Bitcoin Forum
July 17, 2018, 03:10:00 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: CKPOOL - Open source pool/proxy/passthrough/redirector/library in c for Linux  (Read 102872 times)
fudnet
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 13, 2017, 04:58:35 AM
 #321

Does ckpool work as a generic stratum proxy when run in proxy mode (-p) or is this Bitcoin specific? Wondering as I have use to aggregate multiple Scrypt miners, want to use ckpool in proxy mode to override stratum URL as well as auth credentials enmasse for multiple miners. Have compiled and configured as follows:

Run as: ckpool -p -c ckproxy.conf -k

ckproxy.conf:
Code:
{
"proxy" :  [
        {
                "url" : "scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub",
                "auth" : "some_btc_address",
                "pass" : "x"
        },
        {
                "url" : "scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub",
                "auth" : "some_btc_address",
                "pass" : "x"
        }
],
"update_interval" : 30,
"serverurl" : [
        "192.168.2.77:3334",
        "127.0.0.1:3334"
        ],
"mindiff" : 1,
"startdiff" : 1,
"maxdiff" : 0,
"logdir" : "logs",
"loglevel" : "7"
}

Onscreen results are:
Code:
[2017-10-12 23:05:48.118] ckproxy generator starting
[2017-10-12 23:05:48.119] ckproxy connector starting
[2017-10-12 23:05:48.119] ckproxy connector ready
[2017-10-12 23:05:48.119] ckproxy stratifier starting
[2017-10-12 23:05:48.120] ckproxy stratifier ready
[2017-10-12 23:05:48.417] Proxy 0:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub connection established
[2017-10-12 23:05:49.130] Successfully connected to pool 0 scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub as proxy
[2017-10-12 23:05:49.130] ckproxy generator ready
[2017-10-12 23:05:53.367] Proxy 1:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub connection established
[2017-10-12 23:11:45.366] Proxy 0:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub reconnect issue to scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub, dropping existing connection
[2017-10-12 23:11:45.367] Successfully connected to pool 1 scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub as proxy
[2017-10-12 23:11:45.373] Proxy 1:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub reconnect issue to scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub, dropping existing connection
[2017-10-12 23:11:46.374] Successfully connected to pool 0 scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub as proxy
[2017-10-12 23:11:50.367] Proxy 0:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub completed issued reconnection
[2017-10-12 23:11:50.374] Proxy 1:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub completed issued reconnection
[2017-10-12 23:14:01.141] Proxy 1:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub failed, attempting reconnect
[2017-10-12 23:14:01.150] Proxy 0:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub reconnect issue to scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub, dropping existing connection
[2017-10-12 23:14:01.202] Proxy 0 reached max clients 1
[2017-10-12 23:14:01.251] Temporarily insufficient proxies to accept more clients
[2017-10-12 23:14:01.251] Failed to provide subscription due to no sdata
[2017-10-12 23:14:06.142] Proxy 1:scrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3333/#xnsub recovered
[2017-10-12 23:15:32.115] - 0.00H/s  0.0 SPS  1 users  1 workers

The hashrate stays at 0H/s, and I see worker connection on pool, but miner shows all rejections/discards, and toggles between alive/dead status.

Thoughts?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1531797000
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531797000

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531797000
Reply with quote  #2

1531797000
Report to moderator
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1110


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2017, 05:04:52 AM
 #322

Does ckpool work as a generic stratum proxy when run in proxy mode (-p) or is this Bitcoin specific?
Documentation goes to great pains to say it's bitcoin only.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
fudnet
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 13, 2017, 05:07:27 AM
 #323

Well then, that explains it. I guess I assumed Bitcoin mention as generic crypto.  Huh

Any other software you're aware of that does what ckpool does, but for Scrypt or other algorithms?
wavelengthsf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 110


View Profile
October 16, 2017, 05:36:43 PM
 #324

The documentation for the proxy says:

Quote
Note that the upstream pool needs to be a ckpool for it to scale to large hashrates

Is there any guidance for what is "large" in the hashrate? Would 50 TH/s, for example, be large?

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1110


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2017, 08:34:56 PM
 #325

The documentation for the proxy says:

Quote
Note that the upstream pool needs to be a ckpool for it to scale to large hashrates

Is there any guidance for what is "large" in the hashrate? Would 50 TH/s, for example, be large?


