THOSE BAY FAQs...

[Isokoira]

Funny, always thought it was Satoshi.  LOL

[Isokoira]

Nice edit there, shatoshi to satoshi.  Good one RiverBoat

[RiverBoatBTC]

Nice edit there, shatoshi to satoshi.  Good one RiverBoat

que?

[Isokoira]

LOL

[youngmike]

fact is Bob shitting on noobs again and nobody cares  Life goes on!

[RiverBoatBTC]

One of his group posted in there thread last night about how they were shitting on bitbay, and the deleted it really quick lol

[Oops]

I believe I have answered that question many times to you and others: It's called BTC. I deeply recommend it.

Don't be fooled by I.E's main pet shill. His coin is Bytecent. Iconics shit coin. Even this IE boot licker almost couldn't stomach the scam that coin is. LOL

[barabbas]

Zimbeck on the censored thread:

"Ok so with a lot of thinking, I realize that following the dev schedule and doing markets is the wisest choice because it is low hanging fruit. It doesnt make sense to shift gears. An earlier comment said that funds will circulate before the peg and even if the price goes lower, true investors will stay in the coin.

I'm still going to draft up what i need to peg, start to identify what parts of the c++ source need to be changed and so forth.

Regardless, the immediate goal of getting markets is the road map for the coin, it gives the coin more impact etc.

There was mixed community reactions to the drop in price and the comments were about 50/50 which makes me see its best to fulfill the immediate foreseeable goals."

Translation:

Although all those guys on the other thread, the one where there's free speech and no censorship, got the scam right. Although I now know all the particulars of the scam. Although I have claim (and some actually believe me), that I am doing this "for the (true) investors" -amazingly gullible people, unbelievable-, I simply refuse to tell the truth in the open and will keep the farce going while Bobsurplus makes his thousands of BTC in this scam AND the "chinese", the one that is like a child in a candy store, because those are, both of them, as well as me, the ONLY one benefitting from this obvious and pathetic scam that I am going to keep alive because, you know, I am not going to renounce to the last 900BTC coming from BTER for my child on a candy store, my new pet. Those imbecilic "true investors", still in the coin, deserve indeed to lose eve single penny... and still will be a cheap lesson for them.... so that makes my decision and my actions "honorable... doesn't it? I'll let quarsxhz and drigitidical post to reassure me because those guys are3 sure going to stay until the very end and I will always claim I did it for them. To protect them.

And hey, I have to eat too, so the candy store boy better put up and compensate me for keeping his particular house of cards (barely) standing.

This is a very pathetic move by a very pathetic individual worth only disdain and contempt. Worthless individual that is writing not code but one of the most abject episodes ion the checkered history of alts. I don't want to be nearly as virulent as his despicable actions would demand but this guys is an ever worst piece of shit individual than Bobsurplus. At least this one has the guts to say he only wants to make money, no matter how; This little, pathetic Zimbeck not only won't admit to it but would pretend to the very end that he is doing the terrible things he is doing, allowing them to happen knowing fully well they have been happening since the beginning, "to protect the true investors".

A pile of shit, raw, smoking, unadulterated one is what Zimbeck's name will be associated from now on. Here's to Zimbeck, the Turd!

[dzimbeck]

Zimbeck on the censored thread:

"Ok so with a lot of thinking, I realize that following the dev schedule and doing markets is the wisest choice because it is low hanging fruit. It doesnt make sense to shift gears. An earlier comment said that funds will circulate before the peg and even if the price goes lower, true investors will stay in the coin.

I'm still going to draft up what i need to peg, start to identify what parts of the c++ source need to be changed and so forth.

Regardless, the immediate goal of getting markets is the road map for the coin, it gives the coin more impact etc.

There was mixed community reactions to the drop in price and the comments were about 50/50 which makes me see its best to fulfill the immediate foreseeable goals."

Translation:

Although all those guys on the other thread, the one where there's free speech and no censorship, got the scam right. Although I now know all the particulars of the scam. Although I have claim (and some actually believe me), that I am doing this "for the (true) investors" -amazingly gullible people, unbelievable-, I simply refuse to tell the truth in the open and will keep the farce going while Bobsurplus makes his thousands of BTC in this scam AND the "chinese", the one that is like a child in a candy store, because those are, both of them, as well as me, the ONLY one benefitting from this obvious and pathetic scam that I am going to keep alive because, you know, I am not going to renounce to the last 900BTC coming from BTER for my child on a candy store, my new pet. Those imbecilic "true investors", still in the coin, deserve indeed to lose eve single penny... and still will be a cheap lesson for them.... so that makes my decision and my actions "honorable... doesn't it? I'll let quarsxhz and drigitidical post to reassure me because those guys are3 sure going to stay until the very end and I will always claim I did it for them. To protect them.

