Psychiatrists Now Say Non-Conformity is a Mental Illness: Only the Sheeple are '

[username18333]

. . .

(Under my proposal, the "observation" of "multiplicity" is the observation of "parallel universes." However, it was not a serious one.)

"Random" is what you get when energy doesn't have constraints. Systems exhibit multiplicity because, at their most fundamental levels, the energy put into them is not constrained.

Except that we don't know this for sure. What we DO know is that everything that we know for sure operates by cause and effect without random.

That's "theory" in much the same way black holes are, and theory in none of the ways that they are.

Right. And the greater the scientist, the more the cause and effect observation. Can't ever really prove anything, however.

I will explain my previous post.

Presently, black holes cannot be physically observed, but they can be mathematically observed; however, "universal causation" (let's say) can be neither physically observed nor mathematically observed.

[1715032931]

1715032931

[1715032931]

1715032931

[1715032931]

1715032931

[BADecker]

. . .

(Under my proposal, the "observation" of "multiplicity" is the observation of "parallel universes." However, it was not a serious one.)

"Random" is what you get when energy doesn't have constraints. Systems exhibit multiplicity because, at their most fundamental levels, the energy put into them is not constrained.

Except that we don't know this for sure. What we DO know is that everything that we know for sure operates by cause and effect without random.

That's "theory" in much the same way black holes are, and theory in none of the ways that they are.

Right. And the greater the scientist, the more the cause and effect observation. Can't ever really prove anything, however.

I will explain my previous post.

Presently, black holes cannot, by definition, be physically observed, but they can be mathematically observed. However, "universal causation" (let's say) can be neither physically observed nor mathematically observed.

Everything that we know about operates by cause and effect.  Since math produces answers that are pure in the mathematical form, there is no way to determine if reality has the same effect, since there are many operations in reality that may not be considered in math examples.

[username18333]

. . .

(Under my proposal, the "observation" of "multiplicity" is the observation of "parallel universes." However, it was not a serious one.)

"Random" is what you get when energy doesn't have constraints. Systems exhibit multiplicity because, at their most fundamental levels, the energy put into them is not constrained.

Except that we don't know this for sure. What we DO know is that everything that we know for sure operates by cause and effect without random.

That's "theory" in much the same way black holes are, and theory in none of the ways that they are.

Right. And the greater the scientist, the more the cause and effect observation. Can't ever really prove anything, however.

I will explain my previous post.

Presently, black holes cannot, by definition, be physically observed, but they can be mathematically observed. However, "universal causation" (let's say) can be neither physically observed nor mathematically observed.

Everything that we know about operates by cause and effect.  Since math produces answers that are pure in the mathematical form, there is no way to determine if reality has the same effect, since there are many operations in reality that may not be considered in math examples.

Mathematics is the language with which God wrote the Universe.

[BADecker]

Mathematics is the language of the universe.

Mathematics is a language of man... one that he uses to attempt to describe the universe.

[username18333]

. . .

Mathematics is the language with which God wrote the Universe.

Mathematics is a language of man... one that he uses to attempt to describe the universe.

Language is an adaptation of culture—one that man uses to attempt to describe mathematics.

[BADecker]

. . .

Mathematics is the language with which God wrote the Universe.

Mathematics is a language of man... one that he uses to attempt to describe the universe.

Language is an adaptation of culture—one that man uses to attempt to describe mathematics.

I always wondered why they couldn't, for example, find the answer to pi.