This is no longer the case. Any pool can be used upstream.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
powrslave
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2017, 12:45:03 AM
 #326

can I mine with nicehash on here?
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1110


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2017, 12:46:12 AM
 #327

can I mine with nicehash on here?
This is the ckpool SOFTWARE thread. You want the ckpool.org or solo.ckpool.org mining pool thread and the answer is yes.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Mamasita22
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 101


ENTRY cryptocurrency


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 08:24:22 AM
 #328

Interestingly, it may actually have been working fine. I got similar errors on 64-bit as well. Issue seemed to be hangups with bitcoind. Adding more RAM and setting bitcoind to properly use the notifier seems to made it all work a lot smoother. Still running it on 64-bit.

BenHacked
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 08, 2017, 07:04:21 PM
 #329

I'm hoping someone has already encountered this and has a quick answer.  Otherwise I'll do some digging this weekend.  I have set up the ckpool on just a clean local server.  If I'm reading the error correctly, it's the URL in the ckpool.conf file that's throwing the error when trying to bind to stratum port.  I also haven't seen any info on increasing the rcvbufsiz.  TIA.




[2017-12-08 12:52:01.802] ckpool generator starting
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.802] ckpool stratifier starting
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.802] ckpool connector starting
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.803] Failed to bind socket for 192.168.1.46:3333
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.803] Connector failed to bind to socket, retrying in 5s
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.962] Failed to increase rcvbufsiz to 532480, increase rmem_max or start ckpool privileged
[2017-12-08 12:52:02.215] ckpool generator ready
[2017-12-08 12:52:02.215] Connected to bitcoind: localhost:8332
[2017-12-08 12:52:02.287] ckpool stratifier ready[2017-12-08 12:52:06.803] Failed to bind socket for 192.168.1.46:3333
[2017-12-08 12:52:06.803] Connector failed to bind to socket, retrying in 5s
[2017-12-08 12:52:11.803] Failed to bind socket for 192.168.1.46:3333
[2017-12-08 12:52:11.803] Connector failed to bind to socket, retrying in 5s
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1110


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2017, 07:53:16 PM
 #330

I'm hoping someone has already encountered this and has a quick answer.  Otherwise I'll do some digging this weekend.  I have set up the ckpool on just a clean local server.  If I'm reading the error correctly, it's the URL in the ckpool.conf file that's throwing the error when trying to bind to stratum port.  I also haven't seen any info on increasing the rcvbufsiz.  TIA.




Code:
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.802] ckpool generator starting
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.802] ckpool stratifier starting
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.802] ckpool connector starting
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.803] Failed to bind socket for 192.168.1.46:3333
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.803] Connector failed to bind to socket, retrying in 5s
[2017-12-08 12:52:01.962] Failed to increase rcvbufsiz to 532480, increase rmem_max or start ckpool privileged
[2017-12-08 12:52:02.215] ckpool generator ready
[2017-12-08 12:52:02.215] Connected to bitcoind: localhost:8332
[2017-12-08 12:52:02.287] ckpool stratifier ready[2017-12-08 12:52:06.803] Failed to bind socket for 192.168.1.46:3333
[2017-12-08 12:52:06.803] Connector failed to bind to socket, retrying in 5s
[2017-12-08 12:52:11.803] Failed to bind socket for 192.168.1.46:3333
[2017-12-08 12:52:11.803] Connector failed to bind to socket, retrying in 5s
Assuming you have the correct IP address and you're not trying to bind to a privileged port, usually that means something else is bound to the port already. The rcvbufsiz message tells you what you need to change in your linux config (sysctl.conf). If you're only going to be using ckpool locally it is not needed.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
WBF1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 418
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 03:55:53 AM
 #331

hi ck and kano

sorry to hear about the falling out.

without ckdb, there's no "easy way" to have ckpool set the generation address to the address of the user who finds it, right? And ckdb is still "as-is" in this repo?

Anonymous, no-registration, no-frills BCH Mining - http://luckypool.co - Get Lucky Today!
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1110


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 20, 2017, 03:57:43 AM
 #332

hi ck and kano

sorry to hear about the falling out.

without ckdb, there's no "easy way" to have ckpool set the generation address to the address of the user who finds it, right? And ckdb is still "as-is" in this repo?
That's correct, though there is the ckpool-splns fork which does all the apportioning of reward via coinbase generation without a database, as used on ckpool.org

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
WBF1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 418
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 04:03:24 AM
 #333

hi ck and kano

sorry to hear about the falling out.

without ckdb, there's no "easy way" to have ckpool set the generation address to the address of the user who finds it, right? And ckdb is still "as-is" in this repo?
That's correct, though there is the ckpool-splns fork which does all the apportioning of reward via coinbase generation without a database, as used on ckpool.org

is that fork public?

