for blake. |
|
|
|
|
