jl2012
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1092
|
 |
April 02, 2013, 09:37:41 AM |
|
true, and their volumes are also ridiculously low, in all currencies ...
 what ? by volume are the second atm third in $ volume in your screen-shot it looks to me ... I am surprised, didn't expect that after seeing their order-book especially in euros, whom to sell to/buy from? edit: just saw their "reserves": "Reserves: BitInstant: 443 USD AurumXchange: 7069 USD" hm, I would rather not publish that numbers ... That just mean BitInstant and AurumXchange are running out of USD on BTC-E. |
Donation address: 374iXxS4BuqFHsEwwxUuH3nvJ69Y7Hqur3 (Bitcoin ONLY)
LRDGENPLYrcTRssGoZrsCT1hngaH3BVkM4 (LTC)
PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
StarenseN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1362
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:06:50 AM |
|
Indeed Btc-e is a cow milk  Stop beeing haters if you don't have the balls to get your money on it  cheers! |
|
|
|
|
Jaques
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:16:36 AM |
|
Indeed Btc-e is a cow milk Stop beeing haters if you don't have the balls to get your money on it cheers! no hate here at all ... (as I don't like to waste my energy)but yes, cheap coins over there ... |
|
|
|
|
NamelessOne
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:33:29 AM |
|
It begins! 106.50!
|
|
|
|
|
NamelessOne
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:37:28 AM |
|
107! Am I the only one up? lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Newscastix
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:38:48 AM |
|
107! Am I the only one up? lol nope... watching.... 107.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:39:41 AM |
|
|
Bitcoin will show the world what hard money really is.
|
|
|
|
deeplink
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:53:28 AM |
|
Does anyone believe this Mtgox is going to support LTC rumor which caused the LTC spike?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ehoffman
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:56:52 AM |
|
Does anyone believe this Mtgox is going to support LTC rumor which caused the LTC spike?
From BTC-e, a link to Mt. Gox ticker API... https://data.mtgox.com/api/2/LTCUSD/money/ticker |
Like my comments? Cheer me up at 137s1qFV63M6SXWhKkwjaZKEeZX23pq1hw Don't like my comments, donate to the BCRT (better comment research team) here at 1A1PbZypjEe7yanj69ApVS1FhK8UMW7Wdc |
|
|
lebing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
|
|
April 02, 2013, 10:59:47 AM |
|
suicidal bear strikes again.  |
Bro, do you even blockchain?
-E Voorhees
|
|
|
NamelessOne
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:01:18 AM |
|
suicidal bear strikes again. Oh yeah, this bear is trying hard. |
|
|
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:03:13 AM |
|
Does anyone believe this Mtgox is going to support LTC rumor which caused the LTC spike?
I don't know. But if it's true, I think Mark Karpeles should leave the Bitcoin foundation board. |
|
|
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:09:21 AM |
|
Does anyone believe this Mtgox is going to support LTC rumor which caused the LTC spike?
I don't know. But if it's true, I think Mark Karpeles should leave the Bitcoin foundation board. Lol. Supporting usd is fine. Ltc is not. Why you hate crypro? I want the board members to focus 100% on Bitcoin. It's a Bitcoin foundation, not a cryptocurrency foundation. |
|
|
|
|
|
ehoffman
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:18:40 AM |
|
Does anyone believe this Mtgox is going to support LTC rumor which caused the LTC spike?
I don't know. But if it's true, I think Mark Karpeles should leave the Bitcoin foundation board. Lol. Supporting usd is fine. Ltc is not. Why you hate crypro? I want the board members to focus 100% on Bitcoin. It's a Bitcoin foundation, not a cryptocurrency foundation. I approve |
Like my comments? Cheer me up at 137s1qFV63M6SXWhKkwjaZKEeZX23pq1hw Don't like my comments, donate to the BCRT (better comment research team) here at 1A1PbZypjEe7yanj69ApVS1FhK8UMW7Wdc |
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:23:16 AM
Last edit: April 02, 2013, 11:38:03 AM by Kupsi |
|
Does anyone believe this Mtgox is going to support LTC rumor which caused the LTC spike?
I don't know. But if it's true, I think Mark Karpeles should leave the Bitcoin foundation board. Lol. Supporting usd is fine. Ltc is not. Why you hate crypro? I want the board members to focus 100% on Bitcoin. It's a Bitcoin foundation, not a cryptocurrency foundation. You are anti gox using anything other than btc, even fiat? You know gox is an exchange and not a person right? Gox can exchange every cryptocurrency they want. I have no problem with that. But I don't want any of the board members of Bitcoin foundation to support/promote other cryptocurrencies. |
|
|
|
|
samson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1068
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:24:29 AM |
|
Does anyone believe this Mtgox is going to support LTC rumor which caused the LTC spike?
I don't know. But if it's true, I think Mark Karpeles should leave the Bitcoin foundation board. Lol. Supporting usd is fine. Ltc is not. Why you hate crypro? Personally I don't see why MtGox don't sell all the Crypto Currencies which have been around for any length of time. It would bring a lot more customers in for them and create liquidity in the smaller alts. |
|
|
|
|
Zangelbert Bingledack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:31:56 AM |
|
Litecoin is not a threat to Bitcoin. In fact it makes it more useful because speculators can hedge into litecoins whenever they think the BTC price is bubbly, and do this without dealing with fiat or fiat regulations. It's also a better tumbler than S.DICE because transferring between them "air-gaps" the two blockchains. And of course it's a backup and second "testnet" with many similar characteristics. These three aspects make Bitcoin far more valuable, so Litecoin or at least one non-Bitcoin cryptocurrency will always thrive.
The fear is that this will inflate the money supply, but it won't (at least not more than 2x, which takes us back to only last month in market cap), because there is no such value for a third cryptocurrency, unless it adds really useful functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DougTanner
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:41:51 AM |
|
This week is going to be batshit insane, practically no walls, massive media attention  Although, I'm starting to get worried the lack of asks will cause a one-day gain of > 50% value and trigger a huge sell-off like in 2011 when people peg that as the peak. Was anyone here following the walls as closely as we are now? What did the ask/bid charts look like during that fateful day?  |
|
|
|
Zangelbert Bingledack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:44:18 AM |
|
That said, the price of Litecoins is outrageous right now. Since there are 84 million LTC to be mined in total, that is like a BTC price of $8, which is a twelfth of what Bitcoin is at now. There is no freakin' way Litecoin is a twelfth as valuable as Bitcoin, by any measure at all. However, since they are about the same the price could equilibriate to something like one-fifth of the BTC price if nothing goes wrong, though that seems ridiculously optimistic.
In any case, any gain in Litecoin is a gain for Bitcoin as well. If it continues with its present function, it will probably be as big as it needs to be to provide an adequate hedge for BTC price. A third redundant coin won't join, because the hedging, tumbling, and testnet/backup functions it could provide would be minimal at the margin.
|
|
|
|
|
samson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1068
|
|
April 02, 2013, 11:45:24 AM |
|
This week is going to be batshit insane, practically no walls, massive media attention Although, I'm starting to get worried the lack of asks will cause a one-day gain of > 50% value and trigger a huge sell-off like in 2011 when people peg that as the peak. Was anyone here following the walls as closely as we are now? What did the ask/bid charts look like during that fateful day? No asks / very low asks is a very bad warning sign for me. It suggests a peak of speculative greed. So the price is purely based on speculation and nothing else. This will end well  |
|
|
|
|
|
