Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 09:56:34 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][GSX] Glowshares: Community Driven Blockchain Development  (Read 90471 times)
whisper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 267
Merit: 250


Learn to go against your mind


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 03:17:23 PM
 #241

hmm ico price was around 0.00033000 now is 0.00080000 I thing its more than double...
dragnar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 03:35:40 PM
 #242

So why should I buy this coin?
It doesn't seem to have any uses.

I will explain it to you after the price doubles again.
For all I know this could be a pump and dump.
What are you talking about, the price didn't double. It only moved up about 35%.

I am reading through all this, and I see nothing I can do with this coin.
Not even seeing a crappy gambling site.
The only thing that I'm seeing that is slightly different is a voting system.
Which is becoming common in new coins.
I'm honestly asking, what is so interesting/valuable about this coin?


many coins went down ( especially cons right after there ipo was released )  this coin went up and stay,s stable up ( meaning dev did not dump his self bought coins )

so every one see,s this coin make profit and is hopping in also ( making the price go up more ) Smiley especialy sins this was a ipo that was  not dumped to shit by a dev buying his own coins Tongue

lol no ty
CryptoApparel
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 03:45:22 PM
 #243

hmm ico price was around 0.00033000 now is 0.00080000 I thing its more than double...
Well I'm looking at the bittrex stats, I just started to look at this coin.
If you bought at ico than yeah you doubled.

But I still have to state the obvious, there is no logical reason to be buying right now.
There is nothing to do with the coin.
erwin45
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10

★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 03:52:06 PM
 #244

hmm ico price was around 0.00033000 now is 0.00080000 I thing its more than double...
Well I'm looking at the bittrex stats, I just started to look at this coin.
If you bought at ico than yeah you doubled.

But I still have to state the obvious, there is no logical reason to be buying right now.
There is nothing to do with the coin.

indeed there is none now, but  after dev delivers the project u wont see the coins at this price range anymore Smiley it will be much higher

Alt.Report
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 05:49:18 PM
 #245

Hello everyone,

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers
BittyBoBitty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 05:52:10 PM
 #246

Hello everyone,

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers

Been seeing you guys around lately. I love your site. Following Smiley
KidCrypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 06:21:09 PM
 #247

Hello everyone,

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers

Been seeing you guys around lately. I love your site. Following Smiley


Finally an organization that isn't trying to hide things from us. Going to be watching you guys. Thanks for your service to the community
LazerPanther
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 334
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 06:50:52 PM
 #248

Can you get that crap out of here and keep the thread on topic?
GucciCoign
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 06:53:45 PM
 #249

So why should I buy this coin?
It doesn't seem to have any uses.

I will explain it to you after the price doubles again.
For all I know this could be a pump and dump.
What are you talking about, the price didn't double. It only moved up about 35%.

I am reading through all this, and I see nothing I can do with this coin.
Not even seeing a crappy gambling site.
The only thing that I'm seeing that is slightly different is a voting system.
Which is becoming common in new coins.
I'm honestly asking, what is so interesting/valuable about this coin?


many coins went down ( especially cons right after there ipo was released )  this coin went up and stay,s stable up ( meaning dev did not dump his self bought coins )

so every one see,s this coin make profit and is hopping in also ( making the price go up more ) Smiley especialy sins this was a ipo that was  not dumped to shit by a dev buying his own coins Tongue


Really happy I bought during the ICO at .00033333, especially considering it was even up to 100,000 sats this morning! This is the first ICO in a long time, if EVER that hasn't dropped below ICO price in the first 24hours and STILL has not! This one will be going far Cheesy
Perfosco
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 06:56:34 PM
 #250


thanks for sharing this earlier in the thread too GucciCoign. glad that we've got a dev who isn't afraid and going to run like others
kryptologist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


@kryptographer


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 06:59:01 PM
 #251

Hello everyone,

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers

Been seeing you guys around lately. I love your site. Following Smiley


Finally an organization that isn't trying to hide things from us. Going to be watching you guys. Thanks for your service to the community


+100000000000000000000000. Support this 100%. Alt.Report is best.

Paying cryptoasian to keep your identity private is garbage.
CrownCannabis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 07:01:59 PM
 #252

ICO price was 0.00033333 and price is currently 0.00092786 was just 0.00100000 sats per coin.

