GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[bitpop]

Hey Seth, I don't care where you lose your money. Go to bed cupping Homero.

[1713892904]

1713892904

[1713892904]

1713892904

[1713892904]

1713892904

[1713892904]

1713892904

[RoomBot]

The only guy I'd give bitcoin to is seriousinvest

SeriousInvest can "Make XPY Great Again!"

Only with great effort and some red baseball caps with that motto on them!!!

WAHAHAHAHA

[owlcatz]

The only guy I'd give bitcoin to is seriousinvest

SeriousInvest can "Make XPY Great Again!"

Only with great effort and some red baseball caps with that motto on them!!!

WAHAHAHAHA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3z841UJiVk   

[RoomBot]

So tl;dr, what's the connection between XPY and ION and/or Garza (if any)?

Gawtards who lost money or were part of the paycorn scam are doing it all over again to the same gawtards

Nailed It

[RoomBot]

Gawtards should take this deal https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361778.0

Right!!!
Dealing with a SNAKE is way better than GAW Miners!!!!!

ahahahahahahaha

[owlcatz]

Who says I'm new ?

Hey Seth, so how's your shitty toilet cleaning life treating you nowadays? Did you turn into a paycoin scammer too?

[RoomBot]

All valid point but you don't use BTC in this platform because it does not handle micropayments efficiently, as far as Garza goes I don't think he'll be free much longer.

And ION - which doesn't even exist yet - handles micropayments better? How exactly? And why is that even an issue if the whole "platform" is a website and doesn't appear to be relying on the blockchain that much. Might as well use an existing established coin but that wouldn't let them do a lucrative ICO, that's what this is all about.

Even their own press release says this about wallets:

"Many of our users can be intimidated by a QT wallet, and most prefer the simplicity of an online wallet," Richard Nelson, ionomy Support Director said, "so we made it easy for them to use the online wallet, but also get the benefits of the PoS system, including masternodes."

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ionomy-gaming-platform-seeks-entice-172602645.html

By the way "the platform" (i.e. PNGs) launched today and the QT wallet is still not available.

I myself with give them respect for fighting through the rumors and scam accusations and continuing to attempt something...we are such a small community in crypto and all we do is rip each other apart.

Do yourself a favor and conduct some research on how this animosity started. Hint: it wasn't an attempt to rip something legit apart. All your posturing is bizarrely reminiscent of Garza, down to exact verbiage (FUD, trolling). Wake the fuck up. It's 2016.

Yeah! Prince Garza gonna party like it's 1999

RIP Prince

[owlcatz]

All valid point but you don't use BTC in this platform because it does not handle micropayments efficiently, as far as Garza goes I don't think he'll be free much longer.

And ION - which doesn't even exist yet - handles micropayments better? How exactly? And why is that even an issue if the whole "platform" is a website and doesn't appear to be relying on the blockchain that much. Might as well use an existing established coin but that wouldn't let them do a lucrative ICO, that's what this is all about.

Even their own press release says this about wallets:

"Many of our users can be intimidated by a QT wallet, and most prefer the simplicity of an online wallet," Richard Nelson, ionomy Support Director said, "so we made it easy for them to use the online wallet, but also get the benefits of the PoS system, including masternodes."

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ionomy-gaming-platform-seeks-entice-172602645.html

By the way "the platform" (i.e. PNGs) launched today and the QT wallet is still not available.

I myself with give them respect for fighting through the rumors and scam accusations and continuing to attempt something...we are such a small community in crypto and all we do is rip each other apart.

Do yourself a favor and conduct some research on how this animosity started. Hint: it wasn't an attempt to rip something legit apart. All your posturing is bizarrely reminiscent of Garza, down to exact verbiage (FUD, trolling). Wake the fuck up. It's 2016.

Yeah! FU! Prince Garza gonna party like it's 1999

RIP Prince

STFU Garzoids

Careful, a lot of peoples' sarcasm detectors may be malfunctioning!

[RoomBot]

HEH!   Let the Good Times Roll @OwlCatz!

Garbanzo countdown:  T minus one week yo   

[o0o0]

All valid point but you don't use BTC in this platform because it does not handle micropayments efficiently, as far as Garza goes I don't think he'll be free much longer.

As far as the haslet business goes that was again, Garza...

A lot of fake documentation was used to burn a lot of peoples names but we are all entitled to our own opinions and it's very tough to trust anyone in crypto these days..im just trying to play the devil's advocate here and asking you all to use some logic.

Just the mere fact that XPY staked on contribution was a huge issue, because it allows a stake of the wallet is turned off and back on. Ion on the other hand will stake solely on connectivity..you need to stay connected to hit the probability of a stake within it's PoS 3.0.

Also as far as the hundreds of pages you claim to be warnings..it's actually a whole lot of bullshit that has no substance...a lot of fud and trolling.

We need to do our due diligence and really be careful in the crypto space but the truth will set ION free, just stay tuned.

You must be one fucking idiot. Bitcoin isn't viable or efficient or whatever you need to scam. Fucking clown.

Your stupid games are from codecanyon or upwork. You're worthless, is scamming the only business you can run?

My money is on them not showing the complete premine address. Because... drum roll

On launch they will
- Split the premine into as many masternodes as they can to ensure they have the max % returns from master node 50/50. They'll disguise this by saying by us setting up masternodes it starts a stable network. They'll say all earning ion in masternodes will be burned but you'll never see it burned because you won't have the address.

- push for the likes of a member not known e.g. adam matlack won't make the request but unknowns on the team will do it to poloniex and bittrex. God help them if this succeeds although i doubt it because the google searches will returns relevance. I believe now that the reason behind staying behind the ionomy handle and not detailing who it is is for this purpose.

