GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[Phildo]

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

[1713423786]

1713423786

[truckinusa]

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

maybe we can make comments on every news story having to do with cantor and 9/11

[favdesu]

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

yep, the 9/11 scam should be highlighted. not the worst they did, but this will stick with the public

[o0o0]

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

yep, the 9/11 scam should be highlighted. not the worst they did, but this will stick with the public

looks like a wiki mod has warned cryptoedge on their talk page as they are just removing that bit constantly. Anyone that have an account care to revert cryptoedges removal and see how they play their warning out? As usual gawd homero will ignore it and remove it because he isn't a scammer right?

--EDIT--

Datguy looks to be using stiki now to flag the article and auto revert vandalism from cryptoedge so i think his reign is over. Datguy seems to be a user that goes around wikipedia against vandalism attacks on pages and does general maintenance.

[favdesu]

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

yep, the 9/11 scam should be highlighted. not the worst they did, but this will stick with the public

looks like a wiki mod has warned cryptoedge on their talk page as they are just removing that bit constantly. Anyone that have an account care to revert cryptoedges removal and see how they play their warning out? As usual gawd homero will ignore it and remove it because he isn't a scammer right?

--EDIT--

Datguy looks to be using stiki now to flag the article and auto revert vandalism from cryptoedge so i think his reign is over. Datguy seems to be a user that goes around wikipedia against vandalism attacks on pages and does general maintenance.

this is too funny. as usual, homero has no idea how wiki works.

[o0o0]

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

yep, the 9/11 scam should be highlighted. not the worst they did, but this will stick with the public

looks like a wiki mod has warned cryptoedge on their talk page as they are just removing that bit constantly. Anyone that have an account care to revert cryptoedges removal and see how they play their warning out? As usual gawd homero will ignore it and remove it because he isn't a scammer right?

--EDIT--

Datguy looks to be using stiki now to flag the article and auto revert vandalism from cryptoedge so i think his reign is over. Datguy seems to be a user that goes around wikipedia against vandalism attacks on pages and does general maintenance.

this is too funny. as usual, homero has no idea how wiki works.

Remember homero's meeting room picture with the big table? Can you imagine listening to that moron in a meeting briefing people on blockchain tech and giving the we can do it we rock speeches? i'd love to have been there to hear some of them. I bet most of his employees were like wtf is this guy going on about but who cares we'll all be rich!!!

[Phildo]

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

yep, the 9/11 scam should be highlighted. not the worst they did, but this will stick with the public

It actually is the worst thing they did.

The rest is a run of the mill crypto scam. Greedy marks giving money to a conman in hopes of untold/impossible riches.

It was taking advantage of a tragedy and claiming to do good. It might be worth a bad crypto investment to help out people in need.

[suchmoon]

It would be hilarious if this is indeed Homero. He's acting like he's moderating Hashtalk.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cryptocurrency&action=history

