Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 07:46:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 [1147] 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 ... 2248 »
  Print  
Author Topic: KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2435 blocks  (Read 5349945 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (50 posts by 3+ users deleted.)
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 552


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 04:38:43 PM
 #22921

... It's just there are bad business people not treating their equipment right that make it seem that there is a high failure rate.
AKA hobbyists  Wink

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711655196
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711655196

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711655196
Reply with quote  #2

1711655196
Report to moderator
1711655196
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711655196

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711655196
Reply with quote  #2

1711655196
Report to moderator
pondule
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 05:39:30 PM
 #22922

... It's just there are bad business people not treating their equipment right that make it seem that there is a high failure rate.
AKA hobbyists  Wink

I tripped over the power cable to one of the PSUs running my S9 and it spiked the mains and now that hash board doesn't power up. PSU is still good so I suspect the regulator has died but it's too cold to take it apart because two S7s aren't enough to keep my flat warm.

Is that what you mean by hobbyist? Wink
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 552


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 05:42:10 PM
 #22923

...Is that what you mean by hobbyist? Wink
When I stop lmao, I will answer that.  Tongue

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4074
Merit: 7590


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2017, 06:13:17 PM
Last edit: January 05, 2017, 06:34:10 PM by philipma1957
 #22924

If you are a trucking company would you buy the truck that costs more and need more fuel but drive on the road all the time, making money. And if something is defective you have very good customer service.
Or the one that is cheaper, needs less fuel but you have troubles all the time, you have to argue with the customer service about very cheap spare parts even if you bought hunderts of trucks from them....
...
As for your analogy....
That's so flawed that I don't even know where to begin....
Since 66 is the LCM...
   Unit Cost   Power Usage   TH/s   Power/TH   (kWh) cost USD   Yearly Power Cost/TH   Yearly Power Cost @ 66TH   Purchase Cost for 66TH
A7$1,222.29   1,000.00   6   166.67   $0.10   $146.39   $9,661.87    $13,445.19
S9$1,232.00   1,185.80   11   107.80   $0.10   $94.67   $6,248.40   $7,392.00

Edit: purchase price alone, you could buy 11 S9s (not counting the 1 that the power cost difference makes), throw 5 in the trash (having never used them) and still save $.

your price is  off on the a7  they are $888.00 before shipping not   1,222.29

I paid 2,032 for 2 with 1 controller  so if you use 1016  not 1222.29 you total for 11 = 11176  that counts shipping and gives you 5 rasp pi's

my last s9 was 60 to ship so 1232 + 60 = 1292 x 6 = 7752

so s9 = 7752

avalon 7 = 11,176

if 1 s9 breaks that is  16.667% loss
if 0 A7 breaks  that is 0% loss

so  7752 x 1.16667 = 9044  act cost of the s9  not 7752

so compare 9044 to 11,176

next if the old s9 is really 83%  block luck

9044 x 1.16667 = 10551 is what 66th of old s9 costs you   vs 11,176

power you did at 10 cents do it at 5 cents

a7 = 4831  not 9661
s9 = 3124  not 6248

So this would be a lot closer to realty for people  that can do 66th of gear and purchased the old s9's

cost of the old s9's were a lot  higher then  the numbers used here. but some of the time blocks were 25 not 12.5



But that just numbers.

So if you want to prove a point at least  use the right prices for the avalon 7's

it still shows that s9's are  better not a lot  but still better

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 552


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 06:22:27 PM
 #22925

your price is  off on the a7  they are $888.00 before shipping not   1,222.29

I paid 2,032 for 2 with 1 controller  so if you use 1016  not 1222.29 you total for 11 = 11176  that counts shipping and gives you 5 rasp pi's
Quote
Edit 2: *based on retail price in yxt's singature

So, @ $1016, you only get to throw 4 unused S9s in the trash instead of 5  Tongue

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
tournamentdan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 06:23:37 PM
 #22926

... It's just there are bad business people not treating their equipment right that make it seem that there is a high failure rate.
AKA hobbyists  Wink

I tripped over the power cable to one of the PSUs running my S9 and it spiked the mains and now that hash board doesn't power up. PSU is still good so I suspect the regulator has died but it's too cold to take it apart because two S7s aren't enough to keep my flat warm.

