CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

btw - did mention a few hundred times already that the spreadminer-spmod9 STILL doesnt compile ... how about supplying a product that works - when we pay for it and boost your farm cashflow ...

You payed for speadminer #1 and got 8 free updates. In the latest update you need to fix the makefile because some of the filenames have changed. I have made a cuda 8.0 build for you for free. (exe file)

1. Compare the visual studio project file from version 7 to version 9
2. Add the changes in the makefile by renaming the files like I have done in the Windows project file

It will take you 10 minutes.

[1713590964]

1713590964

[1713590964]

1713590964

[1713590964]

1713590964

[1713590964]

1713590964

[bensam1231]

Better this way.
If you quit it would also be better to refund your customers, due your inhability fo fulfill your agreements.

And what is the agreement? That if another coder decide to optimize the opensource, I need to send out another faster version?
This is not how private kernels work.

My claims are:

(LBRY SP-mod #3 released 3 september)

LBRY sp-mod #3 vs opensource 1.8.1
Faster compute 5.0 +5-7% (750,750ti,960m)
Faster compute 5.2 +10-25% (950,960,970,980,980ti,titanx)
Faster compute 6.1 +5-11% (1070,1080) (gtx 1060 0%)

But after 1.8.3 came on the 28 sept. I haven't recieved any more donations

http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/ccminer-1-8-3/

That is exactly how it works. The incentive for you to continue providing support and updates to your program is the 3.3% fee. If there is no continued support, there doesn't need to be any incentive.

"But after 1.8.3 came on the 28 sept. I haven't recieved any more donations"

What is a dev fee for 500 bob. I'm sure it didn't 100% stop after Epsylons came out. On top of it, if you released a faster version you'd get your 3.3% back.

To keep supporting the ones that paid you.

And after I release #4, the opensource will be optimized by somebody else. And you still loose.

Learn to encrypt shit dude and protect your work. Claymore does it. Not our problem as customers.

From a miner's perspective, the future success of a coin doesn't matter.
If you wanna hold, you'd better buy.
Mining is about hashrate and efficiency.
Mine and sell: you make more money and you can buy whatever coins you want with that (even non-pow ones).

Yup and cards that cost half as much as producing the same amount of hashrate. It has nothing to do with resale prices. On top of that they aren't super inefficient. Efficiency matters only when we start getting anywhere close to the price of power, which we haven't (assuming $.1 Kwh, which is average in the US).

[Nikolaj]

To keep supporting the ones that paid you.

And after I release #4, the opensource will be optimized by somebody else. And you still loose.

 

No, dear. WE still loose, especially if we pay YOU to keep developing kernels for YOUR farm. Who really losses it's you; 0.2 (didn't remember if I paid you more before, another 0.1 for another kernel..) instead of a potential collaboration in the long term, I am creating a farm in iceland and needed honest devs. You will be totally delisted from my projects, regarding mining and any other venture. Good for you indeed

Take care, you won't get any more dime from me.

As bensam said, your words doesen't make any sense, anymore (like this thread)

nikolaj - i did this a long time ago ... sp got 'donation' after 'donation' from me - as well as mining - as well as buying private miners - as well as massive amounts of time and effort testing these miners he has released ... and he STILL refuses to fix the spreadminer-spmod9 saying that its good exercise for me to fix his mistakes in the makefile ... come on ...

sp - read above mate ... look and learn that the community members that once were behind you 100% - are now totally against you because you have become the ONE thing you said you would never be - one hell of a greedy bastard ...

the last couple of months have been great - as we have made leaps and bounds surpassing your hashrates with our miner ... for MONTHS ... you heard right ...

ive asked and asked and asked for your help and for the sources / miners you promised - until i gave up ... which is what built that farm you have - completely off our backs ... and you wont even supply us a miner that compiles? ... you have a broken source and you supply that? ... then tell me i need to fix it? ...

hehehe ... if that isnt pure and utter gluttony on your part - i dunno what is ...

retire - and live off what you make from this farm of yours ... because soon - thefarm and the design and the hashrate - is going to make your look a kiddies toy ...

im just waiting for the 1080ti to be released before i bulk buy and build ...

btw - did mention a few hundred times already that the spreadminer-spmod9 STILL doesnt compile ... how about supplying a product that works - when we pay for it and boost your farm cashflow ...

nikolaj - i would be happy to discuss further developments with you mate ... you sound like an honest hard worker ... let me know - maybe we could do something here ...

