VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position

[Shallow]

Do you have a reading disability?  IB just gave the answer - the same answer I've been giving for a week.   

That's not something TECSHARE said. iCEBREAKER said that.

You should re-read, because iCEBREAKER was not commenting for you side. He was commenting against you.

[Vod]

Do you have a reading disability?  IB just gave the answer - the same answer I've been giving for a week.   

That's not something TECSHARE said. iCEBREAKER said that.

You should re-read, because iCEBREAKER was not commenting for you side. He was commenting against you.

IB answered the question that $username asked.  Re-read it, slower this time.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

I expect a number of you shills will abuse the trust system and lie on your feedback about me.

ROFL now you are calling everyone criticizing you as "shills" and saying they are "lying" again.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

Do you have a reading disability?  IB just gave the answer - the same answer I've been giving for a week.   

That's not something TECSHARE said. iCEBREAKER said that.

You should re-read, because iCEBREAKER was not commenting for you side. He was commenting against you.

IB answered the question that $username asked.  Re-read it, slower this time.

No, he wasn't answering my question.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=916867.msg10078743#msg10078743

[Mitchell]

To make it simple, this is the lie according to Vod:

Default trust list members are held to rigorously high standards and promptly removed if they abuse their position.

Unless their name is Vod.

[Vod]

To make it simple, this is the lie according to Vod:

Default trust list members are held to rigorously high standards and promptly removed if they abuse their position.

Unless their name is Vod.

Thank you bitcoininformation.  I hope this will help them understand.

[Shallow]

To make it simple, this is the lie according to Vod:

Default trust list members are held to rigorously high standards and promptly removed if they abuse their position.

Unless their name is Vod.

TECSHARE never said that. Where did TECShARE say this?

iCEBREAKER was commenting on the situation. This was his own words, not something he says is a lie.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

Thank you bitcoininformation.  I hope this will help them understand.

This is not a statement that TECSHARE made.

[Vod]

To make it simple, this is the lie according to Vod:

Default trust list members are held to rigorously high standards and promptly removed if they abuse their position.

Unless their name is Vod.

TECSHARE never said that. Where did TECShARE say this?

iCEBREAKER was commenting on the situation. This was his own words, not something he says is a lie.

TECSHARE never said that.  IB said that.   Sorry this is so hard for you to understand.  

[iCEBREAKER]

IB just gave the answer - the same answer I've been giving for a week.   
 

I did no such thing.

That smart-ass attempt to put words in my mouth and avoid answering an inconvenient question doesn't make your recent misbehavior any less unacceptable.

Your account is "possibly hacked" and you should be removed from default trust until you prove otherwise.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

I did no such thing.

That smart-ass attempt to put words in my mouth and avoid answering an inconvenient question doesn't make your recent misbehavior any less unacceptable.

Your account is "possibly hacked" and you should be removed from default trust until you prove otherwise.

See?

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

To make it simple, this is the lie according to Vod:

In the future, please read other responses before jumping into the fire and putting words into other people's mouth.

[Blazr]

Vod's account is acting strange. Quick! everyone neg him with "possibly hacked".  

[Shallow]

TECSHARE never said that.  IB said that.   Sorry this is so hard for you to understand.  

Yes, and iCEBREAKER did not say that as a lie that TECSHARE said.

What's a lie that TECSHARE has made about you?! Answer this question and stop dodging it.

[Vod]

$username asked what the lie was that TECSHARE told.

IB gave the answer in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10078798#msg10078798

Those aren't the exact words that TECSHARE used, but the meaning, the subject, is the same.

Understand now guys?

[Mitchell]

In the future, please read other responses before jumping into the fire and putting words into other people's mouth.

How do I put words into someone's mouth if I literally quote what they said?

[redsn0w]

Vod's account is acting strange. Quick everyone neg him with "account hacked"!   

Ahahaha done  !  However can we stop ? I think all this discussion is not necessary , it ruins the forum image.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

IB gave the answer in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10078798#msg10078798

No, IB did not answer.

I did no such thing.

That smart-ass attempt to put words in my mouth and avoid answering an inconvenient question doesn't make your recent misbehavior any less unacceptable.

Your account is "possibly hacked" and you should be removed from default trust until you prove otherwise.

[Vod]

I also answered the same question at the top of page 2 of this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10065704#msg10065704

How many times are you guys going to demand the same thing?  

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

In the future, please read other responses before jumping into the fire and putting words into other people's mouth.

How do I put words into someone's mouth if I literally quote what they said?

You claimed that iCEBREAKER said that as a "lie" that TECSHARE made.

iCEBREAKER did not say that as a "lie" that TECSHARE made.

iCEBREAKER made that statement as a comment on the situtation - NOT something TECSHARE lied about (because he never lied about anything).

Vod is the one lying about TECSHARE "lying".

Understand this now?