|
The_Prof
|
 |
January 19, 2015, 06:59:03 PM |
|
I just want to throw in a quick word. It seems that as days go on the amount I stake per 24 hour period is slowly increasing.
|
Look over there...
|
|
|
|
Frazazel
|
|
January 19, 2015, 07:09:26 PM |
|
What's happening to the price  I thought this was good shit |
|
|
|
TimC
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022
|
|
January 19, 2015, 07:09:53 PM |
|
Why would i disable staking just because i sent some coins?
Of course i want to stake the remaining coins.
And of course i want to keep staking the coins i already have when i have made a new address.
My guess is when they were testing/creating staking they ran into a issue when you go to send the coins but just then some coins go into stake and that could make the translation fail since now you do not have enough coins to send. So to fix that problem they turned off staking when coins are to be sent. I'm not sure why they did not turn back on staking (or check to see if they turned it off to turn it back on). I'm sure it would be a easy fix since you have their pass phrase when you are sending the coins and can issue the unlock for staking command |
|
|
|
|
|
elektrax
|
|
January 19, 2015, 07:29:08 PM |
|
What's happening to the price I thought this was good shit wow. 1200 gp got dumped at trex it'l pick up again probably.. but its a pretty thin market when a .07 btc dump takes the price down 30%.. edit but im gonna put in some buy at the current buy levels...pretty cheap if someone decides to dump again before the spread closes |
BTC: 1G6Fc3sWL9E9DShfitjQvP2SGXvNLbqzGz | GP: GdTPHPNRV6P49mtW6Bc8kFBvRx4oofx4eX
|
|
|
|
inkha (OP)
|
|
January 19, 2015, 09:11:58 PM |
|
What's happening to the price I thought this was good shit wow. 1200 gp got dumped at trex it'l pick up again probably.. but its a pretty thin market when a .07 btc dump takes the price down 30%.. edit but im gonna put in some buy at the current buy levels...pretty cheap if someone decides to dump again before the spread closes Trying to get some more fiat to support price as well here. It's not the end after the first game we can build another, and expand overall so there is plenty of opportunities for growth. Someone must have just needed the cash they invested. |
GoldPieces - An expandable digital currency to be used as an in-game currency.
|
|
|
|
toddtervy
|
|
January 19, 2015, 09:18:08 PM |
|
What's happening to the price I thought this was good shit wow. 1200 gp got dumped at trex it'l pick up again probably.. but its a pretty thin market when a .07 btc dump takes the price down 30%.. edit but im gonna put in some buy at the current buy levels...pretty cheap if someone decides to dump again before the spread closes Trying to get some more fiat to support price as well here. It's not the end after the first game we can build another, and expand overall so there is plenty of opportunities for growth. Someone must have just needed the cash they invested. Any update on game? I like what I saw so far. Also I'm looking into getting another game developer onboard. |
Get off my c@ck !
|
|
|
|
elektrax
|
|
January 19, 2015, 09:31:45 PM |
|
Price back up to over 6k... (i totally called it  ) I really like this coin situation; my stakes gets me about 100k sat per day, about 1/6 of that my mining equipment does. (~20mhs) So my GPieces wallet is a 3.3mhs miner, really. Lol. |
BTC: 1G6Fc3sWL9E9DShfitjQvP2SGXvNLbqzGz | GP: GdTPHPNRV6P49mtW6Bc8kFBvRx4oofx4eX
|
|
|
|
NSCrypto
|
|
January 19, 2015, 11:34:57 PM |
|
// miner's coin stake reward based on coin age spent (coin-days)
int64_t GetProofOfStakeReward(int64_t nCoinAge, int64_t nFees)
{
int64_t nRewardCoinYear;
nRewardCoinYear = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
int64_t nSubsidy = nCoinAge * nRewardCoinYear / 365 / COIN;
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
} wait a second the last part of that equation. Is that dividing the reward by the amount of coins your staking? if so wouldn't that mean more coins = less reward? lulz just ctrl-f in code for COIN. Stop assuming things  |
|
|
|
|
toddtervy
|
|
January 20, 2015, 01:09:06 AM |
|
// miner's coin stake reward based on coin age spent (coin-days)
int64_t GetProofOfStakeReward(int64_t nCoinAge, int64_t nFees)
{
int64_t nRewardCoinYear;
nRewardCoinYear = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
int64_t nSubsidy = nCoinAge * nRewardCoinYear / 365 / COIN;
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
} wait a second the last part of that equation. Is that dividing the reward by the amount of coins your staking? if so wouldn't that mean more coins = less reward? lulz just ctrl-f in code for COIN. Stop assuming things It's pretty obvious that it's working and coded differently then the other POS coins. |
Get off my c@ck !
