|
wmabern
|
 |
March 10, 2017, 10:48:29 PM |
|
COME ON guys and gals... Let's CRACK this SOB!!
Then on to some GREEN BLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Enough is enough!!!!!
what the ****? where are the blocks? This is getting ridiculous!!! The usual suspects are grabbing all the blocks according to BlockTrail. I have three and 2/3rd's S9's on the pool - one board has been sent off for repair - and my older three S7's also. About 60TH's is all I can muster. Let's knock this MF'er out!!!!! Then three or four quick blocks afterwards!  |
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-)
Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
March 10, 2017, 10:54:42 PM |
|
Bloodbath... COIN ETF got denied by SEC.
What's an ETF? an altcoin? |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
IntroVert
|
|
March 10, 2017, 11:02:44 PM |
|
Bloodbath... COIN ETF got denied by SEC.
What's an ETF? an altcoin? Exchange traded fund. Got denied because SEC concluded it cannot exercise oversight on the major bitcoin exchanges. |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7764
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
March 10, 2017, 11:05:58 PM |
|
Bloodbath... COIN ETF got denied by SEC.
What's an ETF? an altcoin? Exchange traded fund. Got denied because SEC concluded it cannot exercise oversight on the major bitcoin exchanges. Might be better that this happened. I will buy .5 btc today |
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
March 10, 2017, 11:25:06 PM |
|
Sorry for OT,
But Slush hasn't had a block in over 7 hours, and that's with over 209 PH.
It's time for the blocks to fall!!!!
|
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-)
Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506
Evil beware: We have waffles!
|
|
March 10, 2017, 11:25:18 PM |
|
Bloodbath... COIN ETF got denied by SEC.
What's an ETF? an altcoin? Supposed to be a day-traders heaven. Share were to be bought/sold same as any other security. Ergo the need for SEC approval. |
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
March 10, 2017, 11:27:39 PM |
|
Bloodbath... COIN ETF got denied by SEC.
What's an ETF? an altcoin? Supposed to be a day-traders heaven. Share were to be bought/sold same as any other security. Ergo the need for SEC approval. Makes sense. Thanks for the info. I have heard about the ETF, but didn't really understand what it was. |
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-)
Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506
Evil beware: We have waffles!
|
|
March 10, 2017, 11:35:40 PM
Last edit: March 11, 2017, 01:00:25 AM by NotFuzzyWarm |
|
Now for something that is on topic. Looking at shares performance - specifically my Avalons vs Ants and I see that the Avalons have a MUCH higher percentage of Invalids than the Ants do. Condensed sorted by Invalids  Details as to what the Invalid share are  As one can see most of the Avalon Invalids are either Dupes or Stale shares. Avalon workers used: Avalon721_1 is 1 controller, 3x 721's in one chain, 1x 741 on its own port. Avalon741_CM is one controller and 1x 741 miner. Should these Invalids be of concern? Why are the Avalons throwing so many? As in over 10x and more. The s7 and s9's have far far less stales/dupes per-THs. |
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
March 11, 2017, 12:54:27 AM |
|
Good Lord! Going on 72 hours - 3 days - without a block! I'm damned inpatient! Something's got to give soon!!! Rant over/  |
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-)
Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
Gren
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2017, 02:10:26 AM |
|
blocks plz * Gren sacrifices some chikens  |
|
|
|
|
|
Sr.Urbanist
|
|
March 11, 2017, 03:42:12 AM |
|
blocks plz * Gren sacrifices some chikens Jaja. I've put an old metal trunk near the outflow and some rocks I found in Guatemala near the exhausts of the S9s to help radiate the heat. It's nice ... reminds me of my heating in Maastricht, NL, during study abroad. I have not had to use my 1500W heater at all. It's great :fire: |
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 11, 2017, 04:30:34 AM |
|
Now for something that is on topic. Looking at shares performance - specifically my Avalons vs Ants and I see that the Avalons have a MUCH higher percentage of Invalids than the Ants do. Condensed sorted by Invalids https://i.imgur.com/0mS8CG1l.pngDetails as to what the Invalid share are https://i.imgur.com/AaPRuarl.pngAs one can see most of the Avalon Invalids are either Dupes or Stale shares. Avalon workers used: Avalon721_1 is 1 controller, 3x 721's in one chain, 1x 741 on its own port. Avalon741_CM is one controller and 1x 741 miner. Should these Invalids be of concern? Why are the Avalons throwing so many? As in over 10x and more. The s7 and s9's have far far less stales/dupes per-THs. Well I did reply to this same question when huynhdat1989 asked ... However, a list of info: Hash rate shown doesn't include invalids, thus reducing invalids will increase your hash rate by the % you reduce it. Bitmain miners hide stale shares, though in your pics the bitmain range itself is 3.28 times from lowest to highest. I mine from the other side of the planet and get the same sort of numbers, only a little higher. (as you can see under Workers->K.Workers on the web site) I guess that '~0.75%' stales may be standard with them since I've checked some large 'farms' of them and they are around that figure also. |
