[ANN][CLOAK] Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digital Currency

[CloakCoinScam]

Haha men you are the dreamer............ CLOAK to $50!!! LOL   

NOT anytime soon. All you guy do is the speculation of the crypto........ that does not mean its going that high. NO Reason to.. the bull market is OVER ok?

Lets think about this for a second.... it takes a time and energy to  come up with FUD about something. The main reasoning behind FUD is usually  to change someone's behavior.  However to come up with FUD is not a simple process and involves many steps. 

Firstly  one has to get a good nights sleep( 8 hours preferably ); next dedicate brain cells  throughout the waking day to come up with  creative FUD  ideas; eat 3 square meals a day so hunger pangs are satisfied ( you can't focus  on FUD generation  on an empty stomach ).

...but this is not all

You also have to find a  device to post the FUD so it reaches the masses, use a spell checker,  get an internet connection, kick the dog etc .
My point is if Cloakcoinscam is willing to commit this many  of his  resources to FUD'ng  Cloak, then CLOAKCOIN   must be  a dammed good coin.

...So HODDL that cloak, this is at least a  $50  coin in 2018.

LMAO!  Good one....

  ROFL you've made my day man

Haha my boys.. my boys. You are the DREAMERS if u are the thinking CLOAK will go to $50.............................. L O L.

What is your basis? I have said since DAY ONE it will be going down....it will collapse!!!!!!!!!! IT HAS COLLAPSED.

I have said since 230K Satoshi price that it will collapse to 50-60K....... it WENT THERE. We are now floating @ 80-85K with NO reason to go higher other than your memes ok?

You guys think I am the evil man...... well you guy are just as the evil by saying it will go to MOON. It has not gone to moon yet has it? No? That's what I thought my bros.

I have said it will collapse. IT HAS COLLAPSED many times since I have said so.

Cloakcoinscam = correct on his analysis
Others = All hype... no action.. no results. Lets spam our rocket memes and try and sell t-shirts lol.. COME ON boys get it together will you

IT IS NOT GOING TO $50 PROVE ME WRONG RIGHT NOW/!}[

I know why you write all sorts of nonsense here. You just sold a cloak for $ 1 am I right? HAHAHAAH

HAHHHAHHAHAHA SO FUNNEH MAN HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA U DA BEST LOL

U will sell CLOAK @ less than $1 lol watch n see. I have always been right about the collapse of the CLOAK..................... look at my old posts for proof. Take ur memes else where ok?

Thx broski

[1714064468]

1714064468

[bon3s90]

HAHHHAHHAHAHA SO FUNNEH MAN HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA U DA BEST LOL

U will sell CLOAK @ less than $1 lol watch n see. I have always been right about the collapse of the CLOAK..................... look at my old posts for proof. Take ur memes else where ok?

Thx broski

Did you take a look at the $ price? it's doing good at the moment ;-) I think you are totally wrong, don't know y you hate cloak but it's not that bad as you trying to say

[anneke2001]

There used to be some sort of user, I won't mention his/her name in here.. Who totally forgot about his Monero.. Now he's rich.

So you see, it's all about HODL ! On alts with a good history, so You know what you are Doing !

Point being? RISE on, don't be greedy, double down if needed !


Repeat after me: "I.. will. HODL, I am responsible for my own money!"


Besides, there's lots of good things to come at end of Q4 (check roadmap) and Q1. With new exchangers added & more. Cloakcoin is a privacycoin & people whore for privacy these days.

Short termers looking for profit now.


hodl you around, see you, annelore

[hybrid_x]

Just sold all my NAV and put into CLOAK...... I support privacy tokens and this is the best one after researching.

[anneke2001]

After Q4 and Q1, let's talk.

Welcome aboard hybrid_x.
Cloakcoin is not priced in yet.

[GreenRivers]

There is no true complete privacy on blockchain, everything is traceable... and that is the beauty of it

[morkriger]

There is no true complete privacy on blockchain, everything is traceable... and that is the beauty of it

Hehe agree. they know it, and when I say "they". I reffer THEY not only cloak team, THEY, the untraceable, tha invisible, they whose always are watching... (just kidding hehe... or... not?).

