Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 11:09:24 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin for Corporations  (Read 943 times)
doobadoo (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 08, 2012, 09:30:00 PM
 #1

Hey all, i remember reading about different types of tx's that the BTC protocols supports more that just simple P2P tx;s.  That is, i know there is an escrow tx.  But were BTC to take off and large businesses were to use it, how it the world could they maintain security over their bitcoin balance?  That is to say, what's really stopping some kid in the accounting dept from txing all the available coins to an address he controls and then fleeing the country?

I imagine that control software can be devised that would hold the keys in a special sort of way, but is there anything built into the protocol?  That is, can we have an account that would require more than one signature to reduce the risk of this?  For example, an address that requires authentication of 3 out of 5 people to sign a tx.  Then coins could be diversified amongst accounts that require different circles of folks consent to send the coins.  Also it would be best if it didn't require ALL people because people leave, die, become nasty and hold out etc..

Corporation right now largely rely on a traceable/reversible banking system.  The worry more about detecting misappropriations than they have to worry about recovery techniques.  Once a higher up in a corporations treasury tells the merchant bank that a transfer was illegal they reverse it quickly.  No way to do that with BTC.    You have to worry about prevention instead of just detection.

"It is, quite honestly, the biggest challenge to central banking since Andrew Jackson." -evoorhees
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715252964
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252964

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252964
Reply with quote  #2

1715252964
Report to moderator
1715252964
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252964

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252964
Reply with quote  #2

1715252964
Report to moderator
1715252964
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252964

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252964
Reply with quote  #2

1715252964
Report to moderator
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
July 08, 2012, 09:54:16 PM
Last edit: July 08, 2012, 10:10:38 PM by DeathAndTaxes
 #2

Yes multi-sig would work for this and it is supported by the protocol (although incomplete at this point).  However more likely companies would employ similar technology that they do now to protect PKI private keys.  The use of hardware security modules could allow business rules to be enforced at an enterprise level while not allowing any employee to ever have access to the actual private key.  This would decouple access from the actual private key.  Removing employee access could done via normal PKI processes (for example sending access revocation command to the HSM).
Mike Hearn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1129


View Profile
July 08, 2012, 10:04:06 PM
Last edit: July 08, 2012, 10:24:16 PM by Mike Hearn
 #3

Also see, Sahai-Waters attribute based encryption:

http://eprint.iacr.org/2008/290.pdf
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!