Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 08:15:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: If Satoshi was like Ripple Labs  (Read 1580 times)
TaunSew (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 506


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 09:06:44 PM
 #1

If Satoshi was like Ripple Labs + Founders, he would own more than 11 million BTC.   Shocked

There ain't no Revolution like a NEMolution.  The only solution is Bitcoin's dissolution! NEM!
1715415316
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715415316

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715415316
Reply with quote  #2

1715415316
Report to moderator
1715415316
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715415316

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715415316
Reply with quote  #2

1715415316
Report to moderator
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715415316
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715415316

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715415316
Reply with quote  #2

1715415316
Report to moderator
ParabellumLite
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 09:10:45 PM
 #2

If Satoshi was like Ripple Labs + Founders, he would own more than 11 million BTC.   Shocked

Trust -11. Yeah, I'll go with what you say. Also founders = not the same as Ripple Labs. It is a common mistake I see going around here quite regularly.
redsn0w
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 09:12:13 PM
 #3



The best meme of 2014 , very nice work  Grin *awesome*.
solid12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 27, 2014, 10:19:51 PM
 #4

No one here gets that there is not 1 person in the world who even owns as much a percentage of a fiat currency as Satoshi does.

Satoshi owns almost 8% of the current Bitcoins mined, that is staggering. Not even the wealthiest people in the world hold even  close to 1% of the US dollar supply. It is not a healthy ratio and I just pray the coins are never released in the wild or are given away en masse. Imagine if Bitcoin became the world's reserve currency, Satoshi would own almost a tenth of the world's supply of that wealth!

Anyway it's frivolous to even compare them, XRP is not designed as a currency to be used by millions of people for everyday use in buying goods and services, it's more of a platform. Are you going to bitch that buying shares in IBM was 100% premined?
Spoetnik
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011


FUD Philanthropist™


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 11:16:24 PM
 #5

At least Satoshi earned them by mining them.
Ripple guys can not say the same..

Ripple = centralized scammy garbage cash grab

FUD first & ask questions later™
princesultan1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 28, 2014, 01:26:44 AM
 #6

At least Satoshi earned them by mining them.
Ripple guys can not say the same..

Ripple = centralized scammy garbage cash grab

Actually ripple did mine them...
BayAreaCoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 1242


Owner at AltQuick.com & FreeBitcoins.com


View Profile WWW
November 28, 2014, 01:27:34 AM
 #7



bahaha

https://AltQuick.com/exchange/ - Trade altcoins & Bitcoin Testnet coins with real Bitcoin. Fast, private, and easy!
https://FreeBitcoins.com/faucet/ - Load your AltQuick exchange account with free Bitcoins & Testnet every 10 minutes.
solid12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 28, 2014, 07:49:32 AM
 #8

At least Satoshi earned them by mining them.
Ripple guys can not say the same..

Ripple = centralized scammy garbage cash grab

Microsoft is a cash grab, IBM is a cash grab, Facebook, Google, Nike, Toyota, they are all cash grabs.

Welcome to modern society.

TaunSew (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 506


View Profile
November 28, 2014, 08:40:46 AM
 #9

At least Satoshi earned them by mining them.
Ripple guys can not say the same..

Ripple = centralized scammy garbage cash grab

Microsoft is a cash grab, IBM is a cash grab, Facebook, Google, Nike, Toyota, they are all cash grabs.

Welcome to modern society.



Lol @ comparing Ripple to Microsoft and IBM.

Microsoft and IBM has hundreds of millions of customers over the decades.  Ripple is just a con game involving thousands.

By the way - those companies pay a dividend to their stockholders, so they are not "cash grabs" like Ripple.  Ripple wants you to exchange your real dollars and Bitcoins for magic internet XRP.

There ain't no Revolution like a NEMolution.  The only solution is Bitcoin's dissolution! NEM!
gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 28, 2014, 04:46:20 PM
 #10

neither bitcoin nor ripple are fit to be wide adopted currency because of the bad distribution. Something else, FAIR and with better distribution will come along. In the end not the most innovative crypto will be the biggest store of wealth but the one with the best distribution, the fairest. Bitcoin fails because of satoshis greed. It's harsh but that's reality.
People will ultimately not adopt a thing where one single person or group has such big control/influence as serious currency.

Just not going to happen. Collective wisdom and such.

Sorry to pop your pink bubble of dreams.
hypostatization
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 28, 2014, 05:00:32 PM
 #11

neither bitcoin nor ripple are fit to be wide adopted currency because of the bad distribution. Something else, FAIR and with better distribution will come along. In the end not the most innovative crypto will be the biggest store of wealth but the one with the best distribution, the fairest. Bitcoin fails because of satoshis greed. It's harsh but that's reality.
People will ultimately not adopt a thing where one single person or group has such big control/influence as serious currency.

