i agree with everything that relm9 says , and i wanted to hit that yes, but i can't because its not Hazards fault in the same way that a surfer gets eaten by a shark.
every time someone in Australia gets eaten by a shark, the family always usually says " don't hunt it down , its just doing what a shark does"
this board could have been shark netted. with 100% accuracy , Mod asked , he was told no.
But if one shark keeps eating all the new surfers, there will be no surfers left. Banning will do little good but not banning will do real harm.
Imagine how many more people would be trading today if they hadn't been burned by this guys waterhole poisoning! You guys would be legitimate millionaires by now if all those people had a good first experience with altcoins. All he has done is drive people back to the false security of fiat banker monopolies.
What we need is a list of his alternate forum accounts, coins created by both Hazard and shakezula, and bounty for post their home address. We can start by looking at who voted no in this poll. They didn't just teach us about shitcoins, they set back the entire crypto movement by at least 2 generations and directly inspired articles such as
http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelbobelian/2014/05/09/sec-warns-investors-to-beware-of-bitcoin/ and
http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2014/03/02/don-bitconned-digital-currencies-pose-hazards-for-investors/Xm6ew62ZPMV7kL27GC7wWP/story.html and, as some would say, are
singlehandedly responsible for the ban of all crypto in multiple countries. How in the fuck does that help us?
What was your stupid ass excuse for voting no again?
Poll
