maildir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1060
|
 |
March 22, 2017, 04:16:03 PM |
|
Thought we were dead there for a moment  Tuesday, March 21, 2017
RESPONSE re69 MOTION to Certify Class (a default judgment class for the purposes of obtaining a default judgment) MOTION for Default Judgment as to GAW Miners, LLC and ZenMiner, LLC filed by Stuart A. Fraser.(Cave, Sarah)
Exhibit A - Revised Proposed Order I can't quite make out what it is, it reads like Uncle Stu is responding to the very last plaintiff submission which was against Gaw and Zen only. Very unclear, maybe the doc "revised proposed order" explains it somehow, just don't see the tie-in with Uncle Stu when it was against the no responses from Gaw and Zen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1113
|
 |
March 23, 2017, 08:46:53 PM Last edit: March 23, 2017, 09:01:45 PM by RoomBot |
|
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH! "An Electric Gun Having Hero!" Written by Homero himself! I can haz Cheezeburger>  !!!1111 Another day, another GAW--ION--Spawned SCAM: 
|
|
|
|
pixelpowered
|
 |
March 23, 2017, 09:06:51 PM |
|
No, actually I suggest no one put the game(s) on their devices. Most likely you'll just give them more emails/pws to exploit or sell off when they fold and run again. After tracing back two years of usernames and interactions. I see con-crew that moves through BCT-> GAW/BCT/GH(gethash) -> GAW/XPY.io/Bitlend -> XPY.io/Hashtalk -> ION/Slack channel Most of the IONteam you'll see listed as having another job already, also none of them list Ionomy under their resume. Meaning they can cleanly walk away from this and host just the basics to have a seemingly legal game production company. They won't care if the games get taken down by Google Play or Apple either. They'll just make another for the skinner box. The IONteam set themselves up to centralize the platform. Treat it like a scamming cloud miner group + pointless game attached to it. They get the ideas and features by playing other more popular games from mainstream or crypto games, then attempt to apply it to their own. If you want to take a stab at the IONteam scam. Report the game to GP and Apple. 3rd party payments and also fake reviews either way you mix.
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 7852
https://bpip.org
|
 |
March 23, 2017, 10:46:13 PM |
|
Thought we were dead there for a moment  Tuesday, March 21, 2017
RESPONSE re69 MOTION to Certify Class (a default judgment class for the purposes of obtaining a default judgment) MOTION for Default Judgment as to GAW Miners, LLC and ZenMiner, LLC filed by Stuart A. Fraser.(Cave, Sarah)
Exhibit A - Revised Proposed Order I can't quite make out what it is, it reads like Uncle Stu is responding to the very last plaintiff submission which was against Gaw and Zen only. Very unclear, maybe the doc "revised proposed order" explains it somehow, just don't see the tie-in with Uncle Stu when it was against the no responses from Gaw and Zen. I updated the docs: http://ia601907.us.archive.org/18/items/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576.docket.html (scroll to the bottom) It looks like some procedural bullshit, Stu basically saying "me ain't involved with GAW or Zen, for real". That Mcnulty dude might be real - he was borrowing money for PNGs on BTCJam back in the day. But the bikini reviews are ridiculously fake. Some mention features that don't exist or straight-up bullshit like "I was playing the game since I was 5". iTunes is equally fake. 111 positive reviews with some random names but they end abruptly on March 12. Not a single review since then. I did a fresh install and without even playing the game it put me at 40-something on the weekly leaderboard. So you can imagine how popular it is if it has less than 50 active players for the whole week. More here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.6360
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1113
|
 |
March 23, 2017, 10:51:15 PM |
|
Thought we were dead there for a moment  Tuesday, March 21, 2017
RESPONSE re69 MOTION to Certify Class (a default judgment class for the purposes of obtaining a default judgment) MOTION for Default Judgment as to GAW Miners, LLC and ZenMiner, LLC filed by Stuart A. Fraser.(Cave, Sarah)
Exhibit A - Revised Proposed Order I can't quite make out what it is, it reads like Uncle Stu is responding to the very last plaintiff submission which was against Gaw and Zen only. Very unclear, maybe the doc "revised proposed order" explains it somehow, just don't see the tie-in with Uncle Stu when it was against the no responses from Gaw and Zen. I updated the docs: http://ia601907.us.archive.org/18/items/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576.docket.html (scroll to the bottom) It looks like some procedural bullshit, Stu basically saying "me ain't involved with GAW or Zen, for real". That Mcnulty dude might be real - he was borrowing money for PNGs on BTCJam back in the day. Then why can't he type his own name correctly?
|
|
|
|
owlcatz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1616
Coldkey™ Official Support
|
 |
March 23, 2017, 11:11:49 PM |
|
I reported the game and told Google play it was a bunch of bitcoin scammers and linked them to this thread and the one on slack...  Fuck them and their scam game... I even told google the reviews were fake as well. Adam Mcnulty is that UK "Trugainz" guy, so yeah he actually appears real, but who knows... 
