Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2018, 02:19:16 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 [155] 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 »
  Print  
Author Topic: 📈 NastyFans: The Bitcoin Enthusiast Fan Club (est. 2012)  (Read 922604 times)
Squirrel Dearing
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 12, 2015, 08:33:31 PM
 #3081

Nobody seemed to comment, but the DNS server run by our hosting provider went down again.  We are exploring options to resolve this issue going forward, as it appears our host is unable to provide this basic service reliably.  Everything is fixed for the moment, but hopefully an independent long term solution will be reached soon.  I apologize for any miners or fans who were negatively effected by this outage.

I saw that but have been SO crazy busy lately that I haven't had the chance to PM anyone!  Glad you've gotten it resolved for now.

███████████████████
███████████████████
███████████████████
██████       ██████
██████       ██████
██████       ██████
██████       ██████
██████       ██████
██████▀██████▄
██████ ▀██████▄
██████  ▀██████▄
██████   ▀██████▄
██████    ▀██████▄
REOS█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
         ▄▄▄▄██████▄▄▄▄▄
    ████████████████████████
    █████████████████████████
    █████████████████████████
    █████████████████████████
    ████████████████████████▌
    ████████████████████████▌
    ████████████████████████▌
    ████████████████████████▌
 ▄█████████▄
███████▄██████▀▀
██▀     ▀▀▀██████▀██▀▀▀
██▄     ██▄   ▀▀▀▄██
 ▀█████  ▀█████████▀
Introducing
REOSchain™
|The blockchain that digs
out the true value of
social media content
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
[]
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1261


Quoth the Raven "Nevermore."


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2015, 12:17:52 PM
 #3082

ANTMINER S5+ 7.722TH/S


 
Specifications:
  • Hash Rate: 7722 GH/s ±5%
  • Power Consumption: 3436W (at the wall, with AC/DC 93% efficiency, 25℃ ambient temp)
  • Power Efficiency: 0.445W/GH (at the wall, with AC/DC 93% efficiency, 25℃ ambient temp)
  • Rated Voltage: 12V
  • Chip Process: 28nm
  • Chip quantity per unit: 432x BM1384
  • Dimensions: 275 mm x 372 mm x 155 mm
  • Cooling: 6x 12038 fan
  • Operating Conditions: 0 °C to 40 °C
  • Network Connection: Ethernet

I sold an S5 in order to purchase a new S5+ from Bitmain for NastyMining.  It should ship on Monday.

          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
.
|
.
|
          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
unthy
valkir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 12:22:16 PM
 #3083

Awesome! Nice news for nasty mining.  Grin

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 593
Merit: 542



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 11:21:58 PM
 #3084

Distribution 369877 is complete. nastyfans thanks the donators.

Last 4 weeks distribution NastyPoP payout rates (vs. expected):
window35 0.00011499 BTC per GH/s (166.8%)
window36 0.00010225 BTC per GH/s (151.5%)
window37 0.00003583 BTC per GH/s (53.2%)
window38 0.00016487 BTC per GH/s (246.7%)

naypalm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1266
Merit: 1003


coins coins coins!


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2015, 02:20:49 AM
 #3085

Very cool, thank you nonnakip!

snarlpill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


Affordable US Shipping- cryptoplanet.co/shiptips


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2015, 02:32:54 AM
 #3086

Looking to sell 6 NastyFans seats for below market value (aka a quick sale, looking to use the extra funds towards a graded Chinese Panda coin purchase!)
PM if interested


UPDATE: I have sold the 6 seats to a fellow NastyFan in a private sale for BTC, and have asked nonnakip to transfer the seats to his account.

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1261


Quoth the Raven "Nevermore."


View Profile WWW
August 20, 2015, 06:43:05 AM
 #3087

The S5+ is up and running.  I currently have it mining on NiceHash to see some individual stats on it.

