Bitcoin Forum
April 18, 2024, 10:16:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Pics of Huge Hosting Mine Under Construction, (Dec 2015 Update: We've moved)  (Read 54112 times)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4102
Merit: 7710


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2014, 03:10:13 AM
 #21

so 5 kwatt = 425 a month correct?

I am spending about 500 a month in house during the winter months to run 5 kwatts at home.

If i sent a pm could you quote rates for 20 30 and 40 kwatts?


▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
ASICSPACE (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Feel free to contact me via email, skype or phone!


View Profile WWW
December 08, 2014, 03:34:23 AM
 #22

so 5 kwatt = 425 a month correct?

I am spending about 500 a month in house during the winter months to run 5 kwatts at home.

If i sent a pm could you quote rates for 20 30 and 40 kwatts?



Our prices depend on how far into the future you'd like to pay in advance, as well as your volume. Send me a PM.

★★★★ Bitcoin Miner Hosting! ★★★★ $55/kw-month ★★★★ http://www.asicspace.com/ ★★ Best Prices in the hosting Industry! ★★★★
K210
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 507


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 05:18:58 AM
 #23

great more difficulty increases, say goodbye to stable difficulty
avw1982
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 08, 2014, 08:24:45 AM
 #24

great more difficulty increases, say goodbye to stable difficulty

LOL  Grin
bitcoinmining
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 08, 2014, 08:40:16 AM
 #25

Pictures are great, it's good to see people are still investing on mining business. I'm waiting for it on January, I think about buying some KWs...
ASICSPACE (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Feel free to contact me via email, skype or phone!


View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 03:51:56 AM
 #26

New Pic Up:



We power washed the shelves today. Time to put in circuits!

★★★★ Bitcoin Miner Hosting! ★★★★ $55/kw-month ★★★★ http://www.asicspace.com/ ★★ Best Prices in the hosting Industry! ★★★★
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 08:22:31 AM
 #27

Take some pictures of the Cooling planned.  Grin

What type of fire detection tech will be used? { 24/7 monitoring }

Are you using LED's in the lights? {Extra heat, if not}

This really looks awesome..... Would be great to have "Cloud mining" backed by real infrastructure and mining. {None of this Ponzi nonsense doing the rounds}

Thanks for backing Crypto Currency !!  Grin

Edit : Only now seeing, you not going the "Cloud mining" way.. Only hosting hardware.

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
bitcoinmining
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 09, 2014, 08:51:48 AM
 #28

Edit : Only now seeing, you not going the "Cloud mining" way.. Only hosting hardware.

I hope they won't go that way, Cloud mining business didn't give much trust to people like me recently...
cloverme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1054


SpacePirate.io


View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 03:15:04 PM
 #29

They have a website:
asicspace.com
price $80-95/kw/month with more undisclosed discount for >30kw customers.

Not as a criticism, but I don't get it why all WA hosting has the same price: roughly $85-100/kw/mo when their cost in electricity (2c/kwh) is just 16-20% of cost of electricity in US on average (12c/kwh). Their electricity cost is just $15-20/kw/mo vs $88 average in US.
Do they have some kind of a union there that prevents going lower?

Yeah, I don't know why that is either.... WA is supposed to have dirt cheap power.  The pricing offered here wouldn't work out for my needs. Just some back of napkin math... Say, I take 1 antminer s4... that's 1.4kw for ~$120 a month for power, it's only going make roughly $138 a month, leaving less than $20 on the table. :/
thefunkybits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 11:41:16 PM
 #30

Wowzerz

Which mining company is powering the farm??
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 10, 2014, 12:32:40 AM
Last edit: December 10, 2014, 01:11:47 AM by Endlessa
 #31

No raised flooring? cold air from above?  

Do vents all line the exterior walls?  Just judging from the garage door, is the cold air entering from ~15-20 ft.?

are you doing hot aisle/cold aisle?

Was this building custom built?

or re-purposed with warehouse racks?

The high ceiling are nice, assuming the cooling intake is all the way up on the ceiling.