[anneke2001]

If you've studied cryptography you'll know you're talking off you neck. Cryptography done well can be highly secure. Yes, you can have built in trapdoors but it all depends on the algorithm you're using, and your cryptosystem in whole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip_rNAASt6I

NSA Would have weakened the Lucifer algorithm before accepting it as a standard, it was too heavy for them

[Cloverfield]

CloakCoin is still one of the better looking projects. Offcourse the open Source code is taking quite a while and people searching for short term returns are dissapointed at this time.
But me, as a long term believer, I am not worried about it. Better come out with a good working code than rushing into coming out with a code full of flaws.
Price was indeed going lower, but as everything did and BTC grew more and more it was an easy prediction.
I won't do any predictions, but it will be earlier higher than lower from this point.

[CaptNemo]

CloakCoinScam, please give us more wisdom and tell us what coins to invest in? or can you only cut and paste and keep saying the same thing like "scam"

[Nathan047]

There is no true complete privacy on blockchain, everything is traceable... and that is the beauty of it

It all depends on what you mean by traceable. If you're talking about knowing who sent or received coins than there is no traceability using certain systems.

NSA Would have weakened the Lucifer algorithm before accepting it as a standard, it was too heavy for them

Perhaps I should know this since I consider myself somewhat knowledgeable in cryptocurrencies, but what's the Lucifer algorithm?

[lab rat hoax]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bU9PWsbXQuM/maxresdefault.jpg

[anneke2001]

This is Lucifer described and the case with NSA turning it down:
http://derekbruff.org/blogs/fywscrypto/tag/lucifer/

It was good, but NSA wanted it weakened so they can get in, if shit hits the fan.

[anneke2001]

So now they all want BTC, a coin with a block_size limit coming.

Am I right that block height numbers of BTC transactions use two's complement for counting on and on?

If you see it binary, when the most significant bit (the token bit) is set, the block height numbers become NEGATIVE !

Am I right?

http://www.convertforfree.com/twos-complement-calculator/

[anneke2001]

BTC blockchain limit being 1MB for max tranactions in two's complement

transactions possible:>>> 1024d * 1024d = 1 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000‬b
current blockheight: ---> 495130d =          0 0111 1000 1110 0001 1010b   

Turn on the leftmost bit, the sign bit in a two's complement representation of computer maths, and you have a negative blockheight.
Someone could code some countdown for until that will happen.

Only a blockheight of 1048575 will fit in the algo like we know it. Add one, and it's '-1'.

Am I dead wrong or what?

Someone, set up a countdown website for that please, linked to the blocks coming in. ehehe.
A new project is born.

[anneke2001]

So now Zimbabwe is buying a coin that can't perform. Good luck to them.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/16/investing/bitcoin-zimbabwe-price/index.html

Well, AcquireCryptContext some more for BTC, we have our own safe coin.

[R-J-F]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bU9PWsbXQuM/maxresdefault.jpg

Good one!

[R-J-F]

Bid walls growing on cryptsy and bittrex, good to see this king place.This little dumps had no affect.  The eye from investors is growing!We are able to say it once again: InchHide STRONG"ta

cryptsy? Huh? Do you have time machine? If so, I'll invest!

 

[R-J-F]

So now Zimbabwe is buying a coin that can't perform. Good luck to them.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/16/investing/bitcoin-zimbabwe-price/index.html

Well, AcquireCryptContext some more for BTC, we have our own safe coin.

The country with the Trillion dollar pack of Bubble Gum? It will work for them...

[Nathan047]

This is Lucifer described and the case with NSA turning it down:
http://derekbruff.org/blogs/fywscrypto/tag/lucifer/

It was good, but NSA wanted it weakened so they can get in, if shit hits the fan.

I guess you learn something new every day, thanks for digging that up for me.