And hey, I have to eat too, so the candy store boy better put up and compensate me for keeping his particular house of cards (barely) standing.

This is a very pathetic move by a very pathetic individual worth only disdain and contempt. Worthless individual that is writing not code but one of the most abject episodes ion the checkered history of alts. I don't want to be nearly as virulent as his despicable actions would demand but this guys is an ever worst piece of shit individual than Bobsurplus. At least this one has the guts to say he only wants to make money, no matter how; This little, pathetic Zimbeck not only won't admit to it but would pretend to the very end that he is doing the terrible things he is doing, allowing them to happen knowing fully well they have been happening since the beginning, "to protect the true investors".

A pile of shit, raw, smoking, unadulterated one is what Zimbeck's name will be associated from now on. Here's to Zimbeck, the Turd!

...and you should really look up the word "class" in the dictionary. I wasnt protecting Bob. Boy do you look like a schmuck right now.

[barabbas]

Welcome to your new life, Zimbeck the Turd! Have you heard from Pavel yet?

[dzimbeck]

Welcome to your new life, Zimbeck the Turd! Have you heard from Pavel yet?

Acception coins to do a project is not illegal. But defamation and cyberbullying is.

Im not at all concerned with whatever you decide to say or do. Behind the keyboard is a barrabas.

[dzimbeck]

[11/3/2014 6:14:44 PM] crypto.gekko: a coin is just a coin without a good developer.
[11/3/2014 6:14:52 PM] David Zimbeck: not at all good for my reputation
[11/3/2014 6:15:24 PM] crypto.gekko: This is what an investor is banking his money on. Your skills.
[11/3/2014 6:15:36 PM] David Zimbeck: yeah but somebody else profits
[11/3/2014 6:15:37 PM] crypto.gekko: Otherwise it's best to pay you for the work only.
[11/3/2014 6:15:39 PM] David Zimbeck: by using my name
[11/3/2014 6:15:51 PM] crypto.gekko: you are not the only one behind the coin.
[11/3/2014 6:16:04 PM] crypto.gekko: There will be an entire team behind you.
[11/3/2014 6:16:22 PM] David Zimbeck: yeah but that doesnt matter in the ICO phase
[11/3/2014 6:16:33 PM] crypto.gekko: That doesn't make sense to me
[11/3/2014 6:16:34 PM] David Zimbeck: you guys can just make a lot of BTC off the hype
[11/3/2014 6:16:48 PM] crypto.gekko: we could, sure. but that's not what this is about
[11/3/2014 6:16:53 PM] David Zimbeck: yes it is
[11/3/2014 6:17:00 PM] crypto.gekko: im sorry to hear that
[11/3/2014 6:17:19 PM] David Zimbeck: my name was used in the past by another coin
[11/3/2014 6:17:33 PM] David Zimbeck: and it was just to profit off my name
[11/3/2014 6:17:43 PM] crypto.gekko: The goal is bring this coin into the top 10 marketcap. We have the money and connections to do that.
[11/3/2014 6:17:49 PM] David Zimbeck: those kind of things are bad for me if I ever decide to start my own coin
[11/3/2014 6:18:06 PM] crypto.gekko: I would personally like this to be your coin.
[11/3/2014 6:18:52 PM] David Zimbeck: ok so i can attach my name to the coin if i get the btc up front
[11/3/2014 6:19:19 PM] crypto.gekko: Surely. And I'm willing to work with you in any way to make you happy.
[11/3/2014 6:19:25 PM] David Zimbeck: ok
[11/3/2014 6:20:13 PM] crypto.gekko: 30k is a lot of money, but I know your tech and support is worth every penny. Working together, the development is real and the money is real too.
[11/3/2014 6:20:26 PM] David Zimbeck: i believe my tech is worth a lot more
[11/3/2014 6:20:36 PM] David Zimbeck: i have turned down 30K before
[11/3/2014 6:21:03 PM] crypto.gekko: That's why our continued relationship would only bring more rewards.
[11/3/2014 6:21:07 PM] David Zimbeck: yeah
[11/3/2014 6:21:11 PM] David Zimbeck: thats the point
[11/3/2014 6:21:16 PM] David Zimbeck: im loyal everyone knows that
[11/3/2014 6:21:34 PM] crypto.gekko: The coin will have a large development pool. As you spend time to develop into the future, that money goes to you of course.
[11/3/2014 6:21:36 PM] David Zimbeck: you get more than you pay for
[11/3/2014 6:21:45 PM] David Zimbeck: since i can help your entire team
[11/3/2014 6:21:57 PM] crypto.gekko: indeed
[11/3/2014 6:22:21 PM] crypto.gekko: So what is the best way to move forward in your opinion?
[11/3/2014 6:22:45 PM] David Zimbeck: that all depends on you guys
[11/3/2014 6:22:57 PM] David Zimbeck: you know your schedule
[11/3/2014 6:23:14 PM] David Zimbeck: I can give you guys an address
[11/3/2014 6:24:09 PM] crypto.gekko: If you have trust in Lin and Steve and you are truly interested in making BitBay your "baby". I see no reason why you sholdnt take the bull by the horns.
[11/3/2014 6:24:36 PM] crypto.gekko: Otherwise, I will need to hire multiple devs and pay them as needed. You being one of them for your technology.
[11/3/2014 6:25:00 PM] David Zimbeck: I'm already doing that
[11/3/2014 6:25:13 PM] David Zimbeck: I work on Halo every day
[11/3/2014 6:25:33 PM] crypto.gekko: I think I have a better grip on the situation now.
[11/3/2014 6:26:04 PM] David Zimbeck: Basically when I wake up, I code. Then eat and sleep.
[11/3/2014 6:26:07 PM] David Zimbeck: lmao
[11/3/2014 6:26:27 PM] David Zimbeck: i also am training devs here in cambodia
[11/3/2014 6:26:28 PM] crypto.gekko: I do the same, but basically help other coins to make their tech a reality.
[11/3/2014 6:26:36 PM] David Zimbeck: i can train any of Lin or Steves devs
[11/3/2014 6:27:04 PM] crypto.gekko: Is the cost of that included in your initial payment?
[11/3/2014 6:27:20 PM] David Zimbeck: depends on what they ask me
[11/3/2014 6:27:31 PM] crypto.gekko: So we will need to create a contract.
[11/3/2014 6:27:45 PM] David Zimbeck: A real contract on paper?
[11/3/2014 6:27:59 PM] crypto.gekko: Digital contract or smartcontract if needed.
[11/3/2014 6:28:21 PM] crypto.gekko: The details of which I will discuss when I meet with Steve and Lin in China next week.
[11/3/2014 6:28:53 PM] David Zimbeck: Just draft a contract on paper
[11/3/2014 6:29:07 PM] crypto.gekko: Sure, I'm fine with a simple record of notary.
[11/3/2014 6:29:18 PM] David Zimbeck: most important, i dont want my name attached to the project until the btc funds
[11/3/2014 6:29:30 PM] David Zimbeck: once it funds you can use my name
[11/3/2014 6:29:38 PM] crypto.gekko: that seems more a matter of trust to me
[11/3/2014 6:29:40 PM] David Zimbeck: i just wanted to make sure my name is not used for profit
[11/3/2014 6:30:03 PM] David Zimbeck: because it could harm my reputation otherwise