Is that what you mean by hobbyist? Wink

Well I didn't quite mean it like that. I think the difference between the two is how much money you have to invest.  And with out a doubt there are stupid people with money to invest. And smart people with little money to invest.
This thread does have a lot of hobbyists. And I have learned a good bit off of them. For example. There were many people on this very thread that wrote "do not buy the first few batches of the s9. They will have problems just like the S5 and s3 did". And I did not buy until batch 5. Which must be the reason why I am not having any problems. So it sounds like other people did not use the same wisdom.
hhumaidan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 143
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 06:27:44 PM
 #22927

Hey,

Anyone noticed Avalon 741 or know what is the difference from 721?

https://github.com/Canaan-Creative/avalon7-docs/wiki/AvalonMiner-741-firmware-downloads
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 552


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 06:29:33 PM
 #22928

...There were many people on this very thread that wrote "do not buy the first few batches of the s9. They will have problems just like the S5 and s3 did". And I did not buy until batch 5. Which must be the reason why I am not having any problems. So it sounds like other people did not use the same wisdom.
Like I said, I'm not saying that they are without issues (I have some from batch 4 that run ~10 rather than ~13, but I'm "OK" with it because the ROI on downtime and shipping would take 27 months to equalize).

I'm simply saying that you have to be completely unconcerned with ROI, or just a complete fanboy, to say that the 2 rigs (S9 and A7) are even in the same market for comparison.

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 552


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 06:50:05 PM
 #22929

After edit:
...
OK, so using your revised set of numbers, for the same $ purchase, you get 8 S9's, 4 backup control boards, and 1 backup hashboard....
Which gives you 2 rigs on the shelf (to run when your imaginary "16.667% loss" takes place, twice...)...
So, with the S9 package, we have spare parts for all of the controllers (2 from the shelved rigs plus the 4 for equal cost), 7 spare hash boards (6 from the shelved rigs), greater power efficiency (enough to buy a 9th rig just from savings, by your own numbers), and someone's still a fanboy? Shocked

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
firetreeactual
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 05, 2017, 07:00:46 PM
 #22930

Well I didn't quite mean it like that. I think the difference between the two is how much money you have to invest.  And with out a doubt there are stupid people with money to invest. And smart people with little money to invest.
This thread does have a lot of hobbyists. And I have learned a good bit off of them. For example. There were many people on this very thread that wrote "do not buy the first few batches of the s9. They will have problems just like the S5 and s3 did". And I did not buy until batch 5. Which must be the reason why I am not having any problems. So it sounds like other people did not use the same wisdom.
I disagree. It's not how much you have to invest; it's what proportional importance mining has to your overall situation. A hobbyist does something because they enjoy it, and can afford to "lose" money on it...perhaps. I've been mining since the beginning, and I think that to assume because I run around 24TH at this point in time that I'm a hobbyist is...frankly...ridiculous. I'm partially disabled and live primarily on VA disability and SS. Mining provides a significant percentage of my net spendable (or invest-able, depending). OTOH, there was at time back in the day when I had a net worth of ~USD15M (1980 dollars). The crash in '07, plus nearly dying, drained every pence of my resources, and changed all that. So...I think those sorts of comparisons are not very helpful, because I'm not unique in that way.

My last point is that one should not have to think about waiting for the first few batches to show up the real bugs before buying...or that there should be a situation requiring...basically...running the mfr's burn-in beta tests at the expense of your customers' power and frustration. Now, THAT sucks.
 Kiss

To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
firetreeactual
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 05, 2017, 07:21:11 PM
 #22931

Hey,

Anyone noticed Avalon 741 or know what is the difference from 721?

https://github.com/Canaan-Creative/avalon7-docs/wiki/AvalonMiner-741-firmware-downloads
Well...from the look of it (haven't had time to read into it)...Canaan is working on the next iteration, which I would expect for them to be doing at this point. That's the great thing about open source. I should take a look at the code and see what I can see.  Grin

To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4060
Merit: 1622


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2017, 08:04:25 PM
 #22932

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that S9s aren't a steaming pile of bovine dung; I'm saying that, dung or not, they pay the bills better than the current alternatives.
Not if they're not finding blocks...

I am not sure how to interpret this from a practical point of view.
do other pools have the same phenomenon? What about slush's or other non-bitmain associated pools?
If they do-I will subscribe to this argument of "poison" S9 v1
If they don't-?


Are you saying the bad luck this pool is having is not really bad luck, just S9 not finding blocks on this pool?

Meanwhile the latest S9v1 statistics on the pool since the S9 existed:

They've found 82 Blocks, but expected to have found (BDR) 110.666 ...