0.00092786 / 0.00033333 = 2.7836 times the original ICO price.

The math isn't that difficult bro.

What are you talking about, the price didn't double. It only moved up about 35%.
par
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 07:04:59 PM
 #253

https://i.imgur.com/Hxz9uaE.png

https://i.imgur.com/Dwo4F1r.png

https://i.imgur.com/71nXgSN.png

Anonymous, decentralized voting on the blockchain makes it easy for the community to form a consensus on important issues regarding the future of GSX. Secure, transparent, tamper-proof, and viewable 24 hours a day. GSX is the only coin that brings together its community with voting on the blockchain. Predefined rules govern and enforce the voting process, putting the coin in the hands of the holders. Internet of Things in the context of a blockchain implies decentralization, rather than connecting devices to a closed source, centralized infrastructure.

Voting in a real world scenario is flawed to the core. Decentralizing it, making it trustless and transparent on the blockchain, fixes those fundamental flaws. Human nature is the weakest link, so we remove it from the equation. Then we take that innovation of voting on the blockchain and actually use it ourselves to further the very project that created it. Vote fraud and lack of transparency is rampant everywhere: business, internet, politics, you name it. I see Glowshares voting as a proof of concept. Our use of it is fairly mundane compared to the possibilities, but that will change once we prove it works.

Quote
The Lean Startup methodology has as a premise that every startup is a grand experiment that attempts to answer a question. The question is not "Can this product be built?" Instead, the questions are "Should this product be built?" and "Can we build a sustainable business around this set of products and services?" This experiment is more than just theoretical inquiry; it is a first product. If it is successful, it allows a manager to get started with his or her campaign: enlisting early adopters, adding employees to each further experiment or iteration, and eventually starting to build a product. By the time that product is ready to be distributed widely, it will already have established customers. It will have solved real problems and offer detailed specifications for what needs to be built.

A core component of Lean Startup methodology is the build-measure-learn feedback loop. The first step is figuring out the problem that needs to be solved and then developing a minimum viable product (MVP) to begin the process of learning as quickly as possible. Once the MVP is established, a startup can work on tuning the engine. This will involve measurement and learning and must include actionable metrics that can demonstrate cause and effect question.

https://i.imgur.com/6Oz51ma.png

https://i.imgur.com/AJhHWWI.png

Proof of Stake
Block Time: 1 Minute
Interest Rate: 7% annually
Minimum Coin Age: 8 hours
Block Maturity: 50 blocks


https://i.imgur.com/sftkzia.png

Website: http://www.glowshares.com
Block Explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/gsx/
IRC: https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/#glowshares
Market Cap: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/glowshares/
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/glowshares
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GlowShares
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GlowShares
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/GlowShares-GSX-OFFICIAL-GROUP-8201407
Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/117057632413908213726/117057632413908213726/
Sina Weibo: http://www.weibo.com/u/5363745911
Vkontakte: https://vk.com/glowshares
Cryptrader: https://cryptrader.com/charts/bittrex/gsx/btc
Cryptonator: https://www.cryptonator.com/rates/#GSX


https://i.imgur.com/zAxVkNF.png

Windows: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-win-v1.0.0.0.zip
OSX: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-osx-v1.0.0.0.dmg
Linux 32-bit: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-linux32-v1.0.0.0.zip
Linux 64-bit: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-linux64-v1.0.0.0.zip
Source code: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares


https://i.imgur.com/3dSu3Rg.png

Bittrex: https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-GSX



https://i.imgur.com/UC5T9gM.png

https://i.imgur.com/wFvRxoM.png

I'm in.
glowshares (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 07:09:46 PM
 #254



thanks for sharing this earlier in the thread too GucciCoign. glad that we've got a dev who isn't afraid and going to run like others

I hope it's clear by now that I'm not going anywhere, but I still stand by this!