You can see it running here:
https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=1NastyFRkeUTmMdbMmzggDVTQA6r3ibUoX&a=1&l=1

          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
.
|
.
|
          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
unthy
kroneko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 11



View Profile
August 20, 2015, 10:57:14 AM
 #3088

The S5+ is up and running.  I currently have it mining on NiceHash to see some individual stats on it.

You can see it running here:
https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=1NastyFRkeUTmMdbMmzggDVTQA6r3ibUoX&a=1&l=1

Awesome!  Happy hashing!!!
valkir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 20, 2015, 11:04:32 AM
 #3089

This is huge!  Grin Good job OgNasty!

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
plasticAiredale
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 20, 2015, 11:36:56 AM
 #3090

Awesome. Great to see the continuing improvement of Nasty Mining. Smiley
nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 593
Merit: 542



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 07:39:57 PM
 #3091

Distribution 370902 is complete. nastyfans appreciates the donations.

Last 4 weeks distribution NastyPoP payout rates (vs. expected):
window36 0.00010225 BTC per GH/s (151.5%)
window37 0.00003583 BTC per GH/s (53.2%)
window38 0.00016487 BTC per GH/s (246.7%)
window39 0.00008761 BTC per GH/s (131.2%)

okimzti
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 24, 2015, 11:11:43 AM
 #3092

Love the coins.  Thanks for everything NF!
plasticAiredale
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 24, 2015, 06:14:54 PM
 #3093

What is Nasty Mining's stance on the whole XT versus Core debate?

Will it continue to mine under Core?

Will it switch if XT reaches its 75% threshold?

Will moving to XT be a poll option, or is this ultimately an OgNasty decision?

I really don't want to bring the nastiness (no pun intended) of the overall core vs XT debate to this thread, but was wondering what the plan if any is at the moment.
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1261


Quoth the Raven "Nevermore."


View Profile WWW
August 24, 2015, 06:54:13 PM
 #3094

What is Nasty Mining's stance on the whole XT versus Core debate?

XT is not something I could be passionate about.  The block size debate will not be solved with an altcoin.  I am for increasing the block size to 8mb when it is appropriate to do so.


Will it continue to mine under Core?

My desire is to continue supporting NastyPool, which I hope will be mining "under Core."


Will it switch if XT reaches its 75% threshold?

I don't believe this will happen.


Will moving to XT be a poll option, or is this ultimately an OgNasty decision?

I am always curious about the opinion of NastyFans.  This could be a fun poll to have now.  Maybe 2 polls to gauge support (Core vs XT & 1mb vs 8mb).


I really don't want to bring the nastiness (no pun intended) of the overall core vs XT debate to this thread, but was wondering what the plan if any is at the moment.

My plan is to continue encouraging and participating in the Bitcoin world.  I don't think the Bitcoin block size debate should be viewed as core vs XT.

          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
.
|
.
|
          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
unthy
nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 593
Merit: 542



View Profile
August 24, 2015, 09:46:21 PM
 #3095

Will it continue to mine under Core?
My desire is to continue supporting NastyPool, which I hope will be mining "under Core."

Although I am not a fan of many Bitcoin Core developers and their decisions NastyPool will continue to mine using software that is protocol compatible to Bitcoin Core.

Will moving to XT be a poll option, or is this ultimately an OgNasty decision?
I am always curious about the opinion of NastyFans.  This could be a fun poll to have now.  Maybe 2 polls to gauge support (Core vs XT & 1mb vs 8mb).

I do not understand the point of 1MB vs. 8MB. Or should we start our own fork called NastyBitcoin with 8MB blocks?

I can do a opinion poll for Core vs. XT.

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1261


Quoth the Raven "Nevermore."


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2015, 01:34:06 AM
 #3096

I do not understand the point of 1MB vs. 8MB. Or should we start our own fork called NastyBitcoin with 8MB blocks?

