CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[papampi_2]

Is it possible to add support for ubuntu 18.04?
Giving error on compilation

Code:

./configure: line 6177: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 6177: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'

[1714029462]

1714029462

[sp_]

X16r/X16s/C11 Spmod-git #9 has been released.


The C11 has been added. (around +33% faster thn sp-mod git#8).. +5.3% faster than T-rex 0.6.1  on the gtx 970.

This miner is free and has no fee.

Cuda 9.2 binary:

-Added optimalizations to C11 (+33% faster)
-faster X16R/X16S (faster bmw, shavite-cubehash)
-removed the other algos. (optimalizations not added yet)

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases

source

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commits/master

[bensam1231]

Both 1.44 and 1.03 are shit profit when you add in electricity costs. Mining is shit now..

It's been that way for a few months, January onward was the worst time to get into crypto mining, almost as bad as the end of 2014, only everything didn't go completely negative at $.1KWH. We're pretty fricking close, but not there yet.

If BTC hits about 5.2k~ I'm pretty sure we'll be negative. It's tough to tell as people with more expensive power have already shut off their rigs, so when BTC and altcoin prices increase, revenue rises, so will hashrate to compensate and we'll be stuck in limbo for awhile until things really take off. How much 'dark' hash is around now? I have no idea. But that's a pretty big sponge to soak up revenue from now till... whenever?

If you have expensive power you should really consider selling your rigs. Take that for what you will.

[fr4nkthetank]

oh boy well do I have news for you hahahaha.  NVIDIA's Q1FY19 sheet says they sold 289$million of crypto-related GPU gear.  These are mostly high end, it comes out to 300k-350k 1080tis equivalents *most likely*.  Get this though, sold in the first quarter.  Who the hell bought so many gpus for  mining at that point is a big for me and why.  When we look at total GPU sales, we see that OEM sales were *lower* in the Q4 last year, vs 1st quarter this year, and a little lower in the 1st quarter of last year.  This means that OEM crypto sales jumped for 1 quarter only.  Now guidance says 0 expected sales for crypto, its 20% of Q1 level now.


The big money boyz all bought their hashing power at the worst possible moment and for the worst possible price.

[sp_]

C11 spmod-git9  (cuda 9.2) vs t-rex 0.6.1  (cuda 9.1) vs enemy 1.17 (cuda 9.2) vs alexis 1.0 (cuda 7.5)

Latest nvidia driver.

Testcard: asus 1080ti

memclock: -500
coreclock: +100
tdp: 90%

sp-modgit      t-rex 0.6.1     enemy 1.17      alexis 1.0
 
32.2 MHASH  32.5MHASH    31.8MHASH       30.2MHASH

memclock: +500
coreclock: +100
tdp: 90%

sp-modgit9      t-rex 0.6.1     enemy 1.17   alexis 1.0

34MHASH   32MHASH    31.5MHASH   31.5 MHASH


-My free opensource miner is around +6% faster than the miners from the GPL violators. And free without any fee.
-If you oc the memory and run the old alexis miner it performs equal to the latest z-enemy miner. And free without any fee.

[Mr.Spider703]

C11 spmod-git9  (cuda 9.2) vs t-rex 0.6.1  (cuda 9.1) vs enemy 1.17 (cuda 9.2) vs alexis 1.0 (cuda 7.5)

Latest nvidia driver.

Testcard: asus 1080ti

memclock: -500
coreclock: +100
tdp: 90%

sp-modgit      t-rex 0.6.1     enemy 1.17      alexis 1.0
 
32.2 MHASH  32.5MHASH    31.8MHASH       30.2MHASH

memclock: +500
coreclock: +100
tdp: 90%

sp-modgit9      t-rex 0.6.1     enemy 1.17   alexis 1.0

34MHASH   32MHASH    31.5MHASH   31.5 MHASH


-My free opensource miner is around +6% faster than the miners from the GPL violators. And free without any fee.
-If you oc the memory and run the old alexis miner it performs equal to the latest z-enemy miner. And free without any fee.

again, you're trying to deceive people, would you stop that?
you post screenshots from the console at the start. put a real comparison on the pool at two different addresses, one yours, the other z-enemy or t-rex on two identical rigs.
show that your miner gives more coins, and you can be trusted.
at the moment, in the console, your mainer draws a good speed, but at the output of coins loses to all miners

[sp_]

at the moment, in the console, your mainer draws a good speed, but at the output of coins loses to all miners

My code is based on ccminer 2.2.4 and opensource. The speed on the screen is correct, but if you mine a coin with a short blocktime you should reduce the intensity.

[stevascha]

C11 spmod-git9  (cuda 9.2) vs t-rex 0.6.1  (cuda 9.1) vs enemy 1.17 (cuda 9.2) vs alexis 1.0 (cuda 7.5)

Latest nvidia driver.

Testcard: asus 1080ti

memclock: -500
coreclock: +100
tdp: 90%

sp-modgit      t-rex 0.6.1     enemy 1.17      alexis 1.0
 
32.2 MHASH  32.5MHASH    31.8MHASH       30.2MHASH

memclock: +500
coreclock: +100
tdp: 90%

sp-modgit9      t-rex 0.6.1     enemy 1.17   alexis 1.0

34MHASH   32MHASH    31.5MHASH   31.5 MHASH


-My free opensource miner is around +6% faster than the miners from the GPL violators. And free without any fee.
-If you oc the memory and run the old alexis miner it performs equal to the latest z-enemy miner. And free without any fee.

again, you're trying to deceive people, would you stop that?
you post screenshots from the console at the start. put a real comparison on the pool at two different addresses, one yours, the other z-enemy or t-rex on two identical rigs.
show that your miner gives more coins, and you can be trusted.
at the moment, in the console, your mainer draws a good speed, but at the output of coins loses to all miners

could you test spmod again? i am curious why sp post like that
big thanks if you want test it again 

[sp_]

same card, same settings, 3 miners. ALGO: C11

alexis1.0, t-rex 0.6.1 (1% fee), spmod-git #9

testcard: asus 1080ti
coreclock: +100
memclock: +600
tdp: 100%

[jugger1028]

LoL, did you really just give results from a miner that just started up? Jesus dude.. And how is it the same settings? You have Alexis at 22 intensity, Trex at 20 intensity, and spmod at 24.4 intensity?

