Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 10:11:49 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 ... 139 »
  Print  
Author Topic: delete  (Read 165490 times)
argentinx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 07:44:39 PM
 #1141

are not English
I'm using google translator
easier the translation
if I divide
phrases
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713564709
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713564709

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713564709
Reply with quote  #2

1713564709
Report to moderator
gwada971
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:09:57 PM
 #1142

Wish that's all of these will be behind soon, and monero dev could work on the final GUI and the DB !! (eat my RAM Wink
PestoQuinty
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:10:27 PM
 #1143

Wish that's all of these will be behind soon, and monero dev could work on the final GUI and the DB !! (eat my RAM Wink

Yes, please!
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:30:54 PM
 #1144

http://bullbearanalytics.com/2014/09/23/whats-going-monero/

The above web page has an error in their summary of events: the (not yet verified by simulation) attack I proposed for unmasking the anonymity of some (not all) of the rings would not require the attacker to own any of the inputs to the rings.

It is not yet known how effective my algorithm is, i.e. what % of the rings would be unmasked and whether the computation would even be feasible on known levels of computing power. If the attacker Sybil attacks the inputs, then the effectiveness probably increases and the potential mitigation probably weakens. But we don't know any thing for sure and we haven't quantified it. All we have now is I showed some pseudocode for how it might be possible and it is impossible from looking at the algorithm to determine if it will be very effective or not. We can hope once we have a simulation it will provide some insight into the quantification of the effectiveness of a Sybil attack on the anonymity.
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 08:48:52 PM
 #1145

Wish that's all of these will be behind soon, and monero dev could work on the final GUI and the DB !! (eat my RAM Wink

Yes, please!

I have windows 8, pentium chip, 4GB RAM.  I am currently running a full node, mining, (not with wallet), with both threads = 100% cpu, on bct forum on chrome, watching video on IE, while playing poker on the intertubes.

Yes the DB will be finished soon®

If you would like to donate to the dev fund any amount would be appreciated.
5w00p
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 24, 2014, 09:44:32 PM
 #1146

TheFascistMind is a good idea
but the remerge
<snip>


Just One Question: Why the hell are you typing like that?  Cheesy Shocked Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh

This, it's fucking impossible to read.  Wink

x, why don't you stop being a solipsistic english-speaking prick and get over it?

argentinx told you why he does it and he is trying to contribute. What are you contributing, besides your crybaby tears?
DCRnerd
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 09:57:10 PM
 #1147

http://bullbearanalytics.com/2014/09/23/whats-going-monero/

The above web page has an error in their summary of events: the (not yet verified by simulation) attack I proposed for unmasking the anonymity of some (not all) of the rings would not require the attacker to own any of the inputs to the rings.

It is not yet known how effective my algorithm is, i.e. what % of the rings would be unmasked and whether the computation would even be feasible on known levels of computing power. If the attacker Sybil attacks the inputs, then the effectiveness probably increases and the potential mitigation probably weakens. But we don't know any thing for sure and we haven't quantified it. All we have now is I showed some pseudocode for how it might be possible and it is impossible from looking at the algorithm to determine if it will be very effective or not. We can hope once we have a simulation it will provide some insight into the quantification of the effectiveness of a Sybil attack on the anonymity.

Co-author of the linked post here. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll make an edit to reflect the info you provided here.
NewLiberty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002


Gresham's Lawyer


View Profile WWW
September 24, 2014, 09:58:27 PM
 #1148

are not English
I'm using google translator
easier the translation
if I divide
phrases
Potete tradurre le frasi avanti e indietro con google un paio di volte fino a che non viene fuori proprio nella traduzione per la lingua?

FREE MONEY1 Bitcoin for Silver and Gold NewLibertyDollar.com and now BITCOIN SPECIE (silver 1 ozt) shows value by QR
Bulk premiums as low as .0012 BTC "BETTER, MORE COLLECTIBLE, AND CHEAPER THAN SILVER EAGLES" 1Free of Government
NewLiberty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002


Gresham's Lawyer


View Profile WWW
September 24, 2014, 10:09:54 PM
 #1149

http://bullbearanalytics.com/2014/09/23/whats-going-monero/

The above web page has an error in their summary of events: the (not yet verified by simulation) attack I proposed for unmasking the anonymity of some (not all) of the rings would not require the attacker to own any of the inputs to the rings.

It is not yet known how effective my algorithm is, i.e. what % of the rings would be unmasked and whether the computation would even be feasible on known levels of computing power. If the attacker Sybil attacks the inputs, then the effectiveness probably increases and the potential mitigation probably weakens. But we don't know any thing for sure and we haven't quantified it. All we have now is I showed some pseudocode for how it might be possible and it is impossible from looking at the algorithm to determine if it will be very effective or not. We can hope once we have a simulation it will provide some insight into the quantification of the effectiveness of a Sybil attack on the anonymity.

Co-author of the linked post here. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll make an edit to reflect the info you provided here.

If you are editing, you might consider replacing 'levity' with 'gravity' in your "THE THREAT" section?  I think it may have been what you meant.

FREE MONEY1 Bitcoin for Silver and Gold NewLibertyDollar.com and now BITCOIN SPECIE (silver 1 ozt) shows value by QR
Bulk premiums as low as .0012 BTC "BETTER, MORE COLLECTIBLE, AND CHEAPER THAN SILVER EAGLES" 1Free of Government
DCRnerd
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 10:31:03 PM
 #1150

http://bullbearanalytics.com/2014/09/23/whats-going-monero/

The above web page has an error in their summary of events: the (not yet verified by simulation) attack I proposed for unmasking the anonymity of some (not all) of the rings would not require the attacker to own any of the inputs to the rings.

