Albert Einstein: Plagiarist and Fraud

[catch.me.if.you.can]

Albert Einstein is today revered as “the Father of Modern Science”. His wrinkled face and wild hair has become a symbol for scientific genius and “his” famous E = mc^2 equation is repeatedly used as the symbol for something scientific and intellectual. And yet there has for years been mounting evidence that this “Father of Modern Science” was nothing but a con man, lying about his ideas and achievements, and stealing the work and the research of others.

The most glaring evidence against Einstein concerns “his” most famous equation. One website notes “The equation E=mc^2, which has been forever linked to Einstein & his Theory of Relativity was not originally published by Einstein. According to Umberto Bartocci, a professor at the University of Perugia and a historian of mathematics, this famous equation was first published by Olinto De Pretto …two years prior to Einstein’s publishing of the equation. In 1903 De Pretto published his equation in the scientific magazine Atte and in 1904 it was republished by the Royal Science Institute of Veneto. Einstein’s research was not published until 1905… Einstein was well versed in Italian and even lived in Northern Italy for a brief time.”

It is unheard of to pass over the original inventor of an equation and to give credit to someone, who claims to have derived it AFTER the equation and its derivation have been published. The equation “E=mc^2″ should be called the “De Pretto Equation” not the “Einstein Equation.”

This raises the question: “What sort of man was Einstein?” Is there evidence that he may have been prone to unethical behavior? One website reports “Einstein… was still far from the ideal husband. A year before they married, Maric gave birth to a daughter, Lieserl, while Einstein was away. The child’s fate is unknown – she is presumed to have been given up for adoption, perhaps under pressure from Einstein, who is thought to have never seen his first born. After the marriage, Mileva bore two sons but the family was not to stay together. Einstein began an affair with his cousin Elsa Lowenthal while on a trip to Berlin in 1912, leaving Mileva and his family two years later. Einstein and Mileva finally divorced in 1919, but not until after Einstein sent his wife a list of ‘conditions’ under which he was willing to remain married. The list included such autocratic demands as ‘You are neither to expect intimacy nor to reproach me in any way’. After the divorce, he saw little of his sons. The elder, Hans Albert, later reflected ‘Probably the only project he ever gave up on was me.’ The younger, Eduard, was diagnosed with schizophrenia and died in an asylum. Einstein married Elsa soon after the divorce, but a few years later began an affair with Betty Neumann, the niece of a friend… Accusations of plagiarism aren’t limited to Mileva – it’s also been claimed that Einstein stole the work of a host of other physicists. One question which may remain moot is quite how much Einstein drew from the work of Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincare in formulating the theory of special relativity. Elements of Einstein’s 1905 paper paralleled parts of a 1904 paper by Lorentz and a contemporary paper by Poincare. Although Einstein read earlier papers by the two, he claimed not to have seen these later works before writing the 1905 paper. One apparently damning fact is that the 1905 paper on special relativity had no references, suggesting that Einstein was consciously hiding his tracks.”

One source notes “David Hilbert submitted an article containing the correct field equations for general relativity five days before Einstein.” Another source notes “Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of his.” Apparently Hilbert’s work was soon to become “Einstein’s work.”

The historic record is readily available and the truth is known to many scientists and historians, even if they are afraid to say anything. The idea that light had a finite speed was proven by Michelson and Morley decades before Einstein. Hendrik Lorentz determined the equations showing relativistic time and length contractions which become significant as the speed of light is approached. These gentlemen along with David Hilbert and Olinto De Pretto have been airbrushed out of the picture so that Einstein could be given the credit for what they had done.

Einstein appeared to latch onto his first wife, a much more talented student three years his senior, to compensate for his own limited abilities. Another website notes: “…in 1927, H. Thirring wrote, ‘H. Poincare had already completely solved the problem of time several years before the appearance of Einstein’s first work (1905). . . .’ Sir Edmund Whittaker in his detailed survey, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Volume II, (1953), included a chapter entitled ‘The Relativity Theory of Poincare and Lorentz’. Whittaker thoroughly documented the development of the theory, documenting the authentic history, and demonstrated through reference to primary sources that Einstein held no priority for the vast majority of the theory. Einstein offered no counter-argument to Whittaker’s famous book. . .”

Einstein was a minor contributor at best and in any case an intellectual thief and pretentious braggart. Einstein was still alive when Whitaker’s book was published and he said NOTHING about it. No libel suit, no refutation, no public comment at all.

Einstein was the first great fraudster and idea-thief in modern science. His theft of Olinto De Pretto’s equation E = mc^2 gave him considerable scientific credibility which he built a career on. De Pretto was not a career physicist and spent his life as an industrialist, passing away in 1921. De Pretto had published his equation twice before Einstein and was no doubt amazed that someone could claim credit for his work. Einstein used and eventually discarded his first wife, Mileva, who was a much more brilliant student than Einstein and is suspected of writing much of Einstein’s early work. (She may have been reluctant to expose Einstein since he was still the father of her children.) David Hilbert’s work on the equations for Special Relativity was submitted for publication before Einstein and was sent to Einstein as correspondence. Einstein claimed credit for the equations which Hilbert derived. (David Hilbert passed away in 1943.)