There are many who feel the block size should be increased to 8mb that do not support XT.  They don't want XT's "features" and they don't want restrictive 1mb blocks that force us to depend on 3rd party payment networks in the future.  Core vs XT might as well be simplified as greed vs ego.  I think BlockStream & XT are both evil and it would be a shame if either was incorporated into Bitcoin.  While both teams would like you to believe it is a black and white scenario, as that gives each team hope to hijack the Bitcoin network, I think it is irresponsible to view things that way. 

In response to your rhetorical question, I would be disappointed by the creation of a Nastycoin through a Bitcoin fork.

          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
.
|
.
|
          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
unthy
TheAnalogKid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 25, 2015, 02:13:37 AM
 #3097

I do not understand the point of 1MB vs. 8MB. Or should we start our own fork called NastyBitcoin with 8MB blocks?

There are many who feel the block size should be increased to 8mb that do not support XT.  They don't want XT's "features" and they don't want restrictive 1mb blocks that force us to depend on 3rd party payment networks in the future.  Core vs XT might as well be simplified as greed vs ego.  I think BlockStream & XT are both evil and it would be a shame if either was incorporated into Bitcoin.  While both teams would like you to believe it is a black and white scenario, as that gives each team hope to hijack the Bitcoin network, I think it is irresponsible to view things that way. 

In response to your rhetorical question, I would be disappointed by the creation of a Nastycoin through a Bitcoin fork.
This being the case, I'd recommend adding Jeff's BIP100 proposal to your poll... Wink  (http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf)

So far I think this is the most sound proposal for block size increase I've seen.  Allows Core to dynamically expand - and more importantly, contract - allowing pools/miners to vote for adjusting the blocksize limits based on what they see with market pressure and existing backlog, as well as their own infrastructure capacities.  Pretty smart.  And, free of all other baggage.
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1261


Quoth the Raven "Nevermore."


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2015, 02:36:33 AM
 #3098

This being the case, I'd recommend adding Jeff's BIP100 proposal to your poll... Wink  (http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf)

So far I think this is the most sound proposal for block size increase I've seen.  Allows Core to dynamically expand - and more importantly, contract - allowing pools/miners to vote for adjusting the blocksize limits based on what they see with market pressure and existing backlog, as well as their own infrastructure capacities.  Pretty smart.  And, free of all other baggage.

Jeff has been the most reasonable of all developers if what I've read is to be believed.  I hope they can all agree on a proposal before the end of the year.  I think a little healthy animosity among developers is good for Bitcoin but they shouldn't set a precedent of taking their ball and going home every time an argument arises. 

The current situation strikes me as parents divorcing over disagreements on how to best raise the kids... 

          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
.
|
.
|
          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
unthy
nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 593
Merit: 542



View Profile
August 26, 2015, 01:37:37 AM
 #3099

I'd recommend adding Jeff's BIP100 proposal to your poll...

We need to clarify the reason for the poll(s). I assume the poll is about which Bitcoin path NastyPool should follow. This means the poll only lists real existing Bitcoin / Bitcoin-fork software that NastyPool should use for mining. This poll would be useful to help me see what nastyfans would like to see NastyPool do.

If the poll is just for fun to find out nastyfans positions on various aspects of Bitcoin blocksize debate then that would include quite different information and choices and would have no real implications to Nasty operations.

I think a little healthy animosity among developers is good for Bitcoin but they shouldn't set a precedent of taking their ball and going home every time an argument arises. 

The current situation strikes me as parents divorcing over disagreements on how to best raise the kids... 

This is the nature of open source. I commend Mike and Gavin for forking even if I do not agree with their changes. This is healthy for the advancement of crypto currencies. Anyone who has a problem with this does not understand how open source works. Anyone who is afraid of this should stay out of Bitcoin.

Player 8
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 27, 2015, 04:20:01 AM
 #3100

Hey first time post.

I just sold my nasty shares and the payment is on hold, how long will this take or do I have to do something in order to receive my BTC
Pages: « 1 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 [155] 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!