Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 02:17:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Why you should be against free education.  (Read 1805 times)
steelhouse (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 717
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 25, 2014, 11:40:35 PM
 #21

Quote
Basically he is saying he wants to sell off the national forests, blm land, and sell everything to private land owners at high bid. 

Obviously there wouldn't be national parks in a Libertarian system that isn't to say though that people couldn't buy up their own land and let the public use it I don't know where you got that shit from his interview because he just said you could go to court if some company or person is polluting your land it's really amazing seeing Americans try and think about a different viewpoint to theirs because you really do just make shit up and choose to live in your own alternate reality, not wonder nobody halfway decent gets elected as president in your country.

Just consider all the public land, private land that was bought up and set aside by the people for public use.  Thus the national parks are already private land.
Lethn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
November 26, 2014, 10:47:29 AM
 #22

Stop making shit up, seriously, just remembered next year's supposed to be election season isn't it? So no wonder Americans are acting more stupid than usual.
reyhiesa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 07, 2014, 05:11:29 PM
 #23

Quote
Basically he is saying he wants to sell off the national forests, blm land, and sell everything to private land owners at high bid. 

Obviously there wouldn't be national parks in a Libertarian system that isn't to say though that people couldn't buy up their own land and let the public use it I don't know where you got that shit from his interview because he just said you could go to court if some company or person is polluting your land it's really amazing seeing Americans try and think about a different viewpoint to theirs because you really do just make shit up and choose to live in your own alternate reality, not wonder nobody halfway decent gets elected as president in your country.

I think he is right about the example of pollution he gave. You're assuming it's straight forward to determine if the land or air was polluted by a company or person, but I don't think that is necessarily the case. As he said, you have for example a company some distance away that is emitting pollutants that are known to be harmful. How do you prove that your recently developed cancer is related to it? Isn't it easier to make sure those pollutants aren't emitted, or are at least treated first? Or for example, how do you deal with those that contribute to climate change, or any other externalities?

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
█████              █
█████     ███       ███
█████     ████      ████
█████     █████     █████
█████     █████     █████
█████     █████     █████
█████     █████     █████
█████     █████     █████
█████     █████     █████
█████     █████     █████
█████     ████████████████████
█████     ████████████████████
 ██████           ██████
   █████▄       ▄█████
     ███████████████
        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
Start 1st ICO : SEPT 27 - 60 DAYS
▬▬▬ JOIN NOW ! ▬▬▬
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

      ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▄████████████████████▄
   ████████████████████████
  ▐█████████████▀▀▀▀▀██████▌
  ▐████████████      ██████▌
  ▐███████████▌   ▄▄▄██████▌
  ▐███████████    █████████▌
  ▐████████▀▀▀    ▀▀▀██████▌
  ▐████████          ██████▌
  ▐███████████    █████████▌
   ███████████    █████████
    ▀█████████    ███████▀
      ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀    ▀▀▀▀▀▀
clubsofsteel
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 07, 2014, 07:22:28 PM
 #24

oddly this makes very much sense!
nicely done mate!

exoton
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 03:11:28 AM
 #25

Hitler was not actually a war hero. His superiors during World War 1 actually gave him mediocre ratings and he did not receive leadership promotions that almost everyone in the German Army received who fought in he war.

His rise to leadership was the result of extremely poor economic conditions that were caused by the crushing debt that was put on by the US, Britain and France after World War 1. The world learned a very hard lesson that it is not good to burden a country you beat in war with massive "war" debt
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!