Some university professors have stolen work from their graduate students and it would be interesting to see if any of Einstein’s students complained of such thievery. A plagiarist seldom stops plagiarizing especially when he keeps getting away with it. Complaints against Einstein however seem to disappear down the Orwellian memory hole. Einstein is clearly a sacred cow to many. A few have even used the word “heresy” to describe serious well-documented criticism and charges of plagiarism against Einstein. The truth eventually wins out and Einstein will someday be best known as a great fraud instead of a great physicist

source: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=13400

[1713508862]

1713508862

[gordoh]

Im sorry but this is ridiculous. How can Einstein's work be questioned after all these years? Why would this information take so long to surface?

This is nothing more than a conspiracy theory in my opinion, And I find it appalling that people would write such things about one of the greatest minds that ever lived.

[ndnh]

There are contraversies about everything.

Edison also did not invent the light bulb
Alleged inventor: Thomas Edison
Actual Inventor: Sir Humphry Davy

Marconi never invented the radio
Alleged inventor: Guglielmo Marconi
Actual Inventor: Nikola Tesla

http://www.businessinsider.com/10-items-not-invented-by-who-you-think-2011-8?IR=T

read 1st para of : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shivkar_Bapuji_Talpade
Still he is not the first too...

[Lauda]

Why would you even question this? Does it matter, does it change anything?
People should stop looking backwards so much and start moving forward. If we keep this up we will be stuck on this stupid planet forever..

I however think that this is just another lame conspiracy theory. In 50-100 years: Google didn't invent Google glass. 

[vm1990]

satochi invented everything simple as everyone else just stole his ideas

[Omikifuse]

Im sorry but this is ridiculous. How can Einstein's work be questioned after all these years? Why would this information take so long to surface?

This is nothing more than a conspiracy theory in my opinion, And I find it appalling that people would write such things about one of the greatest minds that ever lived.

The questionings are not from today.

Never bothered to see if they make or not sense because I'm more interested in the theories themselves, that does not depend on who creatd them

[nsimmons]

I don't know who calls him the father of modern science and i disagree, modern science is the quantum level, not the macroscopic level of general relativity. There's been very little progress towards fundamental understanding of gravity...I'm still waiting for the graviton.

He didn't come up with the Lorentz contraction either, but he was the person who pieced everything together. These other scientists aren't marginalized, we call it a Lorentz contraction, Hilbert space, the Michelson and Morley disproved the ether.

Again you are leaving out the entire equation


The (pc)^2 is the critical part, this is the part that sets the speed of light as a speed limit. The p is momentum, energy use increases at the square of momentum, this is critical to ideas of faster than light travel, not conversion of mass to energy in the mc^2 part.

And this one


The gamma is called the Lorentz factor, not the Einstein factor.

None of this matter though, this is all special relativity.

The general theory and the Einstein field equations are the true breakthrough, besides he won the Nobel prize for the photo electric effect, how solar panels work, not relativity special or general.

[notbatman]

...
He didn't come up with the Lorentz contraction either, but he was the person who pieced everything together. These other scientists aren't marginalized, we call it a Lorentz contraction, Hilbert space, the Michelson and Morley disproved the ether.
...

The M&M experiment is bunk, what they did was like trying to mesure the wind speed outside of a moving car with the anemometer inside the cab and the windows rolled up.

[nsimmons]

...
He didn't come up with the Lorentz contraction either, but he was the person who pieced everything together. These other scientists aren't marginalized, we call it a Lorentz contraction, Hilbert space, the Michelson and Morley disproved the ether.
...

The M&M experiment is bunk, what they did was like trying to mesure the wind speed outside of a moving car with the anemometer inside the cab and the windows rolled up.

Yep you're right...you are saying the experiment couldn't detect the medium light was supposed to travel in, because it wasn't in the medium, except that they could physically see the apparatus, which means there is light, which means its should be in the medium...

oh wait...

Is the counter argument 'bunk' mathematically rigorous? The experiment used Galilean relativity, not even Einstein reformulation, the velocity of the planet though space didn't add or subtract to lights relative velocity. It is counter intuitive that a light wave, as opposed to any other wave, doesn't need a medium to travel in. Once induction was understood by Faraday, it is intuitive how a electric wave can propagate itself when the magnetic perpendicular component is factored in. Or do we not understand radio waves?

Arguing for the ether is arguing for a flat earth.

About plagiarism, I just took these. Let the man speak for himself.