Just not going to happen.

I disagree. Ripple is a network of many currencies, and XRP plays a special role in that system. Utility of the Ripple network for external currencies drives a need for XRP. Ripple enables you to more easily spend and exchange your preferred currency.

A great example of the utility Ripple provides to external currencies is the SmartyCash VISA card. Ripple integration enables BTC, LTC, JPY, CNY users to fund their card using cross-currency payment from those currencies. XRP, in a sense, acts as a universal currency translator.

I am also a huge fan of Bitcoin and do not see it going anywhere. I do not see the future of currency as a zero sum game. I hope for a future of many competing currencies. Multi-currency platforms will have an important role to play in that future. I expect Bitcoin, for reason of its existing value and passionate adoption, will continue to play a significant role in that world as well.

xrptalk.org :: setup a wallet + trade all currencies :: gateway reviews @ coinist.co :: deposit to buy xrp @ snapswap [now supporting PayPal withdrawls + instant ACH transfer deposits]
CrossCoin Ventures startup accelerator - offering XRP funding up to $50,000 USD equivalent
God27
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

The 4th industrial revolution!


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 01:16:21 AM
 #12

neither bitcoin nor ripple are fit to be wide adopted currency because of the bad distribution. Something else, FAIR and with better distribution will come along. In the end not the most innovative crypto will be the biggest store of wealth but the one with the best distribution, the fairest. Bitcoin fails because of satoshis greed. It's harsh but that's reality.
People will ultimately not adopt a thing where one single person or group has such big control/influence as serious currency.

Just not going to happen. Collective wisdom and such.

Sorry to pop your pink bubble of dreams.

 Well even if you don't believe we will distribute them fairly, whatever that means, why does that matter? Our goal is to build an open source payment network that anyone in the world can use, that allows people to send money around the internet practically nothing, and that allows people to store value in a non-inflating currency. Once we have done that do you really care if some people out there are rich? The fact that bill gates has way more USD than I do doesn't make USD any less useful to me.

That said we have a strong economic incentive to distribute the coins as fair as we can. We want to get as many people to have coins as possible. This is what will make the network viable. It doesn't help us to hoard all the coins if no one is using the network.

But if you don't believe we have our own economic interests in mind then just ignore xrp and just use ripple to send around other currencies. If you just do that you really shouldn't care what happens to our stash of xrp.

BitmoreCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 02, 2014, 12:54:48 PM
 #13

neither bitcoin nor ripple are fit to be wide adopted currency because of the bad distribution. Something else, FAIR and with better distribution will come along. In the end not the most innovative crypto will be the biggest store of wealth but the one with the best distribution, the fairest. Bitcoin fails because of satoshis greed. It's harsh but that's reality.
People will ultimately not adopt a thing where one single person or group has such big control/influence as serious currency.

Just not going to happen. Collective wisdom and such.

Sorry to pop your pink bubble of dreams.

Satoshi did not premine or instamine the coins.
erre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1205



View Profile
December 02, 2014, 12:59:16 PM
 #14

neither bitcoin nor ripple are fit to be wide adopted currency because of the bad distribution. Something else, FAIR and with better distribution will come along. In the end not the most innovative crypto will be the biggest store of wealth but the one with the best distribution, the fairest. Bitcoin fails because of satoshis greed. It's harsh but that's reality.
People will ultimately not adopt a thing where one single person or group has such big control/influence as serious currency.

Just not going to happen. Collective wisdom and such.

Sorry to pop your pink bubble of dreams.

Satoshi did not premine or instamine the coins.

He did not. But the results are the same.
I won't worry about satoshi, but there's an oligarchy of " early adopters"  who control most of the coins.
In my vision,  this can'take be good and is currently the major problem of btc.

Roll a dice FOR FREE every hour, and win up to $200 in btc ---> CLICK HERE

Tip me using the LIGHTING NETWORK! -->https://tippin.me/@Erre96344121
solid12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 02, 2014, 02:33:58 PM
 #15


Satoshi did not premine or instamine the coins.

He "easy mined" them however. This IMO is the biggest bane of Bitcoin, that early adopters got mega payouts, not saying early adopters shouldn't get rewarded but the emission curve for BTC was silly and allowed a handful of people to take the lion's share of the coins, with alot less electricity and hardware investment I might add. If Bitcoin was meant to truly change the world then why is it in only 5 years since its existence do you need a mammoth mining farm to find blocks? There wasn't enough time for the real world to catch up to the technology and for the average "little guy" to get in and start mining and get a decent return. The difficulty rose too high too fast and too many percentage of coins were released out in the wild.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!