CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[ioglnx]

The diff on many pools increased lately..and some pools have strange bumps of hashing power one e.g sometimes 4197276.29 Sol/s and you get nothing from the cake and next moment its 50% less.
Big farms are playing bad with us private miners :-(

[1713564946]

1713564946

[1713564946]

1713564946

[1713564946]

1713564946

[mo35]

tested on 1080 with -t 0 , single card 66-70 sols , basically same as Zawawas r6 cygwin version. not able to test on 1070 box , no AVX2 in maining rigs

[antantti]

Right now 32MH on dagger earns more than 140s/s equihash.

Fast cuda equihashminer has fallen from 'urgently needed' to 'nice to have' category.

[pokeytex]

Right now 32MH on dagger earns more than 140s/s equihash.

Fast cuda equihashminer has fallen from 'urgently needed' to 'nice to have' category.

@antantti what is the best way to mine Eth (dagger I assume?) for 1070's?

[bathrobehero]

sp_: didn't i mentioned only GTX10xx ;-D
Where is your colored output.

I compiled only SM61,CM61 you need a SM52 right?

This is great, a 6 x 1070 rig climbs up to ~490 sol/s (so 81.6 per card) in a minute or so then it's slowly decreasing and slowly fluctuating between 462-475.

Could you please compile a version with SM50? For 750 Ti support.

[antantti]

@antantti what is the best way to mine Eth (dagger I assume?) for 1070's?

Same as with every other gpu. Find a pool that works for you. Find a miner that works for you.

If you have enough hashing power and a low latency network connection you should go solo. Solo doesn't mean eth only in claymore's miner.

[krnlx]

doesn't work..

I am testing on gtx 970

Maybe It is because different numbers of SM on 970, but I hardcoded BLOCKS and THREADS number, due to silentarmy algo worksize=NR_ROWS, so in cuda blocks=NR_ROWS/THREAD_PER_BLOCK. I don't have 970 cards, but a have 980, will take a look tomorrow.

UPD. It seems you are running with bad options, because launching cuda_tromp_STUB
Start options are buggy, only works with

Code:

./nheqminer_cuda_sa -t 0 -cv 0 -cd 0 -cs -l SERVER:PORT -u USERNAME

UPD2.

Tpruvot added my port to his repo. I think, he fixed launch bugs.

https://github.com/tpruvot/nheqminer/tree/cuda-silentarmy

[ioglnx]

Interesting don't have any issue..but I do not even include tromp in the build just XENONCAT and SILENTARMY :-D as i stated

[Amph]

Right now 32MH on dagger earns more than 140s/s equihash.

Fast cuda equihashminer has fallen from 'urgently needed' to 'nice to have' category.

@antantti what is the best way to mine Eth (dagger I assume?) for 1070's?

what you mean best way, you just need to overclock the mem to 600+ with dagger, and you should be ale to reach 32MH

last tiem i tried it was something like 55% tdp +100 core +600mem or 800+

[sp_]

Maybe It is because different numbers of SM on 970, but I hardcoded BLOCKS and THREADS number, due to silentarmy algo worksize=NR_ROWS, so in cuda blocks=NR_ROWS/THREAD_PER_BLOCK. I don't have 970 cards, but a have 980, will take a look tomorrow.

I have fixed it now. I have started modding, and get 50 sol/s on the gtx 970 and 75sol/s on the 1070 standard clocks.
The power usage is only 60Watt in the wall for the 970 and 95W on the 1070.

[lawrencelyl]

Maybe It is because different numbers of SM on 970, but I hardcoded BLOCKS and THREADS number, due to silentarmy algo worksize=NR_ROWS, so in cuda blocks=NR_ROWS/THREAD_PER_BLOCK. I don't have 970 cards, but a have 980, will take a look tomorrow.

I have fixed it now. I have started modding, and get 50 sol/s on the gtx 970 and 75sol/s on the 1070 standard clocks.
The power usage is only 60Watt in the wall for the 970 and 95W on the 1070.

Any chance for you to publish your fixed miner?

[sp_]

yes, but after I push it to 100

[bensam1231]

zclassic is not too far from etheruem now, there is still profit and it consume less, i still prefer to mine it over thereum due to not need to overclock my memory too much

You mean far behind? You have to have really expensive power for it to be close. I'm making $2.3 per 1070 at 32hash before power.

$2.3 mean that you pay basically zero electricity, sure i have not zero electricity, at leats by looking at whattomine, it say around $2 with a single 1070

As I've mentioned multiple times, $.1 KWH. That's AVERAGE for the US. That's not low and it's not high. Equihash is now making $1.47 pure revenue. That's why no one includes electricity costs, because it's different for everyone. You ALWAYS include electricity, regardless of your ridiculously high costs that most people don't have because they're operating close to the AVERAGE.


Weird how many times I have to respond in this thread to people saying the same stuff and asking the same questions. Ethereum is with a 700mhz OC. You can earn a extra $.3 per 1070 by dual mining. Equihash was more profitable for a bit, but it's back to Ethereum.

yes, but after I push it to 100

Getting 80 right now on SA5. Claymore v6 is promising 200sol on a nano.

[pallas]

Even in europe there are companies claiming to sell electricity for 0.06 / KWh.
Truth is if you divide the total bill cost by the number of KWh, you get much more than that.
I hope everybody did this calculation at least one time before mining hard.

[bensam1231]

Even in europe there are companies claiming to sell electricity for 0.06 / KWh.
Truth is if you divide the total bill cost by the number of KWh, you get much more than that.
I hope everybody did this calculation at least one time before mining hard.

And everyones bills with fees is different. My quoted price is $.09, but with fees it's $.11. It still doesn't matter and isn't applicable to everyone as someone living in some other part of the US is going to be paying a city and county tax that I don't, because I don't live there and I'm not them.

That's why we talk about revenue and not energy cost and when we do talk about energy we talk about power consumption numbers as everyone will probably be consuming the same amount of power (relatively). It's a little late in the game to only now realize there are added fees on your bill that you haven't ever been including. It's like no one read their $1,000 bill they've been getting every month up until now.

[sp_]

I managed to get 90sol/s on the gtx 1070 so far

Ready for ZCash sp-mod #1?

[ioglnx]

Maybe you can activate the console colors :-D
I have managed to upload my changes..my connection of UPC had problems since Saturday 6am..stupid provider.

[liomojo1]

Sadly the only good result for 1070 will be 2-3 times the one of 280x , so it should be about 250 on a card , but obviosly it is not achievable!

[lawrencelyl]

I managed to get 90sol/s on the gtx 1070 so far

Ready for ZCash sp-mod #1?

Looking good!

[Neosaan]

I managed to get 90sol/s on the gtx 1070 so far

Ready for ZCash sp-mod #1?

LLLOOOOOOOLLLLL



I also managed to get the same thing. Just pick up and collect for windows.