Kano does a luck report regularly to find block withholders - they show up as making no blocks at all over an extended period when they should have made some (it's random so you can't detect it until they've been hashing many blocks' worth). He reports it here regularly though I'm not sure everyone understands the implications of the report. The S9 batch 1 across all miners as you see above by now should have found 110 blocks based on the total hashes they've submitted to this pool but have so far only found 82. This is by far worse than any other device that we can positively identify. We can only speculate why this is, but the batch 1 firmware also had some other stratum extension that was never working on any pools so it was removed in later firmware. It is possible there is some kind of bug in the original firmware.

This is why he was urging everyone with S9s that was still on v1 firmware to upgrade. I'm aware that you lose some kind of frequency control or fan control or something by upgrading but that's nowhere near as bad as (potentially) losing blocks.

As for whether other pools are affected, we can only report accurately what happens here, and only speculate what is happening on other pools based on people grumbling about bad luck on almost every other pool thread. It certainly looks like global luck has been down across all pools since the S9 came out, but I can't say anything for certain.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4074
Merit: 7590


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2017, 08:12:44 PM
 #22933

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that S9s aren't a steaming pile of bovine dung; I'm saying that, dung or not, they pay the bills better than the current alternatives.
Not if they're not finding blocks...

I am not sure how to interpret this from a practical point of view.
do other pools have the same phenomenon? What about slush's or other non-bitmain associated pools?
If they do-I will subscribe to this argument of "poison" S9 v1
If they don't-?


Are you saying the bad luck this pool is having is not really bad luck, just S9 not finding blocks on this pool?

Meanwhile the latest S9v1 statistics on the pool since the S9 existed:

They've found 82 Blocks, but expected to have found (BDR) 110.666 ...

Kano does a luck report regularly to find block withholders - they show up as making no blocks at all over an extended period when they should have made some (it's random so you can't detect it until they've been hashing many blocks' worth). He reports it here regularly though I'm not sure everyone understands the implications of the report. The S9 batch 1 across all miners as you see above by now should have found 110 blocks based on the total hashes they've submitted to this pool but have so far only found 82. This is by far worse than any other device that we can positively identify. We can only speculate why this is, but the batch 1 firmware also had some other stratum extension that was never working on any pools so it was removed in later firmware. It is possible there is some kind of bug in the original firmware.

This is why he was urging everyone with S9s that was still on v1 firmware to upgrade. I'm aware that you lose some kind of frequency control or fan control or something by upgrading but that's nowhere near as bad as (potentially) losing blocks.

As for whether other pools are affected, we can only report accurately what happens here, and only speculate what is happening on other pools based on people grumbling about bad luck on almost every other pool thread. It certainly looks like global luck has been down across all pools since the S9 came out, but I can't say anything for certain.

If you absolutely can not  upgrade to the new autotune firmware (my case until April)  You can pull from this pool and point to Antpool or f2pool

Just point auto tune s9's here  or in my case avalon 7's.  At the moment I have all my avalon 7's here and all my s9 old firmware at f2pool.

I am hoping to get some  bitfury and point here.


The goal is to get all old firmware s9's off this pool

or updated to auto firmware if you can.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 552


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 08:28:56 PM
 #22934

...The S9 batch 1 across all miners as you see above by now should have found 110 blocks based on the total hashes they've submitted to this pool but have so far only found 82. This is by far worse than any other device that we can positively identify....

Yeah, no. As I posted before......
...
Code:
Name         CDF[Erl]
S9v1         0.994766  103.6 BDR   79 Blocks
...
A7v1         0.772224    6.5 BDR    5 Blocks
...
...
When extrapolated, 6.5:5 is virtually* the same as 103.6:79!

If you absolutely can not  upgrade to the new autotune firmware (my case until April)  You can pull from this pool and point to Antpool or f2pool

Just point auto tune s9's here  or in my case avalon 7's.  At the moment I have all my avalon 7's here and all my s9 old firmware at f2pool.

I am hoping to get some  bitfury and point here.


The goal is to get all old firmware s9's off this pool

or updated to auto firmware if you can.

See above and see why you should be making the exact same appeal to A7 owners!


*< 1 block difference in 103 total blocks

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 3797



View Profile
January 05, 2017, 08:32:19 PM
 #22935


Kano does a luck report regularly to find block withholders - they show up as making no blocks at all over an extended period when they should have made some (it's random so you can't detect it until they've been hashing many blocks' worth). He reports it here regularly though I'm not sure everyone understands the implications of the report. The S9 batch 1 across all miners as you see above by now should have found 110 blocks based on the total hashes they've submitted to this pool but have so far only found 82. This is by far worse than any other device that we can positively identify. We can only speculate why this is, but the batch 1 firmware also had some other stratum extension that was never working on any pools so it was removed in later firmware. It is possible there is some kind of bug in the original firmware.