[scryptr]

LoL, did you really just give results from a miner that just started up? Jesus dude.. And how is it the same settings? You have Alexis at 22 intensity, Trex at 20 intensity, and spmod at 24.4 intensity?

TOP INTENSITY LIMITS--

I haven't bothered to test c11 yet, but each miner has a top-end limit to the intensity setting.  It is likely not possible to raise the intensity setting on any of the three miners.  Further, the top intensity setting possible is often not the best performance setting.       --scryptr

[badfad]

It would be a lot better if you would:
-post tests with your miner vs. other miners over a reasonable amount of time
-100%TDP means nothing, post Watts pls.
-you should know this.

[jugger1028]

LoL, did you really just give results from a miner that just started up? Jesus dude.. And how is it the same settings? You have Alexis at 22 intensity, Trex at 20 intensity, and spmod at 24.4 intensity?

TOP INTENSITY LIMITS--

I haven't bothered to test c11 yet, but each miner has a top-end limit to the intensity setting.  It is likely not possible to raise the intensity setting on any of the three miners.  Further, the top intensity setting possible is often not the best performance setting.       --scryptr

I hear what you're saying, but to post screenshots of the first 3 seconds and use that as legit results? Come on..

[sp_]

The miners can be downloaded and you can perform the tests yourself.
In my short test, they where run at default intensities. Higher intensities doesn't always produce a bether result. If you mine on a multipool with rapid block switching, you need low intensities. If you mine on a pool with 1 coin and long blocktime you can increase the intensity. The alexis miner cannot run on 24 intensity because it uses more memory than the spmod-git. t-rex doesn't seem to produce a bether result on -i 24, rather worse.. Cuda 9.1 might be bether than cuda 9.2. Build yourself, find the best settings and share them.

[bensam1231]

Based on early whispers I'm hearing the 20xx series isn't that great for crypto or games ('great' being infinitely faster then pascal). It's still faster, but not by nearly as much as Nvidia wants you to think, it's mainly about raytracing. So unless that can be repurposed the newer GPUs aren't that interesting or more power efficient.

I'm keeping a eye on eBay and people are starting to dump their GPUs. Depending on early benchmarks for the 20xx series it might be worth snatching these up if you're playing the long game.

SP I understand this is a epic thread, but you should consider making a discord channel. However it probably will be overrun with trolls.


Also Jugger will never be happy.

[Mr.Spider703]

previously, he bought miners because there was no choice. now the choice is more and the miner from the SP loses on all counts, you look at the hash that draws the console, you can draw anything. a real profit in coins - SP in lost
this has already been proven and not by one person, there are addresses where miners worked from SP_, z-enemy and t-rex.
the highest hash in the SP_ and the largest number of coins from enemy

[scryptr]

previously, he bought miners because there was no choice. now the choice is more and the miner from the SP loses on all counts, you look at the hash that draws the console, you can draw anything. a real profit in coins - SP in lost
this has already been proven and not by one person, there are addresses where miners worked from SP_, z-enemy and t-rex.
the highest hash in the SP_ and the largest number of coins from enemy

PLEASE LEAVE THE THREAD--

Nobody has proven anything about who's miner is best.  You just post your negative opinions and spite.  You talk like youve done crypto sunce day one, but your account is practically new.  It does not add up.       --scryptr

[Mr.Spider703]

previously, he bought miners because there was no choice. now the choice is more and the miner from the SP loses on all counts, you look at the hash that draws the console, you can draw anything. a real profit in coins - SP in lost
this has already been proven and not by one person, there are addresses where miners worked from SP_, z-enemy and t-rex.
the highest hash in the SP_ and the largest number of coins from enemy

PLEASE LEAVE THE THREAD--

Nobody has proven anything about who's miner is best.  You just post your negative opinions and spite.  You talk like youve done crypto sunce day one, but your account is practically new.  It does not add up.       --scryptr

the old one was hacked and stolen, so I have to write from it.
and that I still should to do, man sells its manners for 0.05 BTC so still and devfee 2%
I warn other users not to buy from him miner

[jugger1028]

Also Jugger will never be happy.

I have nothing against him, if he just put facts out there instead of conjecture and wild statements that have no basis in reality I wouldn't be so harsh on him. He's a dev, I'm a miner, i have a predisposition to like him but just when I start to soften up to him he turns into Trump and just spews a bunch of BS smoke and mirrors type shit. I'm just looking for honesty... Like posting a 3 second start up comparison, he does stuff like that constantly, I just feel he's fishin' for nubs for fees. The reason most devs make it hard to know the real hashrate stats is cuz most devs know next week another miner will be out there beating their stats. I hold no ill will towards him though.

[Mr.Spider703]

why do you think other developers do not put their work on github??? is the protection of the SP, who only does what takes other people's work, wind intensity and sells them as their work. Therefore, it is a negative. and these are the words of the developer who has studied all the works of SP and other miners