AltEyes
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 07:10:28 PM
 #255


I RETWEETED FOR Gr$$N VOTING IMAGE ON TWITTER

Did you guys vote by retweeting on twitter yet?
GrinderWish
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 07:14:41 PM
 #256

https://i.imgur.com/Hxz9uaE.png

https://i.imgur.com/Dwo4F1r.png

https://i.imgur.com/71nXgSN.png

Anonymous, decentralized voting on the blockchain makes it easy for the community to form a consensus on important issues regarding the future of GSX. Secure, transparent, tamper-proof, and viewable 24 hours a day. GSX is the only coin that brings together its community with voting on the blockchain. Predefined rules govern and enforce the voting process, putting the coin in the hands of the holders. Internet of Things in the context of a blockchain implies decentralization, rather than connecting devices to a closed source, centralized infrastructure.

Voting in a real world scenario is flawed to the core. Decentralizing it, making it trustless and transparent on the blockchain, fixes those fundamental flaws. Human nature is the weakest link, so we remove it from the equation. Then we take that innovation of voting on the blockchain and actually use it ourselves to further the very project that created it. Vote fraud and lack of transparency is rampant everywhere: business, internet, politics, you name it. I see Glowshares voting as a proof of concept. Our use of it is fairly mundane compared to the possibilities, but that will change once we prove it works.

Quote
The Lean Startup methodology has as a premise that every startup is a grand experiment that attempts to answer a question. The question is not "Can this product be built?" Instead, the questions are "Should this product be built?" and "Can we build a sustainable business around this set of products and services?" This experiment is more than just theoretical inquiry; it is a first product. If it is successful, it allows a manager to get started with his or her campaign: enlisting early adopters, adding employees to each further experiment or iteration, and eventually starting to build a product. By the time that product is ready to be distributed widely, it will already have established customers. It will have solved real problems and offer detailed specifications for what needs to be built.

A core component of Lean Startup methodology is the build-measure-learn feedback loop. The first step is figuring out the problem that needs to be solved and then developing a minimum viable product (MVP) to begin the process of learning as quickly as possible. Once the MVP is established, a startup can work on tuning the engine. This will involve measurement and learning and must include actionable metrics that can demonstrate cause and effect question.

https://i.imgur.com/6Oz51ma.png

https://i.imgur.com/AJhHWWI.png

Proof of Stake
Block Time: 1 Minute
Interest Rate: 7% annually
Minimum Coin Age: 8 hours
Block Maturity: 50 blocks


https://i.imgur.com/sftkzia.png

Website: http://www.glowshares.com
Block Explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/gsx/
IRC: https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/#glowshares
Market Cap: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/glowshares/
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/glowshares
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GlowShares
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GlowShares
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/GlowShares-GSX-OFFICIAL-GROUP-8201407
Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/117057632413908213726/117057632413908213726/
Sina Weibo: http://www.weibo.com/u/5363745911
Vkontakte: https://vk.com/glowshares
Cryptrader: https://cryptrader.com/charts/bittrex/gsx/btc
Cryptonator: https://www.cryptonator.com/rates/#GSX


https://i.imgur.com/zAxVkNF.png

Windows: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-win-v1.0.0.0.zip
OSX: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-osx-v1.0.0.0.dmg
Linux 32-bit: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-linux32-v1.0.0.0.zip
Linux 64-bit: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-linux64-v1.0.0.0.zip
Source code: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares


https://i.imgur.com/3dSu3Rg.png

Bittrex: https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-GSX



https://i.imgur.com/UC5T9gM.png

https://i.imgur.com/wFvRxoM.png

I'm in.

Haha me too! Did you see these on twitter?

whisper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 267
Merit: 250


Learn to go against your mind


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 07:16:57 PM
 #257

Hello everyone,

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers

Are you make this verification for free? Can we see a Bitcoin verification too? Your ID and details of your self too? Im so curious realy...
Perfosco
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 07:17:30 PM
 #258

https://i.imgur.com/Hxz9uaE.png

https://i.imgur.com/Dwo4F1r.png

https://i.imgur.com/71nXgSN.png

Anonymous, decentralized voting on the blockchain makes it easy for the community to form a consensus on important issues regarding the future of GSX. Secure, transparent, tamper-proof, and viewable 24 hours a day. GSX is the only coin that brings together its community with voting on the blockchain. Predefined rules govern and enforce the voting process, putting the coin in the hands of the holders. Internet of Things in the context of a blockchain implies decentralization, rather than connecting devices to a closed source, centralized infrastructure.