|
|
|
|
NSCrypto
|
|
January 20, 2015, 02:16:23 AM |
|
// miner's coin stake reward based on coin age spent (coin-days)
int64_t GetProofOfStakeReward(int64_t nCoinAge, int64_t nFees)
{
int64_t nRewardCoinYear;
nRewardCoinYear = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
int64_t nSubsidy = nCoinAge * nRewardCoinYear / 365 / COIN;
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
} wait a second the last part of that equation. Is that dividing the reward by the amount of coins your staking? if so wouldn't that mean more coins = less reward? lulz just ctrl-f in code for COIN. Stop assuming things It's pretty obvious that it's working and coded differently then the other POS coins. Obviously....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBear
|
|
January 20, 2015, 07:40:08 AM |
|
Hopefully the mystery behind GP staking will be solved...  |
|
|
|
|
|
inkha (OP)
|
|
January 20, 2015, 04:29:03 PM |
|
Hopefully the mystery behind GP staking will be solved... Staking perfectly fine for me here still. Rewards seem to be getting a little bigger but that could just be network fluctuation |
GoldPieces - An expandable digital currency to be used as an in-game currency.
|
|
|
vegasguy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1003
"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!
|
|
January 20, 2015, 04:39:22 PM |
|
Hopefully the mystery behind GP staking will be solved... Staking perfectly fine for me here still. Rewards seem to be getting a little bigger but that could just be network fluctuation Send me a link on the chain from ANY wallet with a stake reward of over 2.5. Would love to see it. Vegas |
I want to make sure everyone knows that I just released my software called "Yobit pump alert". THis is custom software that uses an algo to detect the start of a pump here on yobit, the second it starts. YOu can even filter the coins you see by price. Most pumps start less than 100 sats , so you can easily filter the cheap coins, so they are the only ones displayed  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1945937.msg20241953#msg20241953 |
|
|
|
HYPERfuture
|
|
January 20, 2015, 04:42:17 PM |
|
Hopefully the mystery behind GP staking will be solved... Staking perfectly fine for me here still. Rewards seem to be getting a little bigger but that could just be network fluctuation Send me a link on the chain from ANY wallet with a stake reward of over 2.5. Would love to see it. Vegas 2.5 seems to be the daily staking maximum. This means the optimal amounts to have your GP in, in separate inputs is whatever will stake 2.5 per day. Can't be bothered doing the maths right now though |
|
|
|
|
candlesticks
|
|
January 20, 2015, 04:56:33 PM |
|
Hopefully the mystery behind GP staking will be solved... Staking perfectly fine for me here still. Rewards seem to be getting a little bigger but that could just be network fluctuation I guess you have to have the inside info to be able to get 500%, because nobody else is. People can copy and paste all the code they want, the block explorer contains evidence showing staking at varying percentages, depending on the size of the blocks. If this is intentional, then it should be explained. The majority of the users aren't even familiar with coin control, let alone digging through code. If this is meant to be brought to the masses, more information needs to be given, in laymen terms. The bottom line is this coin behaves much different than other PoS coins, and there has been no rational explanation as of yet. "Just wait a month" doesn't cut it. Whoever actually wrote this code should have knowledge to answer the questions that have been brought forth. |
|
|
|
|
HYPERfuture
|
|
January 20, 2015, 05:01:11 PM |
|
Hopefully the mystery behind GP staking will be solved... Staking perfectly fine for me here still. Rewards seem to be getting a little bigger but that could just be network fluctuation I guess you have to have the inside info to be able to get 500%, because nobody else is. People can copy and paste all the code they want, the block explorer contains evidence showing staking at varying percentages, depending on the size of the blocks. If this is intentional, then it should be explained. The majority of the users aren't even familiar with coin control, let alone digging through code. If this is meant to be brought to the masses, more information needs to be given, in laymen terms. The bottom line is this coin behaves much different than other PoS coins, and there has been no rational explanation as of yet. "Just wait a month" doesn't cut it. Whoever actually wrote this code should have knowledge to answer the questions that have been brought forth. As I said above it is as simple as dividing your GP into the optimal amounts to stake 2.5 GP daily from ALL your GP so they are staking in separate groups. Like some other coins GP obviously has a limit on how big a group of coins can be and any coins over that limit do not stake extra which is why optimal staking will be found by grouping the GP into smaller amounts for staking purpses. If no one else does the calculation I will share my findings with the community soon when I have time. I agree the code should be updated so it stakes the correct amount whether someone is staking 100 GP or 10 000 GP but it will only take 5 minutes to separate the coins some of us are just working out the exact optimal amount. Not sure why everyone keeps complaining when I keep posting the solution? |
|
|
|
|
SBear
|
|
January 20, 2015, 05:08:40 PM |
|
