Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 01:31:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: File Security Question  (Read 313 times)
c789 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 850
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2015, 05:39:20 AM
 #1

Let's say I have several wallet.dat files in a 2MB TrueCrypt vault. I'm somewhat sketchy on TrueCrypt's security, so if I encrypted the TrueCrypt file itself with:

Code:
gpg -c --cipher-algo AES256 trueCryptFile.file

...does that pretty much guarantee that my wallets can't be cracked?

  • The wallet.dat files have a 20+ character password.
  • The TrueCrypt vault has a different 20+ character password.
  • The gpg passphrase has a different 20+ character password.

My intentions are to upload the the gpg-encrypted TrueCrypt vault to several different servers over sftp. There is some risk of someone getting the encrypted file, one of which is because the servers are VPSs.

Please, let's not get into whether or not TrueCrypt is safe. All I know is that questions were raised but nobody has definitively proven it to be unsafe. I just want to know how hard it would be for someone to crack my wallet files given these 3 levels of encryption.

Comparison of Privacy-Centric Coins: https://moneroforcash.com/monero-vs-dash-vs-zcash-vs-bitcoinmixers.php also includes Verge and Pivx
1715563914
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715563914

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715563914
Reply with quote  #2

1715563914
Report to moderator
1715563914
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715563914

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715563914
Reply with quote  #2

1715563914
Report to moderator
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715563914
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715563914

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715563914
Reply with quote  #2

1715563914
Report to moderator
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2015, 09:38:00 AM
 #2

The story with TrueCrypt is a bit of a mystery. It was allegedely safe and even recommended by Snowden until a certain point in time.
Read this and this.

AFAIK GPG encryption is very strong and it's usually the password that is the weakest link. Someone recommend using this:
Code:
gpg -c --force-mdc --s2k-mode 3 --s2k-count 65011712 personal.zip
Source

So it really depends on your password. It's not really about the length but the quality; Something like this: mypasswordis123andisveryweak (28 characters); is always going to be weaker than: i=4Ma(r*2sAm!@Hf2z4 (19).
You should also read this .

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
c789 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 850
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2015, 02:12:28 PM
 #3

Good tips - thanks, LaudaM.

Comparison of Privacy-Centric Coins: https://moneroforcash.com/monero-vs-dash-vs-zcash-vs-bitcoinmixers.php also includes Verge and Pivx
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!