#crysx

+1

we will for sure. Other than mechanical solutions, my team have developed an alternative version of USB riser, that could be powered also with 6 and 8 pin PCI connector, but also custom cables with gold pins and 16/12AWG standards (compatibile with the power delivery that we're studying, up to 2400w platinum for the VGA's and alternative riser/riser card - that I would like to create up to 7/8 VGA per 4U/5U chassis). I'll send you details soon, also a report about my projects in the mid and long term. Thank you for the kind words, as you can see even with my sign I am putting my face and reputation in these projects. Thankfully it seems that we won't even need to resell them, due a massive, mid-term, usage in iceland.

I'll contact you later on skype. Take care.

Yup and cards that cost half as much as producing the same amount of hashrate. It has nothing to do with resale prices. On top of that they aren't super inefficient. Efficiency matters only when we start getting anywhere close to the price of power, which we haven't (assuming $.1 Kwh, which is average in the US).

yep, totally agree 

[bensam1231]

It is curious, even after all of this time, Ethereum reigns king. I don't think anyone can dispute that. However, despite this, none of the Nvidia developers have put out Ethereum miners. Not so much that we need another Ethereum miner, rather a dual miner that is made and optimized for Nvidia would definitely be a great idea considering how we have to keep going back to Ethereum.

That being said, there are still other coins I've already mentioned before the Zcash launch that no one has taken a look at that really need Nvidia miners, they need to be fixed, or they need to be optimized. Like there are options. You don't need to do what everyone else is doing. Pallas's XCN miner is still dangling in the wind for the last 4-5 months? Others and myself have already mentioned that we'd be willing to donate and we can't even throw money at it.

[tbearhere]

i was able to reach 33 sol per 1070, without any oc, i dunno why but when i underclock mem i get higher hash, tdp is at 50% pretty much like when i mine lbry, core is 0%

How many cards and which miner?

6 x 1070 x 33H/s = 198H/s, miner is the one of nicehash 3a, just need some tweak depend on your gpu

My 2x 750ti cards this 4 core computer are doing 40 sols .. so 6 x 750ti x 20sols/s = 120 sols/s.  

one 750Ti give only 10 sols , and 20 sols give your CPU

On my 4 core.. 1 750ti gives 23 sol/s
2 750ti  38 sols/s
2 750ti  plus  -t 3  40 sols/s

[tbearhere]

6 iterations per second CAN lead to 140 sol/s.
Just run multiple nonces per iteration.
It all depends on how you define an "iteration".

pallas  how do you run multiple nonces per iteration plz?  thx

[pallas]

6 iterations per second CAN lead to 140 sol/s.
Just run multiple nonces per iteration.
It all depends on how you define an "iteration".

pallas  how do you run multiple nonces per iteration plz?  thx

You need to rewrite the miner :-)

[Amph]

6 iterations per second CAN lead to 140 sol/s.
Just run multiple nonces per iteration.
It all depends on how you define an "iteration".

pallas  how do you run multiple nonces per iteration plz?  thx

You need to rewrite the miner :-)

are you working on something about zcash?

[tbearhere]

6 iterations per second CAN lead to 140 sol/s.
Just run multiple nonces per iteration.
It all depends on how you define an "iteration".

pallas  how do you run multiple nonces per iteration plz?  thx

You need to rewrite the miner :-)

ooooo ok     thx

[joblo]

6 iterations per second CAN lead to 140 sol/s.
Just run multiple nonces per iteration.
It all depends on how you define an "iteration".

pallas  how do you run multiple nonces per iteration plz?  thx

You need to rewrite the miner :-)

ooooo ok     thx

Not relevant to equihash, but cpuminer hashes one nonce per thread. It's possible because of the reatively low number
of threads as each nonce needs it's own working buffer. On a GPU you can only hash as many nonces as resources allow.
With thousands of cores the cpuminer model won't work but you can run multiple threads cooperatively
hashing the same nonce.

