Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 09:49:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: What if a large number of miners were suddenly forced to shut down?  (Read 6184 times)
pandalion98 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 10:47:00 AM
 #1

95% of miners are suddenly offline.
Be it a new law or an EMP strike. What would happen to bitcoin?  Huh
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
AnonBitCoiner
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 326


Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 10:53:05 AM
 #2

Value would increase? With a sudden cap on "incoming" currency, I think the economic value would substantially increase.



 

 

 

 

 

 


▄▄████████▄▄
▄▄████████████████▄▄
▄██
████████████████████▄
▄███
██████████████████████▄
▄████
███████████████████████▄
███████████████████████▄
█████████████████▄███████
████████████████▄███████▀
██████████▄▄███▄██████▀
████████▄████▄█████▀▀
██████▄██████████▀
███▄▄█████
███████▄
██▄██████████████
░▄██████████████▀
▄█████████████▀
████████████
███████████▀
███████▀▀
Mars,           
here we come!
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄██████████
███████████
▄███████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█
██████████████████████▀
▀██
███████████████████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀█████████
██████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
ElonCoin.org.
████████▄▄███████▄▄
███████▄████████████▌
██████▐██▀███████▀▀██
███████████████████▐█▌
████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄
███▐███▀▄█▄█▀▀█▄█▄▀
███████████████████
█████████████▄████
█████████▀░▄▄▄▄▄
███████▄█▄░▀█▄▄░▀
███▄██▄▀███▄█████▄▀
▄██████▄▀███████▀
████████▄▀████▀
█████▄▄
.
"I could either watch it
happen or be a part of it"

▬▬▬▬▬
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499


No I dont escrow anymore.


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 11:01:08 AM
 #3

95% of miners are suddenly offline.
Be it a new law or an EMP strike. What would happen to bitcoin?  Huh

Confirmation of transactions would take longer untill we hit the next difficulty adjustment. After that difficulty would be decreased. I am not 100% certain if there is a maximum the difficulty can change per adjustment, but I suspect there is.

Im not really here, its just your imagination.
turvarya
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 11:01:27 AM
 #4

Value would increase? With a sudden cap on "incoming" currency, I think the economic value would substantially increase.
I don't think so, since it would be bad PR for Bitcoins. Transaction would take longer to confirm, which would really hurt.
But the difficulty is adjusted every two weeks, so the effect on the network would be gone after that period, but still bad PR.

https://forum.bitcoin.com/
New censorship-free forum by Roger Ver. Try it out.
BitcoinExchangeIndia.com
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311
Merit: 264


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 11:05:50 AM
 #5

95% of miners are suddenly offline.
Be it a new law or an EMP strike. What would happen to bitcoin?  Huh

Some are already down IMO. Hence difficulty is going to drop Grin

TheNinja
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 11:12:44 AM
 #6

Value would increase? With a sudden cap on "incoming" currency, I think the economic value would substantially increase.
I don't think so, since it would be bad PR for Bitcoins. Transaction would take longer to confirm, which would really hurt.
But the difficulty is adjusted every two weeks, so the effect on the network would be gone after that period, but still bad PR.

I'm still a somewhat novice to the whole process, but do transaction confirmations require miner interaction?

shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499


No I dont escrow anymore.


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 11:20:59 AM
 #7

-snip-
I'm still a somewhat novice to the whole process, but do transaction confirmations require miner interaction?

Yes, you broadcast your transaction (TX) to all nodes you are connected to. These check if your TX is valid and safe them in memory, if they also meet the relay criteria they are broadcasted to all other nodes they know. This will - for regular transactions - result in the whole network knowing about your TX in a few seconds. The miners are those that take these TX and put them into a block. Once your TX is in a block it has its first confirmation. Each block after the first will increase the number of confirmations by 1.

The picture shows the number of TX my node knowns about. If they suddently drop a block was found and confirmed those you no longer see on the graph.


Im not really here, its just your imagination.
Bullioncoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 11:28:08 AM
 #8

I am sure the prices will go straight up, as the sellers would decrease as well.
herzmeister
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007



View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 11:42:11 AM
 #9

We'd feel a great disturbance in the Blockchain, as if millions of miners suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced  Embarrassed

https://localbitcoins.com/?ch=80k | BTC: 1LJvmd1iLi199eY7EVKtNQRW3LqZi8ZmmB
FattyMcButterpants
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 27, 2014, 12:15:50 PM
 #10

Value would increase? With a sudden cap on "incoming" currency, I think the economic value would substantially increase.
I don't think so, since it would be bad PR for Bitcoins. Transaction would take longer to confirm, which would really hurt.
But the difficulty is adjusted every two weeks, so the effect on the network would be gone after that period, but still bad PR.
This is not true. The difficulty adjusts every 2016 blocks so that the previous 2016 blocks would have been mined in two weeks had the difficulty be what it was changed to. Assuming that 95% of the miners go offline exactly as the difficulty chances and ignoring variance, and assuming that no additional miners come online or go offline then it would take 40 weeks for the difficulty to adjust.

However the likely result of the miners going offline is that the TX fees would skyrocket which would entice other miners to go online as the EV of mining would increase.
pandalion98 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 12:51:30 PM
 #11

Value would increase? With a sudden cap on "incoming" currency, I think the economic value would substantially increase.
I don't think so, since it would be bad PR for Bitcoins. Transaction would take longer to confirm, which would really hurt.
But the difficulty is adjusted every two weeks, so the effect on the network would be gone after that period, but still bad PR.
This is not true. The difficulty adjusts every 2016 blocks so that the previous 2016 blocks would have been mined in two weeks had the difficulty be what it was changed to. Assuming that 95% of the miners go offline exactly as the difficulty chances and ignoring variance, and assuming that no additional miners come online or go offline then it would take 40 weeks for the difficulty to adjust.

