|
Aalesund
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 07:58:37 PM |
|
I have a simple question.
With this stats:
Total hashing power: 3.8TH/s
Next GH/s cost: 0.74 BTC
If I make a deposit of 0.74 BTC and I take speed of 1 GH/s after how many days I will take rewards of 0.74 BTC +10% bonus (0.74 + 0.074 = 0.814 BTC total) ?
|
Let's color the MOON: YN4VBGgcmm7nAGqhc2zeUN7eJXCxfWyWGa
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
BobbyJo
|
|
September 05, 2013, 08:14:55 PM |
|
All current stats are on the front page.
|
|
|
|
|
ricciolone
|
|
September 05, 2013, 08:22:17 PM |
|
only 2.2 GH/s for 10 BTC deposited! It's really little
power...
and 3 year It's really a lot of time...
|
|
|
|
|
Chizbang
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
September 05, 2013, 08:32:23 PM |
|
For a test, I deposited 0.001 Bitcoins to the deposit address on my profile and its not showing on my profile. The transaction did send.
|
|
|
|
|
|
chriswen
|
|
September 06, 2013, 07:32:57 AM |
|
Great that the total hash rate is high, but I was seriously convinced that I and my sponsors would get the ASIC power I bought.. So that I benefit from ASIC infrastructure first and at completion my hashrate would go to the rest of the investors.. Is it only me that thinks that sounds fair? I mean it could even benefit everyone, as more people would invest because of a lower ROI. Also as a early investor I wouldn't mind that later investors get more hashrate because the technology has improved, because I know as soon as they finish, I get their hashing power.
Pyramining, would you mind telling us how many deopits (in BTC) are >90% done? Or even better, give us that statistic in every tenth percentile. It would be nice to know when to expect a bit of hash rate increase, since the system is different from what I thought it was.
You got the 50% bonus referral. |
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
September 06, 2013, 05:25:10 PM |
|
3.8TH!!!! Wow, in which pool are they hashing?
Almost all in p2pool. |
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
September 06, 2013, 05:27:03 PM |
|
Pyramining, would you mind telling us how many deopits (in BTC) are >90% done? Or even better, give us that statistic in every tenth percentile. It would be nice to know when to expect a bit of hash rate increase, since the system is different from what I thought it was.
Ok, I will consider to implement it. |
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
September 06, 2013, 05:28:03 PM |
|
Sorry for the short answers, I still have some works to do, however the biggest part has been done!
|
|
|
|
|
|
maxl
|
|
September 06, 2013, 07:38:25 PM |
|
Great work pyramining. It´s nice to see such a high hashpower is online now.
Is it planned that there will be more hashpower deployed in near future. When there will be more BTC invested.
|
|
|
|
|
bradyon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
TradeFortress has to pay his debitors
|
|
September 06, 2013, 07:49:48 PM |
|
Grrrrreat work  |
|
|
|
|
|
platti
|
|
September 09, 2013, 10:42:12 PM |
|
bad luck on p2pool :-(
Pool Hashrate: 11951.8 GH/sEstimated Time to Block: 8h40m Current Round: 2d4m
|
|
|
|
|
pyromaniac
|
|
September 09, 2013, 10:56:58 PM |
|
bad luck on p2pool :-(
Pool Hashrate: 11951.8 GH/sEstimated Time to Block: 8h40m Current Round: 2d4m
And hashrate will fall down. I'd recommend to pyramining use poolhopping with multiple pools. |
|
|
|
|
JayCoin
|
|
September 10, 2013, 02:11:00 PM |
|
Please don't pool hop. Most pools punish pool hopping unless your using PPS. We just need to stay the course with P2Pool.
|
Hello There!
|
|
|
|
platti
|
|
September 10, 2013, 06:04:09 PM |
|
why do we need to mine with that ugly p2pool?
99,9% of bitcoin-network is NOT mining with this pool, and they are all wrong?
I couln't believe that
|
|
|
|
|
Krak
|
|
September 10, 2013, 06:16:08 PM |
|
99,9% of bitcoin-network is NOT mining with this pool, and they are all wrong?
I couln't believe that
That's exactly why more people should be mining with p2pool. Please stop your uninformed complaining. |
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
|
pyromaniac
|
|
September 10, 2013, 08:12:34 PM |
|
Bad luck again. A few very long blocks is a trend. I don't see any reasons to use this pool anymore. At least to use only it.
|
|
|
|
bradyon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
TradeFortress has to pay his debitors
|
|
September 12, 2013, 06:08:46 AM |
|
seems p2pool´s variance likes to bother us all. Quite difficult to believe it´s random and nobody behind it having a fun time out of our tension.... Nevertheless patience proves again to be the solution to many concerns. Peace |
|
|
|
|
|
Krak
|
|
September 12, 2013, 06:26:26 AM |
|
seems p2pool´s variance likes to bother us all. Quite difficult to believe it´s random and nobody behind it having a fun time out of our tension.... Nevertheless patience proves again to be the solution to many concerns. Peace Right, just ignore those 7 lucky blocks found in the past 24 hours. |
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
bradyon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
TradeFortress has to pay his debitors
|
|
September 12, 2013, 02:55:58 PM |
|
Pyramining I´m curious...
Do you plan to keep on adding your own hardware the next few weeks or maybe there is some other product at your reach which could beat your hardware´s performance.
Don´t want to steal much of your precious time elaborating a long answer. Just, is there other overally worthy hardware or is yours currently still unbeatable in the short term?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
jargoman
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
September 13, 2013, 12:06:25 AM |
|
Pyramining I´m curious...
Do you plan to keep on adding your own hardware the next few weeks or maybe there is some other product at your reach which could beat your hardware´s performance.
Don´t want to steal much of your precious time elaborating a long answer. Just, is there other overally worthy hardware or is yours currently still unbeatable in the short term?
Thanks!
He's producing his own asics, all new deposits go to asics New infrastructure: ~ 2127.66 MH/BTC |
|
|
|
|