We are doing hot/cold aisle. Our engineers assure us the high ceilings and concrete will do a lot of the work dissapating the heat for us.

so I assume then the venting on the side is an attempt to use force airflow for cooling.  Each pass over a hot aisle will dilute the cooling to the center most rows.  In essence you'll be fighting thermal dynamics and having to over cool (and waste much more energy) attempting to reduce hot spots in the center.  Higher hardware failures and reduced performance (some hardware will under-clock itself to reduce temp) in the center of the center aisle (or other areas, depending on how the forced flow venting is positioned).  While concrete does have decent thermal conductivity, unless the air you are pumping is warmer than the external temperature, it will actually warm the air coming from the wall adjacent venting (see 4th photo on your initial post). Essentially your venting will be cooling the wall first, then the equipment. Furthermore, the first hot aisle will create thermal turbulence in cooling airflow, thus giving inconsistent results to your cooling attempts.  This is why most data centers have moved toward something like what's in this simple image:



now I'm not trying to troll or dig on you, more so trying to give potential improvements, but this would be an issue better dealt with prior to having hardware on the racks which will only create migration complexity in the future.  The user experience to watch out for, if this is the going forward scenario, is constant complaints of "I have 4 identical units with 1 (located in a possible hot spot) that consistently under performs."

Also, another consideration, when in a heterogeneous hardware situation (I assume you'll be hosting many different brands) and user controlled overclocking your thermal zones will be in constant flux.  I just feel concern that this will create the dreaded whack-a-hot-spot situation many early data centers  experienced.  Without a view of your actual cooling plan, I can only go by what I see in the photo.

Take some pictures of the Cooling planned.  Grin

I too would love to see these.

Edit: Great resource if your looking to leverage some free advise  http://hightech.lbl.gov/datacenters.html
ASICSPACE (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Feel free to contact me via email, skype or phone!


View Profile WWW
December 10, 2014, 04:16:14 AM
Last edit: December 10, 2014, 11:52:03 PM by ASICSPACE
 #32

No raised flooring? cold air from above?  

Do vents all line the exterior walls?  Just judging from the garage door, is the cold air entering from ~15-20 ft.?

are you doing hot aisle/cold aisle?

Was this building custom built?

or re-purposed with warehouse racks?

The high ceiling are nice, assuming the cooling intake is all the way up on the ceiling.

We are doing hot/cold aisle. Our engineers assure us the high ceilings and concrete will do a lot of the work dissapating the heat for us.

so I assume then the venting on the side is an attempt to use force airflow for cooling.  Each pass over a hot aisle will dilute the cooling to the center most rows.  In essence you'll be fighting thermal dynamics and having to over cool (and waste much more energy) attempting to reduce hot spots in the center.  Higher hardware failures and reduced performance (some hardware will under-clock itself to reduce temp) in the center of the center aisle (or other areas, depending on how the forced flow venting is positioned).  While concrete does have decent thermal conductivity, unless the air you are pumping is warmer than the external temperature, it will actually warm the air coming from the wall adjacent venting (see 4th photo on your initial post). Essentially your venting will be cooling the wall first, then the equipment. Furthermore, the first hot aisle will create thermal turbulence in cooling airflow, thus giving inconsistent results to your cooling attempts.  This is why most data centers have moved toward something like what's in this simple image:



now I'm not trying to troll or dig on you, more so trying to give potential improvements, but this would be an issue better dealt with prior to having hardware on the racks which will only create migration complexity in the future.  The user experience to watch out for, if this is the going forward scenario, is constant complaints of "I have 4 identical units with 1 (located in a possible hot spot) that consistently under performs."

Also, another consideration, when in a heterogeneous hardware situation (I assume you'll be hosting many different brands) and user controlled overclocking your thermal zones will be in constant flux.  I just feel concern that this will create the dreaded whack-a-hot-spot situation many early data centers  experienced.  Without a view of your actual cooling plan, I can only go by what I see in the photo.

Take some pictures of the Cooling planned.  Grin

I too would love to see these.

Edit: Great resource if your looking to leverage some free advise  http://hightech.lbl.gov/datacenters.html

Wow I'm surprised, you have nailed some of the issues our engineers were scratching their heads over. We have a solution, wait until cooling is fully built and I'll post some pics.

★★★★ Bitcoin Miner Hosting! ★★★★ $55/kw-month ★★★★ http://www.asicspace.com/ ★★ Best Prices in the hosting Industry! ★★★★
bitkilo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1010


https://www.bitcoin.com/


View Profile WWW
December 10, 2014, 04:32:10 AM
 #33

Please tell me you have looked into insurance, just incase, if so was it hard to get insurance?
Your putting alot of hard work and money into his and i wouldn't want to see it go up in smoke like the mining facility in Thailand.
These guys had NO insurance!
http://www.coindesk.com/gallery-fire-destroys-thai-bitcoin-mining-facility/

ASICSPACE (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Feel free to contact me via email, skype or phone!


