rivvs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 02:13:57 AM |
|
Would you guys like a weekly litecoin ponzi?
|
|
|
|
james.lent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 02:15:23 AM |
|
Would you guys like a weekly litecoin ponzi?
nope.
|
|
|
|
ABitNut
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 02:17:31 AM |
|
... as this can happen to any of you. I'd like to continue playing the game but it should be fair. ...
1) This can only happen to those greedy/gullible enough to participate in ponzi schemes. 2) Ponzi schemes are by definition not fair. 3) Seeing all this you still want to continue playing. 4) Many people warned on this very thread Conclusion: Don't expect sympathy from me, let alone compensation.
|
|
|
|
james.lent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 03:06:04 AM |
|
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?
|
|
|
|
hollowtm
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 03:19:21 AM |
|
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?
This is exactly what I want to know, thanks!
|
|
|
|
mrhank
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 03:39:08 AM |
|
I think OP is right about that this game should not last 3 seconds. If people would reinvest, everyone would make more profit, as other people would also be willing to put money if there is a circulation.
|
|
|
|
james.lent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 03:58:09 AM |
|
I think OP is right about that this game should not last 3 seconds. If people would reinvest, everyone would make more profit, as other people would also be willing to put money if there is a circulation.
problem is people aren't willing to risk it (and by people i mean my self included). so that changes the game . So it mite as well be a hourly ponzi.
|
|
|
|
erwin45hacked
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 04:06:51 AM |
|
i called this yesterday, with weekly u can get more chance but instead you guys keep choosing and vote for 24 hours, see this is what i meant 3 seconds was the last to be paid, what about tommorow?people are getting smarter and faster by the day ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
james.lent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 04:08:43 AM |
|
i called this yesterday, with weekly u can get more chance but instead you guys keep choosing and vote for 24 hours, see this is what i meant 3 seconds was the last to be paid, what about tommorow?people are getting smarter and faster by the day ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I vote for hourly ponzi then , mite as well since its only a 3 second game .
|
|
|
|
tom14cat14
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 04:15:53 AM |
|
i called this yesterday, with weekly u can get more chance but instead you guys keep choosing and vote for 24 hours, see this is what i meant 3 seconds was the last to be paid, what about tommorow?people are getting smarter and faster by the day ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I have been there with you. The people wanting it to get shorter will soon see the volume keep dropping and seeing how you will have to be in the first second heck that might not even do it.
|
|
|
|
ninjaboon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 04:20:22 AM Last edit: January 21, 2015, 08:21:42 AM by ninjaboon |
|
Ok OP emailed me saying that he fixed the script for the next rounds. See below
"... the good news is I just managed to read the time from Blockchain in the API. So basically, starting from tomorrow's round payments will be paid according EXACTLY to the blockchain time. You can let the thread know that I have changed the code to read the time from blockchain.info EXACTLY.
These issues will never occur again. "
when is the payouts going out? and can OP post on this thread yet? update: I lost 2 btc in this ponzi.
|
|
|
|
james.lent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 04:24:35 AM |
|
Ok OP emailed me saying that he fixed the script for the next rounds. See below
"... the good news is I just managed to read the time from Blockchain in the API. So basically, starting from tomorrow's round payments will be paid according EXACTLY to the blockchain time. You can let the thread know that I have changed the code to read the time from blockchain.info EXACTLY.
These issues will never occur again. "
when is the payouts going out? and can OP post on this thread yet? payouts were long done i think op is still banned . You can check updates on his twitter : https://twitter.com/RealWeeklyPonzi/
|
|
|
|
padrino
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
https://www.bitworks.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 04:26:22 AM |
|
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?
This is exactly what I want to know, thanks! Ummmm, the protocol itself doesn't provide that kind of precision, at least the OP now has the timestamps agreeing with blockchain.info. In short the best that can be done is within a second, anything more assumptions need to be made about received time however that is dependent upon the source of the TX and how it is broadcast to the network.
|
|
|
|
lolikop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 04:50:40 AM |
|
fk this bullsh1t i will never play this ponzi again u better gamble on blackjack or roulette or play this nonsense
|
|
|
|
padrino
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
https://www.bitworks.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 04:53:27 AM |
|
fk this bullsh1t i will never play this ponzi again u better gamble on blackjack or roulette or play this nonsense
Based on how you you've been playing (from your talk on the thread) I am fairly sure you are in the black in a big way overall even if you have had some rough patches.. Sure 30% lose but that is the name of the game...
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 05:00:47 AM |
|
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?
It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions. Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain. There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses. Maybe they exist differently for a very long time. Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions. There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain. The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds. Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain. At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random. ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits.
|
|
|
|
eXoJack
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 05:02:57 AM |
|
fk this bullsh1t i will never play this ponzi again u better gamble on blackjack or roulette or play this nonsense
If you wanna play some blackjack http://paycoinjack.pw/
|
|
|
|
kashish948
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 05:48:58 AM |
|
OP is not replying to my emails. If you are reading this please reply!
|
|
|
|
mrhank
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 06:10:25 AM |
|
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?
It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions. Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain. There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses. Maybe they exist differently for a very long time. Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions. There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain. The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds. Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain. At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random. ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits. In his twitter, he mentioned he is going to use the blockchain timestamp, so that should fix the issue. but today everything was a mess.
|
|
|
|
james.lent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 21, 2015, 06:11:45 AM |
|
OP did you test your new script yet confirming it can detect to the milisecond when there's heavy flow of deposits ?
It is extremely doubtful that the script couldn't keep up with such a small amount of transactions. Probably what happens is the IPN is looking at the transactions in order it sees, but it is a massive race state around the globe until the transactions are planted into the blockchain. There are probably multiple versions of lists until a version is accepted by the node that blockchain uses. Maybe they exist differently for a very long time. Additionally around GMT 00:00:00 I did a series of transactions. There is a wide variation of when they are listed in the blockchain. The lowest times I saw was 2 seconds, the longest was 6 seconds with most times either 3 to 4 seconds. Today the play out time period was less than 3 seconds, which is less than the variation seen in just sending transactions and when they end up on the blockchain. At this point one would be better to just play a dice game since the overhead is lower and the results are mostly random. ~1% for a dice game vs 6.5% for the Ponzi, based on the deposits. In his twitter, he mentioned he is going to use the blockchain timestamp, so that should fix the issue. but today everything was a mess. im not gonna make any deposits tomorrow. gonna monitor first.
|
|
|
|
|