This is why he was urging everyone with S9s that was still on v1 firmware to upgrade. I'm aware that you lose some kind of frequency control or fan control or something by upgrading but that's nowhere near as bad as (potentially) losing blocks.

As for whether other pools are affected, we can only report accurately what happens here, and only speculate what is happening on other pools based on people grumbling about bad luck on almost every other pool thread. It certainly looks like global luck has been down across all pools since the S9 came out, but I can't say anything for certain.

it is not that simple (re upgrade). New firmware does not work quite well on old (non-autotuned) miners, at least for me. I tried and miners overheated.
realistic choice is to point S9 v1 miners to other pools and that's what people probably did and Phil mentioned this.
Personally, i think that pushing this proposition might result in a loss of much hashing power of your pool, but it is your playground, you make the rules.
re statistics, wasn't that 68-70 vs 100 expected before? If so, then more recent blocks are 12 vs 10 expected.
I would like some specialist analyze all of it. Can organofcorti take a look at all of this? Many people would be interested.
In clinical trials data based on a subset that was not initially established usually turns out to be a false signal, but who really knows here.
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4060
Merit: 1622


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2017, 08:35:44 PM
 #22936

...The S9 batch 1 across all miners as you see above by now should have found 110 blocks based on the total hashes they've submitted to this pool but have so far only found 82. This is by far worse than any other device that we can positively identify....

Yeah, no. As I posted before......
...
Code:
Name         CDF[Erl]
S9v1         0.994766  103.6 BDR   79 Blocks
...
A7v1         0.772224    6.5 BDR    5 Blocks
...
...
When extrapolated, 6.5:5 is virtually* the same as 103.6:79!

If you absolutely can not  upgrade to the new autotune firmware (my case until April)  You can pull from this pool and point to Antpool or f2pool

Just point auto tune s9's here  or in my case avalon 7's.  At the moment I have all my avalon 7's here and all my s9 old firmware at f2pool.

I am hoping to get some  bitfury and point here.


The goal is to get all old firmware s9's off this pool

or updated to auto firmware if you can.

See above and see why you should be making the exact same appeal to A7 owners!


*< 1 block difference in 103 total blocks
No. Sample size is too small to draw the same conclusion with only 6.5 total BDR. Plus we're not saying CONCLUSIVELY that it is a problem, but upgrading firmware, where you can, is desirable since it MAY be a problem.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8906


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2017, 08:48:10 PM
 #22937

So, @ $1016, you only get to throw 4 unused S9s in the trash instead of 5  Tongue

Can you even buy a new S9? Every time I look it's out of stock.

The only real advantage of the S9 is its resale value, which for some inexplicable reason is still very high. Although if you consider BTC exchange rate those ~4 BTC early batches don't sound so good.

Other than that both the S9 and the A7 sound like shitty investments considering recent diff jumps and Bitmain firing up its Hashnest and whatnot.
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 552


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 08:52:41 PM
 #22938

...The only real advantage of the S9 is its resale value, which for some inexplicable reason is still very high...
Unless you're dying and need quick liquidation or a more efficient model comes out, who cares about resale value?  Huh

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4060
Merit: 1622


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2017, 08:54:14 PM
 #22939

While you and Kano might not be, in order to apply that statement broadly, it seems you've only been skimming every 3rd post or so.  Tongue
Me? I hate how much time I spend on this forum:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=19971;sa=statPanel

I'd love to avoid coming here as much as I do since I have a sense of obligation now that I am a moderator, but all the other moderators have gone idle Undecided

I do read far too many threads so don't assume I've been skimming (it's not exactly all enjoyable reading, nor the friendliest forum on earth.) Giving the recommendation I did did not come lightly. Even kano has avoided explicitly spelling it out the way I did and he's very conscious of the potential loss of significant hashrate if people just point their hashes elsewhere. I did not tell people to point their hashes elsewhere, but I'm recommending people upgrade IF they can AND it suits. You're right that I did not explicitly say so in the earlier post though.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8906


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2017, 09:05:10 PM
 #22940

...The only real advantage of the S9 is its resale value, which for some inexplicable reason is still very high...
Unless you're dying and need quick liquidation or a more efficient model comes out, who cares about resale value?  Huh

I'm pretty sure there are more than just those two reasons for reselling miners Smiley

When the resale value exceeds the reasonable expectation of what you can possibly mine with the device - you should get rid of it (or not buy it to begin with) - wouldn't you agree? Unless it's a hobby. In which case none of the ROI talk matters anyway.
Pages: « 1 ... 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 [1147] 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 ... 2248 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!