View Profile WWW
December 10, 2014, 05:06:29 AM
 #34

Please tell me you have looked into insurance, just incase, if so was it hard to get insurance?
Your putting alot of hard work and money into his and i wouldn't want to see it go up in smoke like the mining facility in Thailand.
These guys had NO insurance!
http://www.coindesk.com/gallery-fire-destroys-thai-bitcoin-mining-facility/

Yes we have coverage for fire, theft, and electric surges for the full market value of all our customer's equipment in the data center. We're insured through Farmers.

★★★★ Bitcoin Miner Hosting! ★★★★ $55/kw-month ★★★★ http://www.asicspace.com/ ★★ Best Prices in the hosting Industry! ★★★★
spazzdla
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 10, 2014, 09:28:02 PM
 #35

5000 AMP SWITCH gear you boys are serious.  480VAC.. 600VAC is where it is at!! GO CANADA!! lmao. 

Thanks for the pics looks good!!
ASICSPACE (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Feel free to contact me via email, skype or phone!


View Profile WWW
December 10, 2014, 11:52:17 PM
 #36

No raised flooring? cold air from above?  

Do vents all line the exterior walls?  Just judging from the garage door, is the cold air entering from ~15-20 ft.?

are you doing hot aisle/cold aisle?

Was this building custom built?

or re-purposed with warehouse racks?

The high ceiling are nice, assuming the cooling intake is all the way up on the ceiling.

We are doing hot/cold aisle. Our engineers assure us the high ceilings and concrete will do a lot of the work dissapating the heat for us.

so I assume then the venting on the side is an attempt to use force airflow for cooling.  Each pass over a hot aisle will dilute the cooling to the center most rows.  In essence you'll be fighting thermal dynamics and having to over cool (and waste much more energy) attempting to reduce hot spots in the center.  Higher hardware failures and reduced performance (some hardware will under-clock itself to reduce temp) in the center of the center aisle (or other areas, depending on how the forced flow venting is positioned).  While concrete does have decent thermal conductivity, unless the air you are pumping is warmer than the external temperature, it will actually warm the air coming from the wall adjacent venting (see 4th photo on your initial post). Essentially your venting will be cooling the wall first, then the equipment. Furthermore, the first hot aisle will create thermal turbulence in cooling airflow, thus giving inconsistent results to your cooling attempts.  This is why most data centers have moved toward something like what's in this simple image:



now I'm not trying to troll or dig on you, more so trying to give potential improvements, but this would be an issue better dealt with prior to having hardware on the racks which will only create migration complexity in the future.  The user experience to watch out for, if this is the going forward scenario, is constant complaints of "I have 4 identical units with 1 (located in a possible hot spot) that consistently under performs."

Also, another consideration, when in a heterogeneous hardware situation (I assume you'll be hosting many different brands) and user controlled overclocking your thermal zones will be in constant flux.  I just feel concern that this will create the dreaded whack-a-hot-spot situation many early data centers  experienced.  Without a view of your actual cooling plan, I can only go by what I see in the photo.

Take some pictures of the Cooling planned.  Grin

I too would love to see these.

Edit: Great resource if your looking to leverage some free advise  http://hightech.lbl.gov/datacenters.html

Wow I'm surprised, you have nailed some of the issues our engineers were scratching their heads over. We have a solution, wait until cooling is fully built and I'll post some pics.

Hi Endlessa,

I ran your thoughts by our top engineer and wanted to share with you the following response:

Your thoughts here are all valid, and indeed, likely correct or improvements.  In fact, there's nothing I would even disagree with or argue against, and most of these are things that I myself have considered and either brought up or opted to deliberately not mention.  There are a couple of mitigating factors that you may not be aware of:

#1 - The exhaust is all very high up, about 70 feet with a colossal amount of total cubic feet to distribute heat.  As you no doubt know, heat rises, such that even in short distances the ambient temperature difference between floor and ceiling can be high.  This will strongly work in our favor by causing a large pressure differental between the heat exhausts and the cool intakes(down low) even without fans.  The question will be how much, and that is what we are going to find out; it is very difficult to calculate with all the added variables.