It is not yet known how effective my algorithm is, i.e. what % of the rings would be unmasked and whether the computation would even be feasible on known levels of computing power. If the attacker Sybil attacks the inputs, then the effectiveness probably increases and the potential mitigation probably weakens. But we don't know any thing for sure and we haven't quantified it. All we have now is I showed some pseudocode for how it might be possible and it is impossible from looking at the algorithm to determine if it will be very effective or not. We can hope once we have a simulation it will provide some insight into the quantification of the effectiveness of a Sybil attack on the anonymity.

Co-author of the linked post here. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll make an edit to reflect the info you provided here.

If you are editing, you might consider replacing 'levity' with 'gravity' in your "THE THREAT" section?  I think it may have been what you meant.

I certainly did sir. Post updated. Much appreciated.
dNote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
September 24, 2014, 11:03:08 PM
 #1151

idiotism

DigitalNote XDN website http://digitalnote.org
XDN 1st blockchain deposits with interest & instant untraceable crypto messages GUI https://github.com/xdn-project/digitalnotewallet/releases
Bitcointalk topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082745.new#new
RedZeppelin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 11:24:48 PM
 #1152

We need a BitcoinEXpressCoin like a Curecoin panel where we can lend our hashrates to his experiments.
A couple of 1000 users and all shitcoins would be dead Grin



Kahir - Scamming dev of Rebirthcoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=798159.msg8977686#msg8977686 gets a free happy meal!!
manselr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1004


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 11:32:08 PM
 #1153

Can a non biased used drop some cliffs for me? Should I sell? Im just a peasant with 30 XMR. I think this coin is LEGIT, had a partnership with i2p, it was great.. but this BCX attack thing is getting on my mother fucking nerves now.
matrix961
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 24, 2014, 11:44:05 PM
 #1154

Can a non biased used drop some cliffs for me? Should I sell? Im just a peasant with 30 XMR. I think this coin is LEGIT, had a partnership with i2p, it was great.. but this BCX attack thing is getting on my mother fucking nerves now.

I'm holding my stash based on the following.

- devs quick to react and investigate issue instead of just ignoring it.
- other resources pulled together to help (cz, anonymint, jl777).
- communicated to exchanges as a precautionary measure.
- community coming together to show support.

Even if bcx is just talking its important to have devs that are willing to at least take a look and that's what they have been doing a great job of.
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
September 25, 2014, 12:28:39 AM
 #1155

are not English
I'm using google translator
easier the translation
if I divide
phrases
Potete tradurre le frasi avanti e indietro con google un paio di volte fino a che non viene fuori proprio nella traduzione per la lingua?

Once I tried using that method to post a question in Chinese on the Chinese language sub-forum.  I don't know what came out, but judging from the replies it must have been something quite funny.

Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.
vuduchyld
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 25, 2014, 12:30:55 AM
 #1156

Can a non biased used drop some cliffs for me? Should I sell? Im just a peasant with 30 XMR. I think this coin is LEGIT, had a partnership with i2p, it was great.. but this BCX attack thing is getting on my mother fucking nerves now.

I'm holding my stash based on the following.

- devs quick to react and investigate issue instead of just ignoring it.
- other resources pulled together to help (cz, anonymint, jl777).
- communicated to exchanges as a precautionary measure.
- community coming together to show support.

Even if bcx is just talking its important to have devs that are willing to at least take a look and that's what they have been doing a great job of.

+ eleventy bazillion
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
September 25, 2014, 01:14:52 AM
 #1157

Can a non biased used drop some cliffs for me? Should I sell? Im just a peasant with 30 XMR. I think this coin is LEGIT, had a partnership with i2p, it was great.. but this BCX attack thing is getting on my mother fucking nerves now.

http://bullbearanalytics.com/2014/09/23/whats-going-monero/
zerocashdev
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 25, 2014, 02:28:54 AM
 #1158

Can a non biased used drop some cliffs for me? Should I sell? Im just a peasant with 30 XMR. I think this coin is LEGIT, had a partnership with i2p, it was great.. but this BCX attack thing is getting on my mother fucking nerves now.

http://bullbearanalytics.com/2014/09/23/whats-going-monero/

Thanks for sharing. It was a good read and seems pretty unbiased. Smiley
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
September 25, 2014, 02:51:48 AM
 #1159

Can a non biased used drop some cliffs for me? Should I sell? Im just a peasant with 30 XMR. I think this coin is LEGIT, had a partnership with i2p, it was great.. but this BCX attack thing is getting on my mother fucking nerves now.

Get used to it.  All crypto will always be under threat.  You can enjoy the comfort of knowing that the team managing the process has some quite respectable skill at doing so, thus differentiating it from the various one-man shows.  XMR is way ahead of where bitcoin was at this age, in every reasonable metric of merit that I have considered - and I have considered many.

Selling would be foolish in my opinion.

I could do without anonymint's "if P=NP then there are many vulnerabilities" posts.  He's pretty accurate and insightful, but he completely misleads most readers, and quite recklessly.  Arguing math in a troll thread is asinine.  I doubt that he's done more good than harm at this point.

All the posturing and threats and chest thumping are just pathetic.  I have been there and done that, and I hope I've grown past it.  Not much I can do to wean these wet-nappied wailers, though.  Pearls would just be trodden anyhow.



Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
Viper1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 320


View Profile
September 25, 2014, 02:53:44 AM
 #1160

Does any one know how long it would take for a TW attack to start to manifest itself?

BTC: 1F8yJqgjeFyX1SX6KJmqYtHiHXJA89ENNT
LTC: LYAEPQeDDM7Y4jbUH2AwhBmkzThAGecNBV
DOGE: DSUsCCdt98PcNgUkFHLDFdQXmPrQBEqXu9
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 ... 139 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!