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
March 11, 2017, 05:34:51 AM |
|
Now for something that is on topic. Looking at shares performance - specifically my Avalons vs Ants and I see that the Avalons have a MUCH higher percentage of Invalids than the Ants do. Condensed sorted by Invalids https://i.imgur.com/0mS8CG1l.pngDetails as to what the Invalid share are https://i.imgur.com/AaPRuarl.pngAs one can see most of the Avalon Invalids are either Dupes or Stale shares. Avalon workers used: Avalon721_1 is 1 controller, 3x 721's in one chain, 1x 741 on its own port. Avalon741_CM is one controller and 1x 741 miner. Should these Invalids be of concern? Why are the Avalons throwing so many? As in over 10x and more. The s7 and s9's have far far less stales/dupes per-THs. Well I did reply to this same question when huynhdat1989 asked ... However, a list of info: Hash rate shown doesn't include invalids, thus reducing invalids will increase your hash rate by the % you reduce it. Bitmain miners hide stale shares, though in your pics the bitmain range itself is 3.28 times from lowest to highest. I mine from the other side of the planet and get the same sort of numbers, only a little higher. (as you can see under Workers->K.Workers on the web site) I guess that '~0.75%' stales may be standard with them since I've checked some large 'farms' of them and they are around that figure also. My 120 x A721s hosted in Canada, averages about 0.5 to 0.7% invalid shares. Anything more than 1% probably will be a concern. Other than that, I would not worry too much about this factor because there are hardly any serious downtimes with Avalons. Its the S9s that are giving me the white hairs. |
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
bitsink
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2017, 06:01:00 AM |
|
Are there any stats of what was the longest time in between blocks? I know statistics and all, but this really seems kind of long... Maybe solo mining is not such a good idea after all  |
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 11, 2017, 06:33:41 AM |
|
Are there any stats of what was the longest time in between blocks? I know statistics and all, but this really seems kind of long... Maybe solo mining is not such a good idea after all Time is not relevant, % is what decides. If a pool is half the size, then the blocks will always take twice as long. If a pool is twice the size, then the blocks will always take half as long. In all (3) cases if the pool is paying the same level of reward, you expect the same reward. The longest block was the 1st pool block. 25.5 days - Diff was 55.77% The largest % block so far is ... 745% Though I've no idea what solo mining has to do with it  |
|
|
|
|
smutboy420
|
|
March 11, 2017, 08:16:51 AM |
|
Sorry for OT,
But Slush hasn't had a block in over 7 hours, and that's with over 209 PH.
It's time for the blocks to fall!!!!
Slushypoop has had a bit of extra long blocks in the last few days. and Thats with a lot of added hash power they have picked up over there so a 100% luck block should be about a bit under 3 hrs on slush with the hr they have. and I seen a few blocks that were like 12 and 13 hours apart there. which is the same as a block taking us about 4 days to crack. and antpoo right now looks as if they have had so many extra long blocks there over all pool luck % is down to 50% and on there graph its the lowest dip in the line right now for how far back there histoy graph goes back. I've been watching them both for a few days and its making it seem as if the luck isnt just us getting these long to crack blocks. |
|
|
|
bitsink
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2017, 11:30:24 AM |
|
Are there any stats of what was the longest time in between blocks? I know statistics and all, but this really seems kind of long... Maybe solo mining is not such a good idea after all Time is not relevant, % is what decides. If a pool is half the size, then the blocks will always take twice as long. If a pool is twice the size, then the blocks will always take half as long. In all (3) cases if the pool is paying the same level of reward, you expect the same reward. The longest block was the 1st pool block. 25.5 days - Diff was 55.77% The largest % block so far is ... 745% Though I've no idea what solo mining has to do with it Yes, right. The %age is what is comparable. 745% wow, that is quite a statistic anonomaly. Solo mining? Because I am thinking of trying my luck on that with a handful of TH/s... |
|
|
|
|
VanAllen
Member
Offline
Activity: 240
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2017, 02:23:56 PM |
|
1748 456756 14.33670386 2017‑03‑11 14:05:40 +4 Confirms 1,915,268,788,041 415.668% 0.984 96.52% FINALLY!!  |
|
|
|
|
cybermods
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
Jack of all trades, master of none.
|
|
March 11, 2017, 02:25:26 PM |
|
BLOCK By Vasilisa916 With around 104TH Congrats 
|
Keep calm and carry on mining.
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
March 11, 2017, 03:05:31 PM |
|
Bloodbath... COIN ETF got denied by SEC.
What's an ETF? an altcoin? Exchange traded fund. Got denied because SEC concluded it cannot exercise oversight on the major bitcoin exchanges. Ah, thanks. Do we want the SEC trying to exercise oversight? Probably not. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