edit: nevermind i found it

Anonymous, no-registration, no-frills BCH Mining - http://luckypool.co - Get Lucky Today!
WBF1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 418
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 04:53:53 AM
 #334

hi ck and kano

sorry to hear about the falling out.

without ckdb, there's no "easy way" to have ckpool set the generation address to the address of the user who finds it, right? And ckdb is still "as-is" in this repo?
That's correct, though there is the ckpool-splns fork which does all the apportioning of reward via coinbase generation without a database, as used on ckpool.org

is that fork public?

edit: nevermind i found it

so, ckpool-splns changes that control the coinbase generation are in stratifier? Is it all documented only in code? or also in a readme somewhere?

Anonymous, no-registration, no-frills BCH Mining - http://luckypool.co - Get Lucky Today!
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1110


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 20, 2017, 04:55:14 AM
 #335

hi ck and kano

sorry to hear about the falling out.

without ckdb, there's no "easy way" to have ckpool set the generation address to the address of the user who finds it, right? And ckdb is still "as-is" in this repo?
That's correct, though there is the ckpool-splns fork which does all the apportioning of reward via coinbase generation without a database, as used on ckpool.org

is that fork public?

edit: nevermind i found it

so, ckpool-splns changes that control the coinbase generation are in stratifier? Is it all documented only in code? or also in a readme somewhere?
Only in code. The code was meant only for my pool but I promised the users to make all the code fully open for verification.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
WBF1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 418
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:32:57 AM
 #336

hi ck and kano

sorry to hear about the falling out.

without ckdb, there's no "easy way" to have ckpool set the generation address to the address of the user who finds it, right? And ckdb is still "as-is" in this repo?
That's correct, though there is the ckpool-splns fork which does all the apportioning of reward via coinbase generation without a database, as used on ckpool.org

is that fork public?

edit: nevermind i found it

so, ckpool-splns changes that control the coinbase generation are in stratifier? Is it all documented only in code? or also in a readme somewhere?
Only in code. The code was meant only for my pool but I promised the users to make all the code fully open for verification.

Got it. So if I compile and run the splns fork I can expect it to work like your splns pool @ ckpool.org?

Anonymous, no-registration, no-frills BCH Mining - http://luckypool.co - Get Lucky Today!
rldleblanc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 22, 2017, 12:09:43 AM
 #337


That's correct, though there is the ckpool-splns fork which does all the apportioning of reward via coinbase generation without a database, as used on ckpool.org

Does the SPLNS fork give the block finder a bonus in the block like p2pool does?
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1110


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 22, 2017, 12:28:30 AM
 #338


That's correct, though there is the ckpool-splns fork which does all the apportioning of reward via coinbase generation without a database, as used on ckpool.org

Does the SPLNS fork give the block finder a bonus in the block like p2pool does?
No. It gives a small bonus for their next block found only. It can be a substantial bonus if they're a very small miner only.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
optiroamru
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 26, 2017, 10:24:31 PM
 #339

Hello,

Than it can be treated?
doindex() ? Huh

Quote
[Tue Dec 26 18:52:23.898781 2017] [:error] [pid 7865] [client ip:35162] PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function doindex() in /home/user/ckpool/pool/page.php:594\nStack trace:\n#0
/home/user/ckpool/pool/page_index.php(7): gopage(Array, NULL, 'doindex', 'index', Array, '', false)\n#1
/home/user/ckpool/pool/base.php(455): show_index(Array, 'index', Array, '', false)\n#2
/home/user/ckpool/pool/prime.php(49): showPage(Array, 'index', Array, '', false)\n#3
/home/user/ckpool/pool/prime.php(117): process(NULL, false, Array)\n#4
/home/user/ckpool/pool/prime.php(128): check()\n#5
/home/user/ckpool/html/index.php(2): include_once('/home/user/ck...')\n#6 {main}\n  thrown in /home/user/ckpool/pool/page.php on line 594

Thank.
WBF1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 418
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 11, 2018, 09:41:13 PM
 #340

@-ck

I get a segfault with ckpool-splns. It is easily reproducible and so is the fix.

When starting with empty/nonexistant log directories and sock directories, ckpool starts but segfaults as soon as it connects to a bitcoind.

Fix I stumbled upon is to run non-splns ckpool for a bit, then close and run ckpool-splns. No segfaults.

Sorry if this is documented somewhere. Bitbucket seems to have been a mess lately.

Anonymous, no-registration, no-frills BCH Mining - http://luckypool.co - Get Lucky Today!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!