Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2017, 04:57:15 PM *
News: If the forum does not load normally for you, please send me a traceroute.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Optimize hashrate for 5850  (Read 4733 times)
heinz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
May 24, 2012, 08:42:04 PM
 #21

0.96 volts(cgminer shows 0.959),  835 core, 150 mem, 344 Mhash ( a grand total of 80 watts per 5850)

This is what I have installed and it also gets rid of pesky 100% cpu bug.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52143.msg653435#msg653435
1493571435
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493571435

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493571435
Reply with quote  #2

1493571435
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1493571435
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493571435

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493571435
Reply with quote  #2

1493571435
Report to moderator
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile
May 25, 2012, 02:27:34 AM
 #22

I got a dud 5850___and 2.5 SDK.
Find the failure. ^^

I was under the impression that 2.5 worked just as well as 2.4. It was 2.6 that gave ~10% lower hash rates. Also, what does the SDK have to do with not being able to OC? My 5870 and 5830 OC to 960 and 940, respectively. My 5850 only goes to 875.
I just mean your hashrate buddy, can be 350mh/s @ 860mhz.

Ya you're totally right. I was at work and got the numbers wrong. I just checked and it's doing ~354MH/s @ 865. Damn you were pretty close!

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
Dargo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652



View Profile
May 29, 2012, 03:50:27 PM
 #23

I just switched from BAMT (using Phoenix2) to cgminer (with the default kernel) running on the Peppermint Two 64 bit edition linux distro. I'm seeing ~2% increase in efficiency and I can clock my cards a bit higher than I could with BAMT. The difference could be due to switching from 32 bit to 64 bit, but whatever the reason, it's a nice little improvement for my 5850s. The desktop is also much more usable (much quicker) than it was with BAMT.
oldDirty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


roundhouseminer


View Profile
May 29, 2012, 07:44:03 PM
 #24


Ya you're totally right. I was at work and got the numbers wrong. I just checked and it's doing ~354MH/s @ 865. Damn you were pretty close!
yap. ^^

CrunchingCulture

/// FREE ASSANGE \\\
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!