Are you FILTHY rich with Bitcoins ?

[ofirbeigel]

any clone website or something like that?
this one does not work

The host is migrating it will be back ASAP.

Website is up again )

[1715336301]

1715336301

[Possum577]

Well this seems like an interesting idea to log all the IPs who claim to have a lot of coin.... ... ... ...

AGREED!

If they don't allow the data and stats to be seen without entering a Bitcoin address it sounds might suspect.

[Q7]

Awesome and kudos to the guy who created that website. From the result, it shows that I'm one of those filthy rich bitcoiners at the top 90% bracket. 

PS for those guys viewing in firefox, you can try to load it in chrome. there's some rendering issue there but I think the dev should be able to easily fix it soon.

[ofirbeigel]

Awesome and kudos to the guy who created that website. From the result, it shows that I'm one of those filthy rich bitcoiners at the top 90% bracket. 

PS for those guys viewing in firefox, you can try to load it in chrome. there's some rendering issue there but I think the dev should be able to easily fix it soon.

What's the issue exactly with Firefox ? What OS are you using ?

[Rub3n]

U only need a small bit to become super rich, relatively

[gamerholicdotcom]

U only need a small bit to become super rich, relatively

richer than 87% i guess most of the adresses have dust balances

[2dogs]

Wouldn't work for me on Firefox.

Tried with chrome - good for shits and giggles!

[botany]

It tells me I am pretty rich. 
Do you think addresses with zero balances are included in the calculations?
I should think addresses with spent bitcoins should be excluded.

[elephantas1]

It tells me I am pretty rich. 
Do you think addresses with zero balances are included in the calculations?
I should think addresses with spent bitcoins should be excluded.

Total addresses with balances:3 872 730

So i dont think they are included

[ofirbeigel]

It tells me I am pretty rich. 
Do you think addresses with zero balances are included in the calculations?
I should think addresses with spent bitcoins should be excluded.

Total addresses with balances:3 872 730

So i dont think they are included

All addresses that have a non zero balance are included - this means dust addresses are included.

[Superhitech]

This made me feel better about myself but yes, there are so many addresses created that have nothing/a few satoshis in it, so technically you aren't that much richer compared to active bitcoiners.

[Kprawn]

YOU ARE RICHER THAN 0,61% OF BITCOINERS 

It has a side note : Get a real job......

[ofirbeigel]

This made me feel better about myself but yes, there are so many addresses created that have nothing/a few satoshis in it, so technically you aren't that much richer compared to active bitcoiners.

I think I'll add an option to calculate only addresses above a certain number of Bitcoins soon so you'll have a clearer view

[youngmike]

Fiat rich 

[Zendikar]

It looks like the majority of users simply have a wallet and have little to no funds.