znort987 (OP)
Early bitcoin miner
VIP
Member
 Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 12
|
 |
July 09, 2012, 03:44:20 PM
Last edit: April 22, 2013, 07:55:18 PM by znort987 |
|
z
|
|
|
|
|
ciuciu
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
|
|
July 09, 2012, 04:08:17 PM |
|
It has been real sluggish for me in the last week or so.
Anyone else experiencing the same ?
Very slow for me too. |
|
|
|
|
memvola
|
|
July 09, 2012, 04:57:35 PM |
|
It's usable, but it takes about 5-10 seconds for each page to load, and some more for the orderbook.
|
|
|
|
|
silverbox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 09, 2012, 05:10:25 PM |
|
It's usable, but it takes about 5-10 seconds for each page to load, and some more for the orderbook.
Ditto. |
|
|
|
|
|
amazingrando
|
|
July 09, 2012, 05:28:05 PM |
|
It's been hit or miss for me. I was trying to access it yesterday on an Amtrak train and it wouldn't load. This morning I got CloudFlare and nginx errors, but when I refreshed it loaded after about 10 seconds. Not exactly the speed you need in an exchange!
|
Bitbond - 105% PPS mining bond - mining payouts without buying hardware
|
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
|
|
July 09, 2012, 05:32:16 PM |
|
Yes, I think it is getting slower lately. I think it loads a lot of unnecessary history on all pages and in an inefficient way.
|
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone. |
|
|
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
|
|
July 09, 2012, 05:46:56 PM
Last edit: July 10, 2012, 04:32:34 AM by John (johnthedong) |
|
Slow like hell. I've been getting intermittent errors from calling GLBSE trade data through the API.
|
|
|
|
|
GeoRW
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 257
Trust No One
|
|
July 09, 2012, 06:05:28 PM |
|
lot of people running trade bots maybe
|
|
|
|
|
|
novusordo
|
|
July 09, 2012, 08:06:17 PM |
|
Every time I view the Markets page, the 30-day history column is filled with the actual data from the 30-day history, and the graph loads seconds later. Perhaps this is a contributing factor, especially as it happens for every security on the page.
|
|
|
|
PsychoticBoy
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1010
Parental Advisory Explicit Content
|
|
July 09, 2012, 08:36:24 PM |
|
If it gets any slower, the use of pigeons might be handy  |
|
|
|
|
Serge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 09, 2012, 08:37:45 PM |
|
GLBSE wins award of the slowest site of the year.
My only hope their security is much much better handled than their data rendering processes
|
|
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
|
July 09, 2012, 08:42:35 PM
Last edit: July 10, 2012, 04:00:02 AM by pekv2 |
|
Yes, very slow. And from what I understand bitcointalk.org is owned by glbse and I am also experiencing very slow load for bitcointalk.org.
I know I've stated this before in meta and was explained to me that it won't help the forums, but do you think adding SPDY to glbse would help?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPDYhe goal of SPDY is to reduce web page load time.[7] This is achieved by prioritizing and multiplexing the transfer of web page subresources so that only one connection per client is required.[1][8] TLS encryption is nearly ubiquitous in SPDY implementations, and transmissions are gzip or DEFLATE compressed by design (in contrast to HTTP, where the headers are not compressed). Moreover, servers may hint or even push content instead of awaiting individual requests for each resource of a web page.[9
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=;topic=79278.0
My spdy indicator does not notify me that glbse has implemented spdy.
I still think spdy would help the forum and glbss.Edit: If it gets any slower, the use of pigeons might be handy That is funny as heck. |
|
|
|
|
Inaba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 09, 2012, 08:46:21 PM |
|
Yeah, really slow... and because it's using TOTP it makes trying to use the GA 2FA an exercise in frustration. Nefario really should have gone with HOTP.  |
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
Serge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 09, 2012, 08:49:37 PM |
|
Yes, very slow. And from what I understand bitcointalk.org is owned by glbse and I am also experiencing very slow load for bitcointalk.org. I know I've stated this before in meta and was explained to me that it won't help the forums, but do you think adding SPDY to glbse would help? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPDYMy spdy indicator does not notify me that glbse has implemented spdy. Edit: If it gets any slower, the use of pigeons might be handy That is funny as heck. Before offering solution, root cause of problem needs to be identified first. IMO in case of GLBSE it has very little to do with connectivity and everything to do with database querying since their load have increased recently with traffic, DB is taking major hit. Few month ago it was flying with little to no traffic. |
|
|
|
|
|
unfinishe
|
|
July 09, 2012, 08:50:28 PM |
|
lot of people running trade bots maybe
Certainly not me, of course... *cough cough*  |
|
|
|
macboy80
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
July 09, 2012, 10:45:20 PM |
|
It has been real sluggish for me in the last week or so.
Anyone else experiencing the same ?
Ditto! |
|
|
|
|
|
ColdHardMetal
|
|
July 09, 2012, 11:07:41 PM |
|
And from what I understand bitcointalk.org is owned by glbse and I am also experiencing very slow load for bitcointalk.org.
I have no idea why you would think that, but it is completely untrue. |
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
|
July 10, 2012, 03:58:46 AM |
|
Ok, I was wrong, MT.GOX owns it. scratch my entire post.
|
|
|
|
|
GeoRW
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 257
Trust No One
|
|
July 10, 2012, 04:40:39 AM |
|
Ok, I was wrong, MT.GOX owns it. scratch my entire post.
Nah, must be pirate who owns it  |
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5502
Merit: 13916
|
|
July 10, 2012, 05:06:36 AM |
|
Ok, I was wrong, MT.GOX owns it.
This is also untrue. |
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
|
