|
dyask
|
 |
April 18, 2015, 12:37:01 PM |
|
Never should've said Bitcoin wasn't viable and I wouldn't be here, he declared war then cries, it's his emotional manipulation he uses on everyone
That isn't an excuse for publishing smut. aren't you that other scam guy? Funny coming from someone that uses a picture of a troll. It's meant to be ironic  Previous question still stands. You question is nonsense. I have no idea what you are talking about and probably no one else does. I was a GAW customer. That is the extent of my involvement. This thread has shown the true ugly nature of the people here, tearing into stuff they have no business even looking at. If you find a bag of money that a bank robber drops, does that mean that money is yours? Someone released a lot of information they had no right to release. This is the type of information that should only be acquired with court orders. It would then be reviewed by attorneys to separate release only the evidence needed for a court case. Digging through it by the posters here is morally wrong and corrupt. The collateral damage here is extreme. What has been done here is horrible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
strangerdanger101
|
|
April 18, 2015, 12:46:02 PM |
|
Never should've said Bitcoin wasn't viable and I wouldn't be here, he declared war then cries, it's his emotional manipulation he uses on everyone
That isn't an excuse for publishing smut. aren't you that other scam guy? Funny coming from someone that uses a picture of a troll. It's meant to be ironic Previous question still stands. You question is nonsense. I have no idea what you are talking about and probably no one else does. I was a GAW customer. That is the extent of my involvement. This thread has shown the true ugly nature of the people here, tearing into stuff they have no business even looking at. If you find a bag of money that a bank robber drops, does that mean that money is yours? Someone released a lot of information they had no right to release. This is the type of information that should only be acquired with court orders. It would then be reviewed by attorneys to separate release only the evidence needed for a court case. Digging through it by the posters here is morally wrong and corrupt. The collateral damage here is extreme. What has been done here is horrible. Hands up its the morality police! My apologies I thought you were part of that scrypt.cc racket. |
What has it got in its pocketses precious? BTC: 1KctJNLwzFK8qJPsSwDrQRNxxKnVCrZm93
|
|
|
|
KeyserSoze
|
|
April 18, 2015, 12:46:07 PM |
|
Wow. You gotta be some kinda Grade A nincompoop bent on destruction to ignore your lawyer when he's that nervous. |
I used to day trade Bitcoin successfully. Then I took an arrow to the knee.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
April 18, 2015, 12:48:21 PM |
|
You question is nonsense. I have no idea what you are talking about and probably no one else does. I was a GAW customer. That is the extent of my involvement.
This thread has shown the true ugly nature of the people here, tearing into stuff they have no business even looking at. If you find a bag of money that a bank robber drops, does that mean that money is yours? Someone released a lot of information they had no right to release. This is the type of information that should only be acquired with court orders. It would then be reviewed by attorneys to separate release only the evidence needed for a court case.
Digging through it by the posters here is morally wrong and corrupt. The collateral damage here is extreme. What has been done here is horrible.
Get off your moral high horse and quit your bitching. The only person you have the right to bitch at is the guy who released the emails to the public. Nobody else is breaking any laws by reading the publicly available info and discovering the plethora of fraud within. |
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
April 18, 2015, 12:49:28 PM |
|
Never should've said Bitcoin wasn't viable and I wouldn't be here, he declared war then cries, it's his emotional manipulation he uses on everyone
That isn't an excuse for publishing smut. aren't you that other scam guy? Funny coming from someone that uses a picture of a troll. It's meant to be ironic Previous question still stands. You question is nonsense. I have no idea what you are talking about and probably no one else does. I was a GAW customer. That is the extent of my involvement. This thread has shown the true ugly nature of the people here, tearing into stuff they have no business even looking at. If you find a bag of money that a bank robber drops, does that mean that money is yours? Someone released a lot of information they had no right to release. This is the type of information that should only be acquired with court orders. It would then be reviewed by attorneys to separate release only the evidence needed for a court case. Digging through it by the posters here is morally wrong and corrupt. The collateral damage here is extreme. What has been done here is horrible. Dry off your panties |
|
|
|
Buckeye2015
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
April 18, 2015, 12:49:59 PM |
|
Wow. You gotta be some kinda Grade A nincompoop bent on destruction to ignore your lawyer when he's that nervous. He's not a lawyer, he's a business strategy consultant, which means he has no excuse for NOT going to the SEC and Homeland Security with this issue... I hope he's found at least partially responsible/liable for this whole scam, but I'm sure he's going to sing like a canary and get off. |
PayCON: PHQAtLmwRXTskGqry1FBuFLnWuqMzcj1TH --==*==-- Qora: QcgdKgPD1SkqzGXWGAY1gwao7257gyGVnB --==*==-- BitCoin: 1L9NLA3wHcGwffm2avVg3tzhDGjtq9
|
|
|
Phildo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 18, 2015, 12:51:38 PM |
|
Never should've said Bitcoin wasn't viable and I wouldn't be here, he declared war then cries, it's his emotional manipulation he uses on everyone
That isn't an excuse for publishing smut. aren't you that other scam guy? Funny coming from someone that uses a picture of a troll. It's meant to be ironic Previous question still stands. You question is nonsense. I have no idea what you are talking about and probably no one else does. I was a GAW customer. That is the extent of my involvement. This thread has shown the true ugly nature of the people here, tearing into stuff they have no business even looking at. If you find a bag of money that a bank robber drops, does that mean that money is yours? Someone released a lot of information they had no right to release. This is the type of information that should only be acquired with court orders. It would then be reviewed by attorneys to separate release only the evidence needed for a court case. Digging through it by the posters here is morally wrong and corrupt. The collateral damage here is extreme. What has been done here is horrible. How exactly is reading about and discussing fraud more morally wrong and corrupt than committing the fraud? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
April 18, 2015, 12:59:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye2015
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:04:58 PM |
|
Okay... I bet that actually does happen... once I quit laughing, gonna have to run out and get more brain bleach. |
PayCON: PHQAtLmwRXTskGqry1FBuFLnWuqMzcj1TH --==*==-- Qora: QcgdKgPD1SkqzGXWGAY1gwao7257gyGVnB --==*==-- BitCoin: 1L9NLA3wHcGwffm2avVg3tzhDGjtq9
|
|
|
Franz_Huber
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:17:33 PM |
|
If you find a bag of money that a bank robber drops, does that mean that money is yours?
