|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
bitkilo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1010
https://www.bitcoin.com/
|
|
December 10, 2014, 03:22:19 AM |
|
|
Not a paid signature, just added to promote Bitcoin.com
|
|
|
Omikifuse
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1009
|
|
December 10, 2014, 03:23:43 AM |
|
Why someone with such giant amount to move put no tax in the transaction It kinda of makes no sense
|
|
|
|
|
thefunkybits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2014, 06:07:04 AM |
|
$200,000 transactions aren't too uncommon to see on the blockchain
It's the multi-million dollar ones that get me excited!
|
|
|
|
bitkilo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1010
https://www.bitcoin.com/
|
|
December 10, 2014, 06:10:10 AM |
|
$200,000 transactions aren't too uncommon to see on the blockchain
It's the multi-million dollar ones that get me excited!
Your right, I see that now. Maybe i should have started off with my 3rd post, the 91 million dollar transaction.
|
Not a paid signature, just added to promote Bitcoin.com
|
|
|
gablay12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 918
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2014, 06:51:21 AM |
|
91.000.000 USD.Good figure.
|
The more I meet people, the more I like my dog.
|
|
|
lihuajkl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2014, 07:45:36 AM |
|
The guys don't even want to spare one penny to reward the miner who included his huge transaction to the mined block. Any one can take advantage of this free network.
|
|
|
|
trishs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2014, 09:22:24 AM |
|
It is one of the largest transactions in bitcoin's history, by far the largest under bitcoin's recent high prices, and represents 1.6% of all bitcoins now in circulation.
|
|
|
|
BitmoreCoin
|
|
December 10, 2014, 11:56:11 AM |
|
Why someone with such giant amount to move put no tax in the transaction It kinda of makes no sense We only pay tax if we have to.
|
|
|
|
botany
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
|
|
December 11, 2014, 03:46:07 AM |
|
Why someone with such giant amount to move put no tax in the transaction It kinda of makes no sense There is a difference between transaction fee and tax. Taxes are charged only by the government, not bitcoin miners.
|
|
|
|
1Referee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
|
|
December 11, 2014, 01:14:30 PM |
|
Why someone with such giant amount to move put no tax in the transaction It kinda of makes no sense There is a difference between transaction fee and tax. Taxes are charged only by the government, not bitcoin miners. I'm sure he meant fee and not tax. Mostly these huge transactions have enough priority to be sent without fee. But I agree, supporting the network with only 0.0001 fee won't make them lose a lot
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
December 11, 2014, 02:56:30 PM |
|
Those large transaction are probably webmasters or pool operators who use cold storage.
|
|
|
|
teukon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 11, 2014, 08:24:12 PM |
|
But I agree, supporting the network with only 0.0001 fee won't make them lose a lot True, but the 100-mike (0.0001-BTC) fee will also not support the network much, nor does it cost the miner much to include the transaction. These "huge" transactions don't take up any more resources than simple transactions of far smaller amounts. The lion's share of the costs are borne by the sender in the form of risk as they may send to the wrong address or reveal sensitive information while creating/signing/broadcasting the transaction.
|
|
|
|
1Referee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
|
|
December 12, 2014, 12:59:04 AM |
|
But I agree, supporting the network with only 0.0001 fee won't make them lose a lot True, but the 100-mike (0.0001-BTC) fee will also not support the network much, nor does it cost the miner much to include the transaction. These "huge" transactions don't take up any more resources than simple transactions of far smaller amounts. The lion's share of the costs are borne by the sender in the form of risk as they may send to the wrong address or reveal sensitive information while creating/signing/broadcasting the transaction. Just one 0.0001 fee won't do much, that's right. If a block contains 1000+ transactions, the fees can add up and form a decent amount. For example, block 333920 has 1071 transactions. Total generated fee amount is 0.17766577 BTC
|
|
|
|
|