(cur | prev) 09:54, 27 August 2016‎ DatGuy (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (41,306 bytes) (+979)‎ . . (Reverted 1 edit by Cryptoedge identified as test/vandalism using STiki) (undo)
(cur | prev) 05:47, 27 August 2016‎ Cryptoedge (talk | contribs)‎ . . (40,327 bytes) (-979)‎ . . (Undid revision 736389161 by 83.170.104.98 (talk)) (undo)
(cur | prev) 04:35, 27 August 2016‎ 83.170.104.98 (talk)‎ . . (41,306 bytes) (+979)‎ . . (Undid revision 736381299 by Cryptoedge (talk)) (undo)
(cur | prev) 02:48, 27 August 2016‎ Cryptoedge (talk | contribs)‎ . . (40,327 bytes) (-979)‎ . . (Undid revision 736353986 by David Gerard (talk)) (undo)
(cur | prev) 22:30, 26 August 2016‎ Penbat (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,306 bytes) (-20)‎ . . (→‎List of cryptocurrencies) (undo)
(cur | prev) 22:13, 26 August 2016‎ David Gerard (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (41,326 bytes) (+979)‎ . . (Reverted edits by Cryptoedge (talk) to last version by 172.56.28.169) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:13, 26 August 2016‎ Cryptoedge (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (40,347 bytes) (-979)‎ . . (Bad Faith, Edit being manipulated. Reference: bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg16046092#msg16046092) (undo)
(cur | prev) 14:02, 26 August 2016‎ 172.56.28.169 (talk)‎ . . (41,326 bytes) (+527)‎ . . (Added Cryptsy / Paul Vernon class action lawsuit) (undo)
(cur | prev) 09:29, 26 August 2016‎ David Gerard (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (40,799 bytes) (+979)‎ . . (Reverted edits by Cryptoedge (talk) to last version by David Gerard) (undo)
(cur | prev) 02:43, 26 August 2016‎ Cryptoedge (talk | contribs)‎ . . (39,820 bytes) (-979)‎ . . (Undid revision 736222578 by David Gerard (talk)) (undo)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cryptoedge

User talk:Cryptoedge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
August 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Cryptocurrency. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 06:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cryptocurrency have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

[favdesu]

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

yep, the 9/11 scam should be highlighted. not the worst they did, but this will stick with the public

looks like a wiki mod has warned cryptoedge on their talk page as they are just removing that bit constantly. Anyone that have an account care to revert cryptoedges removal and see how they play their warning out? As usual gawd homero will ignore it and remove it because he isn't a scammer right?

--EDIT--

Datguy looks to be using stiki now to flag the article and auto revert vandalism from cryptoedge so i think his reign is over. Datguy seems to be a user that goes around wikipedia against vandalism attacks on pages and does general maintenance.

this is too funny. as usual, homero has no idea how wiki works.

Remember homero's meeting room picture with the big table? Can you imagine listening to that moron in a meeting briefing people on blockchain tech and giving the we can do it we rock speeches? i'd love to have been there to hear some of them. I bet most of his employees were like wtf is this guy going on about but who cares we'll all be rich!!!

this is how I imagine onecoin meetups. and they're pretty fucked up for anyone not retarded

[cryptofanz]

Homero's having an aneurysm.

https://i.gyazo.com/1ec77358a8e80d21d5f4cb438a51c21e.png

[favdesu]

Homero's having an aneurysm.

a "sease and disist!" - confirmed homero

[RoomBot]

Listen to the Mods, (ironic), Garbanzo:

"Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cryptocurrency have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox."

Go play in the Sandbox.

[suchmoon]

Homero's having an aneurysm.

a "sease and disist!" - confirmed homero

TBH that's a bit too much Homero, could be someone trolling.

[favdesu]

Homero's having an aneurysm.

a "sease and disist!" - confirmed homero

TBH that's a bit too much Homero, could be someone trolling.

yeah probably, doubt homer knows how to use wiki... you may be right

[truckinusa]

Just thinking maybe there is some connection?  Who knows?  https://cointelegraph.com/news/cryptoedge-solutions

Now someone has removed all the names from the fraud section.  They just don't quit.

[kken01]

wiki doesnt list names of people accused of crimes unless they are public figures

[owlcatz]

wiki doesnt list names of people accused of crimes unless they are public figures

Do you mean unless they have been proven guilty? What defines a public figure? Thanks.

[kken01]

yeah unless proven guilty. so we can add his name soon enough 

they use the same definition as in the law (US) for public figures. its debatable if you would consider garza as a business leader. i would say no.... small time crook 

Uncle Stu would fit the bill

[RoomBot]

wiki doesnt list names of people accused of crimes unless they are public figures

Do you mean unless they have been proven guilty? What defines a public figure? Thanks.

HashKing

[owlcatz]

wiki doesnt list names of people accused of crimes unless they are public figures

Do you mean unless they have been proven guilty? What defines a public figure? Thanks.

HashKing