Bitcoin Forum
December 18, 2017, 01:43:19 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin Core 0.10.0rc1 has been released  (Read 6549 times)
Madness
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


My goal is becaming a billionaire.


View Profile WWW
December 31, 2014, 07:01:09 AM
 #81

If it needs to reindex you'll have to wait for it. But it should go faster with the RC build...

It was reindexing as you said .. but suddenly and when It reached the "2 years xx weeks" It start synchronizing with the network again and now I should wait a lot ... why It didn't continue reindexing fast till 13 weeks left where it stopped exactly ?

1513604599
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513604599

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513604599
Reply with quote  #2

1513604599
Report to moderator
1513604599
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513604599

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513604599
Reply with quote  #2

1513604599
Report to moderator
1513604599
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513604599

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513604599
Reply with quote  #2

1513604599
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722


Zabercoin – An Asset Backed Cryptocurrency


View Profile
January 01, 2015, 08:54:36 PM
 #82

when the "delete address" will be added? it's not that important i know, but it's always a plus to have
You mean the option of deleting an address from a wallet?
Interesting, request, it would definitely be very useful.

yeah, right now you need to re-create a new wallet to do this, it could be doing easily with a send to other folder that hide them

anyway this version is not signed yet, it is because of the rc1 state?

THE FUTURE OF
REAL ESTATE
..

║║
║║
║║
▬▬ ● ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ● ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ● ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬ ● ● ▬▬

║║
║║
║║
Parazyd
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602


Space Lord


View Profile WWW
January 01, 2015, 09:47:47 PM
 #83

when the "delete address" will be added? it's not that important i know, but it's always a plus to have
You mean the option of deleting an address from a wallet?
Interesting, request, it would definitely be very useful.

yeah, right now you need to re-create a new wallet to do this, it could be doing easily with a send to other folder that hide them

anyway this version is not signed yet, it is because of the rc1 state?

It is. Grab the SHA256SUMS.asc file from the directory.
philiveyjr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 840


View Profile
January 01, 2015, 10:26:08 PM
 #84

Downloaded it.!!! Takes forever to sync.! :/

ulatec
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17


View Profile
January 02, 2015, 06:48:59 AM
 #85

Digging the new fee interface Cheesy
Blazr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882



View Profile
January 02, 2015, 06:51:21 AM
 #86

Initial sync is faster than it used to be, but it's still faster to torrent bootstrap.dat and sync that way.

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722


Zabercoin – An Asset Backed Cryptocurrency


View Profile
January 02, 2015, 01:09:25 PM
 #87

when the "delete address" will be added? it's not that important i know, but it's always a plus to have
You mean the option of deleting an address from a wallet?
Interesting, request, it would definitely be very useful.

yeah, right now you need to re-create a new wallet to do this, it could be doing easily with a send to other folder that hide them

anyway this version is not signed yet, it is because of the rc1 state?

It is. Grab the SHA256SUMS.asc file from the directory.

windows it say the typical caution message when i run the installer

THE FUTURE OF
REAL ESTATE
..

║║
║║
║║
▬▬ ● ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ● ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ● ● ▬▬▬▬▬▬ ● ● ▬▬

║║
║║
║║
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 02:21:36 PM
 #88

 Wink Perfect, the RC3 of 0.10.0 work with WinXP 32 bits + all KBs installed ... and a solo-mining server or P2Pool mining client.  Grin

Buffer Overflow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 05:43:44 PM
 #89

I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet?

Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 06:03:32 PM
 #90

what is internet for you ?
 Grin for me, it's an updated software connected at internet.
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 06:03:33 PM
 #91

I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet anything made by Microsoft to the Internet?

FTFY

Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 07:31:49 PM
 #92

Win : 91%
Mac : 7%
Linux : 2%

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-Now-Running-on-More-than-91-Percent-of-Computers-Worldwide-364513.shtml


you can't learn from depreciates OS ... to do what you "want" to do.
i can't do what i want in mac or linux system because of proprietary driver and ... proprietary software (i don't talk about adobe or nvidia, folks).
IIOII
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1101



View Profile WWW
January 16, 2015, 08:02:10 PM
 #93

I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet?

What makes you think that newer versions of Windows are safer?

Maybe these versions even have more intentional backdoors than the previous ones.

Using XP is unsafe only if you use Internet Explorer and allow scripts.

Buffer Overflow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 08:26:10 PM
 #94

I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet?

What makes you think that newer versions of Windows are safer?

Bit of a strawman reply here. I never mentioned anything about newer versions of Windows being safer.

IIOII
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1101



View Profile WWW
January 17, 2015, 01:06:29 PM
 #95

I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet?

What makes you think that newer versions of Windows are safer?

Bit of a strawman reply here. I never mentioned anything about newer versions of Windows being safer.


Not intended. I really thought you were advocating an update to a newer Windows version.

From my point of view both Windows and Linux systems will never be 100% secure. I know that Linux users tend to think that their system is more secure, but an open source code does not help if people don't review the code and identify all attack vectors before others exploit them. From my point of view what's most important is to be aware that no system is 100% secure and adjust behavior accordingly.

Edit: On topic: I'm really looking forward to the final release of 0.10.0. There are a lot of great improvements.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!