Money and leaked information are different things. |
|
|
|
GAW_Homero
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:19:44 PM |
|
Expert Doubts Sony Legal Team Can Prevent Publishing Of Leaked Emails
A forensic investigator says he doubts a high powered legal team will be able to stop news outlets from publishing embarrassing Sony emails which have been leaked by unknown hackers.
Governors State Professor William Kresse says auctioning off, say stolen office equipment, is different from publishing a stolen e-mail which is protected by the First Amendment.
“The email itself might be stolen, but it’s the content of the email, the information of the email, which generally gets some protection under the First Amendment,” he said.
Kresse says attorneys can ask or threaten, but he doubts they can stop publication of the internal emails. He says prior censorship efforts are not uncommon and are rarely successful.
Professor Kresse teaches, accounting, business and fraud prevention at Governor’s State University.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeyserSoze
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:20:30 PM |
|
Wild assumptions don't help. Let's stay focused on exposing the fraud.
How about: you stay focused on what Franz wants to focus on, and leave me to decide what I want to focus on. Other than that, please take a long walk off a short pier. |
I used to day trade Bitcoin successfully. Then I took an arrow to the knee.
|
|
|
|
KeyserSoze
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:24:34 PM |
|
I was a GAW customer.
I thought I smelled sheep. Are you saving money to buy metal from WhoCares? It is the next big thing. |
I used to day trade Bitcoin successfully. Then I took an arrow to the knee.
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:25:19 PM |
|
Thou shall not lie with another man, in a tesla, with Homero and stu
|
|
|
|
|
KeyserSoze
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:27:24 PM |
|
Wow. You gotta be some kinda Grade A nincompoop bent on destruction to ignore your lawyer when he's that nervous.
He's not a lawyer, he's a business strategy consultant, which means he has no excuse for NOT going to the SEC and Homeland Security with this issue... I hope he's found at least partially responsible/liable for this whole scam, but I'm sure he's going to sing like a canary and get off. Thanks. I thought he was another lawyer. I'm having trouble keeping up with the large cast of characters! |
I used to day trade Bitcoin successfully. Then I took an arrow to the knee.
|
|
|
|
KeyserSoze
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:29:31 PM |
|
How exactly is reading about and discussing fraud more morally wrong and corrupt than committing the fraud?
Because with religious types, everything everyone else does is wrong. One should only live by his code of ethics, likely learned from a book chock full of condoned murder, rape and slavery. It doesn't need to actually make sense. |
I used to day trade Bitcoin successfully. Then I took an arrow to the knee.
|
|
|
|
rawbot
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:29:56 PM |
|
Even if I would want to help PayCoin directly, for the most part I can't/won't because of moral reasons and for me it's much better to work on PayCon. They asked me if I wanted to help them with the original roadmap, I asked them if they wanted to outlay some of the ideas on PayCon instead.
Wasn't suggesting collaboration, just giving a technical hand following request as you already did. Fuck off you desperate dipshit. |
|
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:32:18 PM |
|
My apologies I thought you were part of that scrypt.cc racket.
I've been a scrypt.cc customer since Feb 08, 2014. If that bugs you, then just know I don't try to collect referrals and just try to stick to the facts. I do post in the scrypt.cc thread. However, I'm not going to try to push someone into investing there. I fail to see the connection between scrypt.cc and GAW. |
|
|
|
|
Crestington
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
|
|
April 18, 2015, 01:34:19 PM |
|
Even if I would want to help PayCoin directly, for the most part I can't/won't because of moral reasons and for me it's much better to work on PayCon. They asked me if I wanted to help them with the original roadmap, I asked them if they wanted to outlay some of the ideas on PayCon instead.
Wasn't suggesting collaboration, just giving a technical hand following request as you already did. Fuck off you desperate dipshit. Who? what? where? why? What are you referring to? |
|
|
|
|
|