Hopefully the mystery behind GP staking will be solved... Staking perfectly fine for me here still. Rewards seem to be getting a little bigger but that could just be network fluctuation I guess you have to have the inside info to be able to get 500%, because nobody else is. People can copy and paste all the code they want, the block explorer contains evidence showing staking at varying percentages, depending on the size of the blocks. If this is intentional, then it should be explained. The majority of the users aren't even familiar with coin control, let alone digging through code. If this is meant to be brought to the masses, more information needs to be given, in laymen terms. The bottom line is this coin behaves much different than other PoS coins, and there has been no rational explanation as of yet. "Just wait a month" doesn't cut it. Whoever actually wrote this code should have knowledge to answer the questions that have been brought forth. As I said above it is as simple as dividing your GP into the optimal amounts to stake 2.5 GP daily from ALL your GP so they are staking in separate groups. Like some other coins GP obviously has a limit on how big a group of coins can be and any coins over that limit do not stake extra which is why optimal staking will be found by grouping the GP into smaller amounts for staking purpses. If no one else does the calculation I will share my findings with the community soon when I have time. I agree the code should be updated so it stakes the correct amount whether someone is staking 100 GP or 10 000 GP but it will only take 5 minutes to separate the coins some of us are just working out the exact optimal amount. Not sure why everyone keeps complaining when I keep posting the solution? Because it isn't a direct solution from the developer. Which sadly the developer cannot answer that question, as he himself doesn't have the direct answer to it. He's even admitted himself that he's still learning about the coin. In my opinion if you develop something you should in fact know how it functions inside and out, or so I would assume. One fact we can at least rest with knowing is he's dedicated to the success of his pet game at this current point in time. Though I fear the issue with staking will cause most people to eventually start dumping, if they aren't doing so now. There's too much speculation surrounding staking GP with no real direct answer from an official developer. Until then we can rely on cumulative knowledge to help aid in the success of GP until all the kinks are worked out. |
|
|
|
|
vegasguy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1003
"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!
|
|
January 20, 2015, 05:11:21 PM |
|
Then if the dev doesnt know, there are LOADS of devs out there than he can hire for a short time, and a small fee to fix this code. Just leaving it like this will destroy the coins value.
Vegas
|
I want to make sure everyone knows that I just released my software called "Yobit pump alert". THis is custom software that uses an algo to detect the start of a pump here on yobit, the second it starts. YOu can even filter the coins you see by price. Most pumps start less than 100 sats , so you can easily filter the cheap coins, so they are the only ones displayed https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1945937.msg20241953#msg20241953 |
|
|
|
HYPERfuture
|
|
January 20, 2015, 05:20:17 PM |
|
Hopefully the mystery behind GP staking will be solved... Staking perfectly fine for me here still. Rewards seem to be getting a little bigger but that could just be network fluctuation I guess you have to have the inside info to be able to get 500%, because nobody else is. People can copy and paste all the code they want, the block explorer contains evidence showing staking at varying percentages, depending on the size of the blocks. If this is intentional, then it should be explained. The majority of the users aren't even familiar with coin control, let alone digging through code. If this is meant to be brought to the masses, more information needs to be given, in laymen terms. The bottom line is this coin behaves much different than other PoS coins, and there has been no rational explanation as of yet. "Just wait a month" doesn't cut it. Whoever actually wrote this code should have knowledge to answer the questions that have been brought forth. As I said above it is as simple as dividing your GP into the optimal amounts to stake 2.5 GP daily from ALL your GP so they are staking in separate groups. Like some other coins GP obviously has a limit on how big a group of coins can be and any coins over that limit do not stake extra which is why optimal staking will be found by grouping the GP into smaller amounts for staking purpses. If no one else does the calculation I will share my findings with the community soon when I have time. I agree the code should be updated so it stakes the correct amount whether someone is staking 100 GP or 10 000 GP but it will only take 5 minutes to separate the coins some of us are just working out the exact optimal amount. Not sure why everyone keeps complaining when I keep posting the solution? Because it isn't a direct solution from the developer. Which sadly the developer cannot answer that question, as he himself doesn't have the direct answer to it. He's even admitted himself that he's still learning about the coin. In my opinion if you develop something you should in fact know how it functions inside and out, or so I would assume. One fact we can at least rest with knowing is he's dedicated to the success of his pet game at this current point in time. Though I fear the issue with staking will cause most people to eventually start dumping, if they aren't doing so now. There's too much speculation surrounding staking GP with no real direct answer from an official developer. Until then we can rely on cumulative knowledge to help aid in the success of GP until all the kinks are worked out. This is true I do understand it. But as you say it is also true that it seems Inkha is 100% devoted to building GP infrastructure like the pet game and other long term projects. Most devs do not get to work as quickly as he has done on his projects for this coin. It is great. Also everyone I have staked 2.5 GP from a chunk of 100 GP I had in my wallet.
As 2.5 GP seems to be the maximum it looks like my hunch was correct and 100 GP inputs would be optimal to maximize staking  So divide the coins into 100 GP lots and start staking a lot more every day ** This info comes with no warranty but it is my opinion from my testing ** Hope someone else can post a tutorial for those that need it to do this I am too busy right now. |
|
|
|
|