Please cite plagiarism

[cocos]

All waves need a medium to travel. The medium for the electromagnetic waves is the AETHER. THE FIFTH ELEMENT.

[Page1]

AL EINstein was a pawn for aliens to give mankind the keys to their destruction, nukes.

ALIEN

AL EINstein

He actually had a small brain well undersized compared to a normal male brain, perfect for ALIEN communication and manipulation

https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/ein.html

[notbatman]

...
Is the counter argument 'bunk' mathematically rigorous? ...
...

Yes, and I can prove it.

Code:

bunk * 1 = 0

"... In 1820, Felix Walker, who represented Buncombe County, North Carolina, in the U.S. House of Representatives, rose to address the question of admitting Missouri as a free or slave state. This was his first attempt to speak on this subject after nearly a month of solid debate and right before the vote was to be called. Allegedly, to the exasperation of his colleagues, Walker insisted on delivering a long and wearisome ''speech for Buncombe.'' He was shouted down by his colleagues. His persistent effort made ''buncomb'' (later respelled ''bunkum'') a synonym for meaningless political claptrap and later for any kind of nonsense. ..." -- wiki

 

[notbatman]

BTW, the spelling æther helps avoid confusion with the organic compound.

[Nunu]

wait how can you prove this even happened, if einstein jacked peoples work..

[nsimmons]

All waves need a medium to travel. The medium for the electromagnetic waves is the ETHER. THE FIFTH ELEMENT.

[b!z]

AL EINstein was a pawn for aliens to give mankind the keys to their destruction, nukes.

ALIEN

AL EINstein

He actually had a small brain well undersized compared to a normal male brain, perfect for ALIEN communication and manipulation

https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/ein.html

Makes perfect sense. I blame big oil, the Illuminati, and FIFA for this one.

[cocos]

(Google translate)

"....Experiment Cern: The resurrection of the ether as a fifth element.

The notorious "unknown" link of matter, the Higgs boson is the springboard for the much-known international work as an experiment in CERN. Once again in modern times, truths spoken thousands of years ago, returning to great discoveries. Thus, while the descriptions of the solar system was given and extinct for centuries, as epanerchonto achievements materialistic culture. What if the hapless Copernicus made explicit references to the work of Aristarchus, modern leaders, insist the show as a groundbreaking researcher. What if Plato and Pythagoras had analyzed the morphology and sphericity of the Earth and the solar system, modern scientists until the 70s believed that the planets is 7, while still searching the Tenth (Antichthon).

So far, the experiment of Cern, attempt to restore with scientific proof of the existence of ether as a fifth element, the binder material. While well aware that the Ether element as was accepted by Descartes, Copernicus, Newton, Tesla, Faraday and many others. The assumption of the existence owe electricity, magnetism and many other applications that we enjoy today. Even nuclear energy.

THE GROUNDS OF ETHER APOKRYPSIS

While it may seem excessive, the existence of Ether hushed because nullify Religious and materialistic beliefs. The presence of the ether as a fifth element, giving 'divine' status in the very nature explaining many of the secrets of creation. So shoot down the monopoly of Messianistic religions based their authority to represent the supreme supernatural power.

The Materialism, concealed the power of Ether reasons for interest. The management of Ether can offer a large sum of cheap energy, canceling the power structure of monopoly power as leverage.

The coup de grace scientific burial ether was the theory of relativity, the theory has already been refuted experimentally! Einstein even practically handed the management of the ether as the final ingredient to create the Atomic Bomb. Creation which is still the ultimate instrument of power....."

"...Theorists of New Physics believe that Ether doesnt obeys the notorious Law of Thermodynamics, which argue that energy can not be created nor destroyed, only to change his form. For these energy always existed and always will exist. There is no need to be created or destroyed. What is needed is a new Einstein will overcome the laws of conservation of energy and create a theoretical framework on which to build the new etheric technology (Aether Technology). The problem is that people refuse to believe that they have unlimited possibilities in front of them, enough to properly exploit the intelligence and instincts. Our planet is suffocating under the current energy model, based on the combustion of carbon compounds. The Earth can not wait any longer. Revolutionaries need not tomorrow, but today. Not only words, but also action. "The triumph of evil is for good to do nothing» (Edmund Burke)..."

[b!z]

Yeah dude you're right, this Aether thing is the next big thing. It's going to be even bigger than bitcoin. I totally knew Einstein was a space reptile all this time. WAKE UP SHEEPLE

[Page1]

Aether is just the Hologram Universe theory, we're inside an AI computer or illusion

www.HologramUniverse.org

Best book I've seen on it

The ancient concept of Aether and the Buddhist concept of ILLUSION all pointed to pure energy inside an AI computer

The computer sets the rules and your DNA program gives the illusion to your reality

Pretty simple actually if you start to look at the universe as a virtual universe and aether as the energy within it

[AcerGreen]

This is about just as plausible as the moonlandings being faked.