- the stakers people have will lock the ion for what is it 2-3 months? that gives them time to milk off the masternode reward ion into these bittrex and poloniex markets if they occur. There will be minimal competition as funds will be held in stakers locked. What competition they do get will be beaten by the coins they have in masternode rewards.

- if a major exchange isn't achieved they will attempt yobit etc and try to mark it as an exclusive or spin some way and work to get their users into buying it there.

The above is a possible scenario to their continued reason to stay anonymous. I'd remember this above and wait in time.

[skinnyboy]

So here we are, days after they came here to beg people to send them $1000000 and we still don't know:

Where the premine is held
Where the ICO funds are held
What the company details are
Who the owners of the (probably still non existent) company are
Who the resident in Singapore is
Who uses the ionomy handle
Anything about the actual code underpinning this wonderful new coin
How they're going to get around the Apple TOS
If there are any games ready for launch


What we do know:

Paycoin community members have come here getting very angry and claiming we're all trolls
A rebranded paycoin.io website has been launched (though still no QT wallet)


On balance it's not looking too hot for them right now.

[kken01]

the devs said this is not going to work as transparent non-profit. you can see next quarter results of the company.... if there is one 
anyways thats enough time to milk the money and burn everything down garza style

also reason for no escrow is that they cant trust anyone

 

[skinnyboy]

the devs said this is not going to work as transparent non-profit. you can see next quarter results of the company.... if there is one 
anyways thats enough time to milk the money and burn everything down garza style

also reason for no escrow is that they cant trust anyone

 

They've actually said that?

[kken01]

basicly yes. heres some quotes i saved













rocket ready to go!




ps:
jason is the same jason sponaugle who maintained and worked on the online wallet that was hacked at least twice. you can see his insanely stupid posts in the bitlend thread which he also works on with richard nelson the ionomy support director and allen the GAW lawsuit information gatherer... and joe mordica

[bumpershot]

Talk about a complete marketing failure. No, they don't have to show transparency. Also, people don't have to buy their coin. If they're above board, they lose very little in terms of man hours in exchange for a bunch of people feeling much more comfortable buying into this. They choose to be secretive for what reason? Because transparency is annoying? How much money do they think this ICO will make with such little information given to potential purchasers.

I don't think they're going to get a very good return on their time investment here.

[Phildo]

Talk about a complete marketing failure. No, they don't have to show transparency. Also, people don't have to buy their coin. If they're above board, they lose very little in terms of man hours in exchange for a bunch of people feeling much more comfortable buying into this. They choose to be secretive for what reason? Because transparency is annoying? How much money do they think this ICO will make with such little information given to potential purchasers.

I don't think they're going to get a very good return on their time investment here.

It's like the spelling and grammar errors in the email from a Nigerian Prince. If you are smart enough to find them, you aren't dumb enough to lose your money. The people asking those questions aren't dumb enough to give their money to these clowns, so they will ignore them because there is nothing in it for them. The people that buy their "witch hunt" accusations are their marks, so they will play it up and reel them in.

[mutha]

Talk about a complete marketing failure. No, they don't have to show transparency. Also, people don't have to buy their coin. If they're above board, they lose very little in terms of man hours in exchange for a bunch of people feeling much more comfortable buying into this. They choose to be secretive for what reason? Because transparency is annoying? How much money do they think this ICO will make with such little information given to potential purchasers.

I don't think they're going to get a very good return on their time investment here.

Oh and not to mention how much time "management" dedicates to posting on various forums.

Most managers I know do not have time to post hype and non sense to the lemmings 24/7. But rather too busy dev'ing building or designing whatever it is they specialize in.

That is a major tell in what is going on. Garza Modus Operandi v.03.1.

*shrugs* Oh well stupid people shouldnt have money in the first place so let them buy some manufactured  hype  

and that concludes this FUD session!

[simdude]

basicly yes. heres some quotes i saved













rocket ready to go!




ps:
jason is the same jason sponaugle who maintained and worked on the online wallet that was hacked at least twice. you can see his insanely stupid posts in the bitlend thread which he also works on with richard nelson the ionomy support director and allen the GAW lawsuit information gatherer... and joe mordica

You also forgot i am the Lead Developer of WorldOfHash.com Which I made a InGame Coin just for you guys. I call it BitcoinTalkScam Coin. Or Just ScamCoin. Also only thing i got in dealings with Ionomy is i traded my XPY for it. I support the team. They are good folks that got caught in a bad place. Its Funny Cause I Made money on the Gaw SCAM. I got out what the getting out was good. But i watch good people get stuck trying to fix it and help others. It just did not work out. I hope Garza get what ever he gets. Now is just a waiting game. And a Good Read on this forum.

[skinnyboy]

basicly yes. heres some quotes i saved













rocket ready to go!




ps:
jason is the same jason sponaugle who maintained and worked on the online wallet that was hacked at least twice. you can see his insanely stupid posts in the bitlend thread which he also works on with richard nelson the ionomy support director and allen the GAW lawsuit information gatherer... and joe mordica

So, basically, in their minds, it's okay to turn up in a public forum, solicit $1000000 in funding, make loads of bogus claims, say they'll respond, then just claim "I don't care, I don't have to do anything, because I don't want to"...

I don't think they understand how crypto works, I don't think they understand how business works and I don't think they understand how people work.

I also think that ethics morals and common decency are qualities which are seriously lacking.

[CryptoBuds]

Also as far as the hundreds of pages you claim to be warnings..it's actually a whole lot of bullshit that has no substance...a lot of fud and trolling

"Thousands" all bullshit

So are you saying that you still don't believe GAW to be a scam? And you are still waiting for Homero to give you $20 for each XPY? Ok then. Any chance I could sell you some ION?