ChainProfit.com - 27+ BTC Paid | 140% Return | Running over four months now

[Albert Hamilton]

I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.

I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.

Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug.

WoW ! You actually relaunched !! I thought, you'll close down and move on... I'll definitely give it a try again.

[1714033003]

1714033003

[1714033003]

1714033003

[1714033003]

1714033003

[1714033003]

1714033003

[1714033003]

1714033003

[GermanGiant]

www.CrazyPonzi.com
Transparent. Secure. Random.

Re-coded and Re-launched

The UI is great. This would probably play a crucial role to attract a lot of players...

[bytemuma]

All ponzi will be scam one day, you must be carefully..

[pandacoin]

I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.

[GermanGiant]

I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.

After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not.

[CrazyJoker]

I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.

After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not.

Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening

[arieq]

I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.

I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.

Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug.

So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ?

[CrazyJoker]

I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.

I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.

Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug.

So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ?

Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though.

[TheGeorge]

I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.

I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.

Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug.

So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ?

Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though.

Nice game. Will definitely give it a try. You might consider to create a signature campaign sort of a thing. Unique ponzi games are getting overshadowed by lots of crap around.

[cazkooo]

I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.

I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.

Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug.

So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ?

Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though.

i dont get this, how do you mean by distributing loss among multiple investor?will the losing investor is choosen randomly?

[CrazyJoker]

I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.

I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.

Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug.

So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ?

Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though.

i dont get this, how do you mean by distributing loss among multiple investor?will the losing investor is choosen randomly?

Oops... NO ! That statement was given in comparison to our previous rule where only the last investor was losing. Now, the losing invetors will be the group of last investors whose investment is not covered by other investors. There is no randomness in chosing the losing ones.

[Albert Hamilton]

I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.

After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not.

Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening

I wish more people play this game rather than getting scammed by overnight script-kiddies.

[elephantas1]

I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.

After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not.

Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening

I wish more people play this game rather than getting scammed by overnight script-kiddies.

this one will fail after some time also so you shouldnt be so sure about this one

[Albert Hamilton]

I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.

After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not.

Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening

I wish more people play this game rather than getting scammed by overnight script-kiddies.

this one will fail after some time also so you shouldnt be so sure about this one

I am not completely disagreeing with you. But, given the fact that this game has been developed from scratch in front of our eyes and it has a really appealing UI, I tend to believe that it will no evaporate like others. But, if it fails to draw attention to new players, then it is a sheer bad luck for OP.

[TheGeorge]

I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.

After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not.

Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening

I wish more people play this game rather than getting scammed by overnight script-kiddies.

this one will fail after some time also so you shouldnt be so sure about this one

I am not completely disagreeing with you. But, given the fact that this game has been developed from scratch in front of our eyes and it has a really appealing UI, I tend to believe that it will no evaporate like others. But, if it fails to draw attention to new players, then it is a sheer bad luck for OP.

More players are joining in. That is a good sign in my opinion.

[Vicecity]

no thanks.

[RocketSingh]

I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.

I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.

Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug.

So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ?

Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though.

i dont get this, how do you mean by distributing loss among multiple investor?will the losing investor is choosen randomly?

Oops... NO ! That statement was given in comparison to our previous rule where only the last investor was losing. Now, the losing invetors will be the group of last investors whose investment is not covered by other investors. There is no randomness in chosing the losing ones.

I would suggest the minimum amount to deposit at 0.01 BTC from next round. 0.0005 BTC is too low to play a Ponzi Game.

[onurakkas]

i will try

[resya]

I dont like the way of investors listed in the table, especially the "type" column. You should change that to something simpler so that every investor only listed once in the table (except if he makes 2 or more investments)

For ex : torro35 invested 0.001

torro35 | 0.001 | invested

When torro35 got paid, it doesnt add a new entry into the table but it will simply update the status and the text color to green

torro35 | 0.001 | PAID 0.0014

Also it'd be cool to add date/time when the investments were made and paid

[gkv9]

Is this site just an another one like nine9.ninja??
Is the structure same, except just the waiting time?