#2 - Hot spots.  We actually have a *lot* of control over the power and heat density of our equipment.  We can respond to hot spots not only by adjusting cooling, but also by adjusting miner's physical locations and/or densities, something datacenters cannot do.

#3 - We are specifically not doing things that datacenters do for a lot of reasons.  While it is easy to look at this situation and come up with improvements to efficiency, much more difficult is pricing out the total cost of various options, including labor, later adjustments, failure rates and scenarios, and regulations(Raised floors aren't actually cheap, especially not if built per code), and making the right decision.  That isn't to say that your ideas are wrong, or that our process is the best.  There are just a lot of things that go into the conclusions.  Every large scale Bitcoin mine I am familiar with(many) has been built for far less than even cheap datacenters, even after accounting for inefficiencies and later improvements needed.

Drastically changing our approach so late would cause us to not launch on our promised deadlines for our numerous signed customers.  Ultimately though, it doesn't matter.  We won't be forced to- we are working with an industry expert with a very large amount of industry cooling experience across lots of industrial and commercial setups, including datacenters.  Our agreements are such that they are on the hook- REALLY on the hook, not just some legal we'll-sue-you crap- for any inadequacies of the cooling.  With no upper limit on the cost- if they found that a raised floor was necessary, they'd be on the hook for it.  Conversely, they made the design decisions regarding this after carefully evaluating the costs.  I've reviewed their design carefully(With your same thoughts in mind) and confirmed that any cooling inadequacies that occur can be fixed by scaling and building a few cost-effective components.  We are intentionally launching in the dead of winter which will give us ample time to experiment and improve before peak temperatures arrive.  We already have improvements planned and specific measurements that will tell us which improvements we need.  We also have some climate advantages with our particular setup specifics that work in our favor.

tl;dr: I agree with your thoughts, but it isn't necessary as others are on the hook to ensure temps are appropriate, and plans are in place.

★★★★ Bitcoin Miner Hosting! ★★★★ $55/kw-month ★★★★ http://www.asicspace.com/ ★★ Best Prices in the hosting Industry! ★★★★
ASICSPACE (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Feel free to contact me via email, skype or phone!


View Profile WWW
December 11, 2014, 06:53:51 PM
 #37

Hey, I climbed up a ladder and took this pic. Nice angle, eh?


★★★★ Bitcoin Miner Hosting! ★★★★ $55/kw-month ★★★★ http://www.asicspace.com/ ★★ Best Prices in the hosting Industry! ★★★★
chicagoleo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 11, 2014, 09:32:02 PM
 #38

Here is an idea for you, in this video check out how our data center Cold Isle setup is done at economic cost..  We use standard clear acoustic ceiling tiles to contain the cold air from the raised floor and distribute hot air up high to be drawn in by two liebert downdraft 30 Ton AC Units.

http://www.mystarpoint.com/datacenter/

What do you think?
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 11, 2014, 09:39:55 PM
 #39


tl;dr: I agree with your thoughts, but it isn't necessary as others are on the hook to ensure temps are appropriate, and plans are in place.

Yeah I figured cost effective measures and timeline were the constraining factors Smiley lol aren't they always Smiley  You're right, in that you have plenty of time before the external temps (I think the worry starts around july).  There will be some low hanging fruit you can do as the heat encroaches.  Those metal doors would be priority to seal and insulate, that would be my first target in the coming months.  Running Insulation to the thermocline (heat/cool barrier, should be somewhere around the dark line on the concrete in your latest photo slightly above where the cool air outputs are located.  Both easy and cost effective solutions. 

Also an added bonus, those overhead, what I assume are wire runs, frames would work well for dropping vents above cold aisles if thermal turbulence prevents airflow.  Shouldn't be an overly expensive solution, if you find it necessary later.

I would suggest buying a bunch of cheap digital thermometers, if you don't already have a more sophisticated solution.  1 per rack section and a clipboard patrols/recording (I love low tech solutions) should let you moderately trouble shoot your arrangement.

Great timing on hitting this in the winter Smiley It will give you plenty of time to observe heat distribution while you still have plenty of cooling bandwidth before summer.  I hope some of this is useful for you and wish you the best of luck.  If you ever want to bounce ideas, just send me a PM.  I love this stuff.  Keep up the good work.
johny08
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 12, 2014, 12:08:03 PM
 #40

pretty empty.

how mw ventilation do you use for how much mw mining gears?
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!