Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 01:36:49 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [BOUNTY] Open Source pooled mining platform with web interface  (Read 17148 times)
redditorrex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


Nom Nom Nom


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2011, 03:09:06 PM
 #81

You guys think your funny but that was the first thing i tried. Like i said the server dosent respond to even type in a password. Normally when you SSH youll aeast get a passwird box to type in to. Vnc is the same way the instant i press connect, it says disconnected. No waiting for connections or nothing i just get dropped. When i login to my KalyHosting my VPS server only shows up in the billing section. There's no way to reboot my server or options to re-install my linux version, and the "Choose Product" selection doesn't say anything, it just says "Choose Product" KalyHost really messed up and I hope they fix it soon.
You're saying the server doesn't even ping ?

Exactly, and I have a confirm online to verify that the server isn't responded. Just timedout

*Update: its been over 36+ hours, still no response from KalyHost and they claim they have 24/7 email support? WT-EFF?

*Update: well i mined 1BTC over the course of 2 days and leetnet.net has been very responsive and I believe my server is running, I'll post back when I have time to install peace mates.
(Still working on contacting KalyHost, thinking about call'em from their whois number almost 2 days)

Sidenote: LeetNet.net is really Burst.net, and have been having connection issues over the last week.

Reddit Mining Team - MtRed.com = Pure PPS + #00GH/s + LP(+) + AutoPay&InstaPay + Audio Notifications
Find us in #mtred @ irc.freenode.net
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481333809
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481333809

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481333809
Reply with quote  #2

1481333809
Report to moderator
1481333809
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481333809

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481333809
Reply with quote  #2

1481333809
Report to moderator
1481333809
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481333809

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481333809
Reply with quote  #2

1481333809
Report to moderator
Xenland
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man


View Profile
June 03, 2011, 03:56:31 AM
 #82

What kind of connection issues? Ive been expericing my miner dropping out every so often my self with leetnet, and kalyhost for the record still havent replied
Xenland
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man


View Profile
June 03, 2011, 05:09:09 AM
 #83

I think all I need is score support for reward payout and internationalization and I have fullfilled the bounty correct me if im wrong plz Smiley
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10617.msg152161#msg152161
SgtSpike
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344



View Profile
June 03, 2011, 05:51:21 AM
 #84

I think all I need is score support for reward payout and internationalization and I have fullfilled the bounty correct me if im wrong plz Smiley
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10617.msg152161#msg152161
I do not have time to test this release myself, but does anyone else want to verify/refute his software as fulfilling the bounty?
johanatan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
June 03, 2011, 06:55:06 AM
 #85

Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.

1GjRUzZfDCBHeCyJk6av3pXYS9VKjCvQTQ
Xenland
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man


View Profile
June 03, 2011, 08:47:51 AM
 #86

Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.

This is just my theory but If you had just even 10,000 miners over a whole bitcoin network evenly distributing 50BTC everyone would get 0.005 per ten minutes average. I don't think it would be much better for proportional maybe possibly 0.05 being optimistic. about .3 every hour 7.2 a day.

I will do that same for 1,000,000 (I don't know the actual miners but this might happen someday if it goes mainstream)

50BTC divided by 1,000,000 = 0.00005 every ten minutes
thats 0.0003 every hour
0.0072 everyday
0.216BTC every month

Conclusion there is no gain beyond this point, half the network stops mining but more then 1,000,000 million people are using bitcoins so it takes for ever for your transaction to go through

again just a theory somebody correct me im wrong or add and dooms day thoughts on the matter below......
davout
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


1davout


View Profile WWW
June 03, 2011, 04:01:11 PM
 #87

I do not have time to test this release myself, but does anyone else want to verify/refute his software as fulfilling the bounty?
I'd suggest to wait a little bit, I'll submit my contribution pretty soon

Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.
Go for it Smiley

error
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
June 03, 2011, 08:17:40 PM
 #88

I've gotten all my servers the hell out of Scranton and I suggest everyone else do the same.

15UFyv6kfWgq83Pp3yhXPr8rknv9m6581W
xf2_org
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 03, 2011, 09:23:31 PM
 #89

I've gotten all my servers the hell out of Scranton and I suggest everyone else do the same.

That's terribly disappointing.  Their VPS worked great for me, and I was thinking about getting a rack...

Xenland
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man


View Profile
June 03, 2011, 09:33:13 PM
 #90

I do not have time to test this release myself, but does anyone else want to verify/refute his software as fulfilling the bounty?
I'd suggest to wait a little bit, I'll submit my contribution pretty soon

Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.
Go for it Smiley

I agree due to the fact that there are many bugs in my v2.0 software and I'd like to see what he has to offer
error
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
June 03, 2011, 10:02:57 PM
 #91

I've gotten all my servers the hell out of Scranton and I suggest everyone else do the same.

That's terribly disappointing.  Their VPS worked great for me, and I was thinking about getting a rack...

The whole datacenter has had ongoing network issues for years, with no sign of improvement. Sad

15UFyv6kfWgq83Pp3yhXPr8rknv9m6581W
Xenland
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man


View Profile
June 05, 2011, 12:10:38 AM
 #92

My code was getting too hard to edit, add, & update features and fixes so I decided to rewrite it in OOP style programming for a better structure to build upon Check it out Cheesy
davout
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


1davout


View Profile WWW
June 05, 2011, 07:45:28 AM
 #93

Do yourself a favor, do the switch to rails Smiley

Xenland
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man


View Profile
June 05, 2011, 10:40:55 AM
 #94

LAWL, Do me a favour and prove to me that rails is more better... that's right I said it...


*On a serious note when do you think you'll be releasing a preview?
timmmay
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70



View Profile
June 05, 2011, 11:09:39 AM
 #95

^^ lol

davout
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


1davout


View Profile WWW
June 05, 2011, 12:49:05 PM
 #96

*On a serious note when do you think you'll be releasing a preview?
I'll release the fully functional app by tomorrow evening for a 24h test session against testnet and then it goes live.
The app is ready, I'm busy on heavy automated testing right now.

davout
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


1davout


View Profile WWW
June 05, 2011, 12:52:31 PM
 #97

LAWL, Do me a favour and prove to me that rails is more better...
Hopefully results will speak for themselves Smiley

Xenland
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man


View Profile
June 05, 2011, 06:49:32 PM
 #98

What is the point of an API for a pool system?
johanatan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
June 05, 2011, 08:44:09 PM
 #99

I do not have time to test this release myself, but does anyone else want to verify/refute his software as fulfilling the bounty?
I'd suggest to wait a little bit, I'll submit my contribution pretty soon

Why wasn't 'pooling' in concept implemented in the original bitcoin client?  Then, there'd be only one 'pool' and it'd be the entire network dishing out proportional rewards to nodes.  Seems pretty simple to me.
Go for it Smiley

Since the network is designed to pay 50 BTC to whomever solves a given block; we are stuck with the current collection of competing pools implementation.  Any change to this would require forking the blockchain and creating a new currency.

1GjRUzZfDCBHeCyJk6av3pXYS9VKjCvQTQ
davout
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


1davout


View Profile WWW
June 07, 2011, 12:09:06 AM
 #100

Hey all,

have a poke at http://pool.bitcoin-central.net/

Comments and megahashes welcome

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!