Voting in a real world scenario is flawed to the core. Decentralizing it, making it trustless and transparent on the blockchain, fixes those fundamental flaws. Human nature is the weakest link, so we remove it from the equation. Then we take that innovation of voting on the blockchain and actually use it ourselves to further the very project that created it. Vote fraud and lack of transparency is rampant everywhere: business, internet, politics, you name it. I see Glowshares voting as a proof of concept. Our use of it is fairly mundane compared to the possibilities, but that will change once we prove it works.

Quote
The Lean Startup methodology has as a premise that every startup is a grand experiment that attempts to answer a question. The question is not "Can this product be built?" Instead, the questions are "Should this product be built?" and "Can we build a sustainable business around this set of products and services?" This experiment is more than just theoretical inquiry; it is a first product. If it is successful, it allows a manager to get started with his or her campaign: enlisting early adopters, adding employees to each further experiment or iteration, and eventually starting to build a product. By the time that product is ready to be distributed widely, it will already have established customers. It will have solved real problems and offer detailed specifications for what needs to be built.

A core component of Lean Startup methodology is the build-measure-learn feedback loop. The first step is figuring out the problem that needs to be solved and then developing a minimum viable product (MVP) to begin the process of learning as quickly as possible. Once the MVP is established, a startup can work on tuning the engine. This will involve measurement and learning and must include actionable metrics that can demonstrate cause and effect question.

https://i.imgur.com/6Oz51ma.png

https://i.imgur.com/AJhHWWI.png

Proof of Stake
Block Time: 1 Minute
Interest Rate: 7% annually
Minimum Coin Age: 8 hours
Block Maturity: 50 blocks


https://i.imgur.com/sftkzia.png

Website: http://www.glowshares.com
Block Explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/gsx/
IRC: https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/#glowshares
Market Cap: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/glowshares/
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/glowshares
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GlowShares
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GlowShares
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/GlowShares-GSX-OFFICIAL-GROUP-8201407
Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/117057632413908213726/117057632413908213726/
Sina Weibo: http://www.weibo.com/u/5363745911
Vkontakte: https://vk.com/glowshares
Cryptrader: https://cryptrader.com/charts/bittrex/gsx/btc
Cryptonator: https://www.cryptonator.com/rates/#GSX


https://i.imgur.com/zAxVkNF.png

Windows: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-win-v1.0.0.0.zip
OSX: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-osx-v1.0.0.0.dmg
Linux 32-bit: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-linux32-v1.0.0.0.zip
Linux 64-bit: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/glowshares-linux64-v1.0.0.0.zip
Source code: https://github.com/GlowShares/glowshares


https://i.imgur.com/3dSu3Rg.png

Bittrex: https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-GSX



https://i.imgur.com/UC5T9gM.png

https://i.imgur.com/wFvRxoM.png

I'm in.

Haha me too! Did you see these on twitter?


I retweeted the Green picture too. I think it goes with the GSX theme better.
Alt.Report
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 07:23:24 PM
 #259

Hello everyone,

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers

Are you make this verification for free? Can we see a Bitcoin verification too? Your ID and details of your self too? Im so curious realy...

Hi,

Yes we do this verification for free. We are helping people DYOR. Users are able to easily and quickly see if a developer is anonymous to the public or not. In this case the GlowShares developer is anonymous.

We can do one for BTC too (however the site is really all about altcoins). I will message you when its ready.

Cheers,

p.s. thanks to everyone that is supporting our growing cause and your kind words
SecretsOfCrypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 466
Merit: 250


Twitter Follow for no BS crypto: @SecretsOfCrypto


View Profile WWW
November 25, 2014, 07:46:27 PM
 #260

Hello everyone,

We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.

Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".

That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:

http://alt.report/developer-verification

Cheers

Are you make this verification for free? Can we see a Bitcoin verification too? Your ID and details of your self too? Im so curious realy...

Hi,

Yes we do this verification for free. We are helping people DYOR. Users are able to easily and quickly see if a developer is anonymous to the public or not. In this case the GlowShares developer is anonymous.

We can do one for BTC too (however the site is really all about altcoins). I will message you when its ready.

Cheers,

p.s. thanks to everyone that is supporting our growing cause and your kind words

First step forward in crypto for a long time
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!