I don't know how multithreading works with nheqminer.

[bensam1231]

6 iterations per second CAN lead to 140 sol/s.
Just run multiple nonces per iteration.
It all depends on how you define an "iteration".

pallas  how do you run multiple nonces per iteration plz?  thx

You need to rewrite the miner :-)

ooooo ok     thx

Not relevant to equihash, but cpuminer hashes one nonce per thread. It's possible because of the reatively low number
of threads as each nonce needs it's own working buffer. On a GPU you can only hash as many nonces as resources allow.
With thousands of cores the cpuminer model won't work but you can run multiple threads cooperatively
hashing the same nonce.

I don't know how multithreading works with nheqminer.

Interesting... It's been mentioned a few different times that Trumps miners are all adaptations of the CPU miner and aren't very well optimized. I'd assume that would also apply to NHEQ as the performance for it isn't that amazing.

[tc61]

does anyone have a good -l launch config for a gtx 960 on ccminer-cryptonighht ... im getting better results from a 750ti..so i must have something wrong

[scryptr]

does anyone have a good -l launch config for a gtx 960 on ccminer-cryptonighht ... im getting better results from a 750ti..so i must have something wrong

GTX 960 AND CRYPTONIGHT--

I get somewhat similar results.  The GTX 960 is slightly faster, but not by much.       --scryptr

[antantti]

does anyone have a good -l launch config for a gtx 960 on ccminer-cryptonighht ... im getting better results from a 750ti..so i must have something wrong

GTX 960 AND CRYPTONIGHT--

I get somewhat similar results.  The GTX 960 is slightly faster, but not by much.       --scryptr

960 likes compute heavy algos, not sure if there are profitable ones atm.

960 made 11MH on eth when 750ti did 10MH.

[sp_]

If you missed the Zcash train, there is another clone that just came...

[ANN] Zclassic, Zcash Fork No Premine, No 20% Founders Tax


http://zclassic.org



thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671982.0

exchanges:

https://c-cex.com/?p=zcl-btc
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=ZCL_BTC



pools:

https://pool.mn/zclassic
https://www2.coinmine.pl/zcl
https://zclassic.miningpoolhub.com
https://zcl.suprnova.cc/

[Amph]

yeah zclassic another clone, with higher diff, and less profit, maybe it was good for the first day, now it's worse than vanilla zcash

better to mine zcash, it will end the same as eth classic vs ethereum

[sp_]

yeah zclassic another clone, with higher diff, and less profit

-NO FOUNDERS TAX
-NO SLOW START
-TRUSTED PARAMETERS



70BTC volume in 24h on C-Cex. Will probobly be listed at poloniex and bittrex soon...

Zcash calculators doesn't work on Zcash classic because there is no slow start.

[Amph]

yeah zclassic another clone, with higher diff, and less profit

-NO FOUNDERS TAX
-NO SLOW START
-TRUSTED PARAMETERS



70BTC volume in 24h on C-Cex. Will probobly be listed at poloniex and bittrex soon...

Zcash calculators doesn't work on Zcash classic because there is no slow start.

i just tested at coinmine no calculator, and i was receiving equal or less profit than zcash

and they also said the same thing about etheruem classic, no premine no crap and stuff like that, but look, it's always behind the real etheruem

[sp_]

ETC is different because the existing Etherum owners got free ETC when it forked. ZCL is a copycoin that restarted on block 0 and give 100% of the payouts to the miners, so you get a fair distrubution and avoid dumping from the investors/developers.  

The nethash is currently

780 235 Sol/s (26 100 gtx 1070's with the genoil miner)
 

[meeekz]

Could someone please give me a starting point for mining zcash or eth?  I have a 6900K cpu and a GTX1070.  This is not a standalone mining machine.

1) What miner should I use?
2) Would getting another GTX1070 (sli) be worthwhile?
3) What should I expect in hash performance?