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1113
|
 |
March 23, 2017, 11:16:13 PM |
|
I reported the game and told Google play it was a bunch of bitcoin scammers and linked them to this thread and the one on slack...  Fuck them and their scam game... I even told google the reviews were fake as well. Adam Mcnulty is that UK "Trugainz" guy, so yeah he actually appears real, but who knows...  Excellent work. Care to share contact info for Google Play? Please don't say "Bitcoin" scammers. They're not. Yeah, he can't type or spell his name.....It should have been a rhetorical question. 
|
|
|
|
maildir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1060
|
 |
March 25, 2017, 09:50:22 AM |
|
 Friday, March 24, 2017
RULING AND ORDERS: The Court addresses herein multiple pending motions. First, the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 41] is DENIED because it does not address the operative complaint. The Court will consider the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 61] the operative complaint in due course. Second, for the reasons set forth in Plaintiffs' memorandum, [ECF No. 68-1], the order granting motion for default entry under Rule 55(a) as to GAW Miners, LLC and Zenminer, LLC [ECF No. 65], including the deadline to file a motion for default judgment by March 1, 2017, is VACATED , and the motion for default entry as to GAW Miners, LLC and Zenminer, LLC with respect to the First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 68] is GRANTED . The request for extension of time in [ECF No. 68] is DENIED as moot. The motion to certify class and motion for default judgment [ECF No. 69] are DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Any renewed motion for default judgment and/or to certify class with respect to the defaulting defendants shall address not only whether the Court's ruling on such motions before ruling on the motion to dismiss would violate the stay provision of the PSLRA, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(3), including any applicable precedents within the Second Circuit, but also (a) whether entering a default judgment as to some defendants before the case is concluded as to all defendants would, under the circumstances of this case, violate the principles set forth in Frow v. De La Vega , 82 U.S. 552, 554 (1872) or otherwise risk the possibility of inconsistent judgments, see Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Watson , 2012 WL 4097731 (D. Conn. Sept. 10, 2012), and (b) whether it would serve the interest of judicial economy to entertain class certification proceedings with respect to the defaulting defendants and then, should the court deny some or all of the motion to dismiss by Defendant Fraser, potentially do so again with respect to him. The Court notes that a brief review of the amended complaint suggests that it sets forth separate claims for relief against Mr. Fraser and the defaulting defendants, but that some of the issues in those claims may overlap (e.g., falsity of statements). Especially in light of the concerns raised by Frow , the Plaintiffs are not required to renew these motions promptly and may, if they choose, wait to do so until after the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss (which would obviate the need to address the stay issue) and/or after the Court enters any judgment with respect to Defendant Fraser. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/24/2017. (Howard, H.)
|
|
|
|
maildir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1060
|
 |
March 25, 2017, 10:08:18 AM |
|
[ ECF No. 41] Is Uncle Stu's original: MOTION to Dismiss by Stuart A. Fraser.Responses due by 10/18/2016 (Cave, Sarah) (Entered: 09/27/2016) [ECF No. 61] Is his motion to dismiss the amended complain: MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint by Stuart A. Fraser.Responses due by 12/27/2016 (Cave, Sarah) (Entered: 12/06/2016) It is all interesting in that the way it reads the Judge is pissed off. We said it earlier it can go two ways either cut and dry depending on the Judge's mood or demeanor. Accept Uncle Stu's steadfast insistence that the law specifically states that he must have had control full stop. Or the overall whine of the plaintiff's all encompassing long sad story will sway him to their side. That seems to be the case. Then again he could give one to each side. Denied Uncle Stu's original request to dismiss but give him his request to dismiss the amended complaint. Got to be some reason the Judge will address that second one a little later on. All got to say is I feel for anyone in the legal business, so much bullshit back and forth, of course if you are not personally involved and just collect a pay check, what the hell. Got to be a nail biter from start to finish for a defendant or a plaintiff that is for sure. Of course Homero lacks a normal human's amount of brain cells, so none of this affects him other than basking in the glory of being involved in something serious.  Elon and the SEC are still waiting in the wings ... Homero 
|
|
|
|
maildir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1060
|
 |
March 26, 2017, 01:42:02 AM |
|
Speak of the devil, the SEC has woken up  Friday, March 24, 2017
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Shields, Kathleen) Not every exciting, think we have been down this road before: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26
|
|
|
|
truckinusa
|
 |
March 26, 2017, 03:19:22 AM |
|
Is this some sort of arbitration between the parties? It looks like it may have a 14 day time limit. Just another delay tactic perhaps?
|
|
|
|
maildir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1060
|
 |
March 27, 2017, 11:37:00 AM |
|
Here's a better explanation: https://www.law360.com/articles/24620/rule-26-f-and-automatic-stays-in-securities-litigationI think it boils down to this The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolutionJust a means to speed things up.
|
|
|
|
truckinusa
|
 |
March 27, 2017, 11:45:12 AM |
|
We got the emails, photos, etc if the SEC needs them. Did I say we had the photos?
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1113
|
 |
March 27, 2017, 01:48:55 PM |
|
We got the emails, photos, etc if the SEC needs them. Did I say we had the photos? SEC got all of it. Trust me. 
|
|
|
|
truckinusa
|
 |
March 27, 2017, 02:50:37 PM |
|
We got the emails, photos, etc if the SEC needs them. Did I say we had the photos? SEC got all of it. Trust me.  I'm being serious, but I wonder what kind of information they really have. The government always strikes me as bumbling and stupid when things are incredibly obvious.
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1113
|
 |
March 27, 2017, 08:54:57 PM Last edit: March 27, 2017, 09:32:10 PM by RoomBot |
|
Don't worry, @truckinusa They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?) They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack. Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we? GAW Miners Paycoin Hashlets BTC Lend PayBase CoinStand CPIG What did I forget? Edits: CoinSwap Prime Controllers <------  Cryptsy Prime Controller
|
|
|
|
owlcatz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1616
Coldkey™ Official Support
|
 |
March 27, 2017, 09:27:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1113
|
 |
March 27, 2017, 09:29:57 PM Last edit: March 27, 2017, 09:40:08 PM by RoomBot |
|
Good one! That reminded me of how GARZA RUINED CoinSwap Exchange and contaminated Cryptsy Exchange too.
|
|
|
|
owlcatz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1616
Coldkey™ Official Support
|
 |
March 27, 2017, 10:06:57 PM |
|
yeah, guy is like crypto cancer. Let's hope they nuke his butt someday. I can't believe we are all still here. I never imagined it would go on so long and so deep.
|
|
|
|
|