[dzimbeck]

Barrabas, i didnt find out until it was too late. And are being a real asshole. Ive got lots of logs to prove they promised the moon and i was very cautious.

[youngmike]

qawzsx is bob 

[youngmike]

[youngmike]

[djm34]

[11/3/2014 6:29:40 PM] David Zimbeck: i just wanted to make sure my name is not used for profit

so... you thought they gave 100btc for what exactly ?

[sdersdf3]

[11/3/2014 6:29:40 PM] David Zimbeck: i just wanted to make sure my name is not used for profit

so... you thought they gave 100btc for what exactly ?

Only 100BTC? Zimbeck, I hope you think the loss of your reputation was worth more than 100BTC.

That's just $33k at current - falling - prices.

[dzimbeck]

[11/3/2014 6:29:40 PM] David Zimbeck: i just wanted to make sure my name is not used for profit

so... you thought they gave 100btc for what exactly ?

Only 100BTC? Zimbeck, I hope you think the loss of your reputation was worth more than 100BTC.

That's just $33k at current - falling - prices.

Oh my reputation is 100% intact. I got my inbox flooded with supportive emails.

Regardless, you are right it was worth a lot more than that there is absolutely no price on it.

[sdersdf3]

[11/3/2014 6:29:40 PM] David Zimbeck: i just wanted to make sure my name is not used for profit

so... you thought they gave 100btc for what exactly ?

Only 100BTC? Zimbeck, I hope you think the loss of your reputation was worth more than 100BTC.

That's just $33k at current - falling - prices.

Oh my reputation is 100% intact. I got my inbox flooded with supportive emails.

Regardless, you are right it was worth a lot more than that there is absolutely no price on it.

Well, this Bitbay situation is the first I'd ever heard of you and I have to say - it's a pretty bad first impression. You've tainted yourself with this at the very least. 100BTC is not worth a future career/brand in crypto.