However the likely result of the miners going offline is that the TX fees would skyrocket which would entice other miners to go online as the EV of mining would increase.
Does this mean confirmation will take about 3-4 hours?
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499


No I dont escrow anymore.


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 12:57:09 PM
 #12

Value would increase? With a sudden cap on "incoming" currency, I think the economic value would substantially increase.
I don't think so, since it would be bad PR for Bitcoins. Transaction would take longer to confirm, which would really hurt.
But the difficulty is adjusted every two weeks, so the effect on the network would be gone after that period, but still bad PR.
This is not true. The difficulty adjusts every 2016 blocks so that the previous 2016 blocks would have been mined in two weeks had the difficulty be what it was changed to. Assuming that 95% of the miners go offline exactly as the difficulty chances and ignoring variance, and assuming that no additional miners come online or go offline then it would take 40 weeks for the difficulty to adjust.

However the likely result of the miners going offline is that the TX fees would skyrocket which would entice other miners to go online as the EV of mining would increase.
Does this mean confirmation will take about 3-4 hours?

On average a confirmation would take 200 minutes, yes.

Im not really here, its just your imagination.
pandalion98 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 01:01:40 PM
 #13

Value would increase? With a sudden cap on "incoming" currency, I think the economic value would substantially increase.
I don't think so, since it would be bad PR for Bitcoins. Transaction would take longer to confirm, which would really hurt.
But the difficulty is adjusted every two weeks, so the effect on the network would be gone after that period, but still bad PR.
This is not true. The difficulty adjusts every 2016 blocks so that the previous 2016 blocks would have been mined in two weeks had the difficulty be what it was changed to. Assuming that 95% of the miners go offline exactly as the difficulty chances and ignoring variance, and assuming that no additional miners come online or go offline then it would take 40 weeks for the difficulty to adjust.

However the likely result of the miners going offline is that the TX fees would skyrocket which would entice other miners to go online as the EV of mining would increase.
Does this mean confirmation will take about 3-4 hours?

On average a confirmation would take 200 minutes, yes.

That'd be a hassle I guess. Zero-confirmation services would then explode, correct?
Flashman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Hodl!


View Profile
November 27, 2014, 01:02:52 PM
 #14

EMP only tends to affect "live" electronics seriously. Bearing in mind that there's probably a lot of 1st gen stuff and GPUs sitting around unplugged at the moment, many of those would probably come back online in event of a huge hashrate drop.

Also I think even a severe "carrington event" would only impact half the planet, even if it managed to zap US and China at the same time (midday over pacific) then Europe may escape severe effects, so I think the maximum that would get taken out is about 70%.... ~30 minute block confirms for a while.

TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6

Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
inBitweTrust
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 27, 2014, 01:12:30 PM
 #15

95% of miners are suddenly offline.
Be it a new law or an EMP strike. What would happen to bitcoin?  Huh


Most EMP strikes are trivial to defend against with a properly grounded Faraday cage. Many datacenters are protected against EMP's as well.

shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499


No I dont escrow anymore.


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 01:13:04 PM
 #16

-snip-

That'd be a hassle I guess. Zero-confirmation services would then explode, correct?

I suspect there would be more demand for offchain services but at the same time 51% attacks and other possible attacks would be easier, thus requiring for more initial confirmations to mitigate the effect.

IMHO the best action would be to reactivate old mininghardware and only spend btc if you absolutly have to. If I had to make or accept a TX, Id require more confirmations than now. Not sure about how many, probably over 10. A deal would take over a day under those conditions, even longer with escrow.

Im not really here, its just your imagination.
pandalion98 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 01:16:18 PM
 #17

EMP only tends to affect "live" electronics seriously. Bearing in mind that there's probably a lot of 1st gen stuff and GPUs sitting around unplugged at the moment, many of those would probably come back online in event of a huge hashrate drop.

Also I think even a severe "carrington event" would only impact half the planet, even if it managed to zap US and China at the same time (midday over pacific) then Europe may escape severe effects, so I think the maximum that would get taken out is about 70%.... ~30 minute block confirms for a while.
That is still a lot  Undecided
Velkro
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1014



View Profile
November 27, 2014, 01:17:16 PM
 #18

95% of miners are suddenly offline.
Be it a new law or an EMP strike. What would happen to bitcoin?  Huh
That is impossible to happen and even if it would, nothing impotant would happen Wink, new miners would rush for free money.
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499


No I dont escrow anymore.


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2014, 01:22:26 PM
 #19

95% of miners are suddenly offline.
Be it a new law or an EMP strike. What would happen to bitcoin?  Huh
That is impossible to happen and even if it would, nothing impotant would happen Wink, new miners would rush for free money.

So you are saying there is an equivalent of 95% of todays hashingpower somewhere in a warehouse just waiting for this to happen?

Im not really here, its just your imagination.
Velkro
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1014



View Profile
November 27, 2014, 01:31:48 PM
 #20



So you are saying there is an equivalent of 95% of todays hashingpower somewhere in a warehouse just waiting for this to happen?
Nope, im saying if mining would be 95% easier new miners would pop quicker than you can think of Smiley
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!