|
Bitcoin Oz
|
 |
July 15, 2012, 12:54:42 PM |
|
When it comes down to it bitcoin is the only choice that he can use that a government somewhere cant seize so it should be really attractive to him. If he supports it I will be so buying a megabox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
mccorvic
|
|
July 15, 2012, 12:56:41 PM |
|
I was trying to make more of a joke commenting on my opinion of twitter than anything  But if he is actually seeming interested, all the better. |
|
|
|
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 15, 2012, 01:05:47 PM |
|
I was trying to make more of a joke commenting on my opinion of twitter than anything But if he is actually seeming interested, all the better. My reply was more to the poster you were replying to than to you, sorry about the confusion. Edited my post for clarity. |
|
|
|
|
|
mokahless
|
|
July 15, 2012, 08:22:37 PM |
|
So anyway, I've read through this and the articles online and it seems he is completely ignoring the bitcoin suggestions and everyone is ignoring that he is ignoring them. I don't use twitter though. Thoughts on this?
How can he be ignoring those suggestons if he is retweeting them?  Have you seen him retweet any other payment provider suggestion besides Bitcoin? He also retweeted Matonis article on Forbes. https://twitter.com/ForbesTech/status/223409880755740672I thought that was forbes, some business news site, not him. Are you saying he owns forbes? I don't see the part from your link where it is him retweeting it. As I said, I don't use twitter so I haven't seen any tweets. But I have seen the forbes article that was tweeted there. My basis for what I am saying comes mainly from this thread, where I have seen no one say anything like: "he's tweeted his interest in bitcoin" "he's tweeted that bitcoin could be an option and has asked for more suggestions" "he's decided to use bitcoin" stuff like that. |
|
|
|
tvbcof
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4578
Merit: 1276
|
|
July 15, 2012, 08:37:06 PM |
|
This sort of reminds me of the guy who said that the worldwide demand for computers would be four or five, and they guy who decided that 4x10^6 IPv4 addresses should be plenty. ...
There are enough. More than enough, even with rich companies hogging entire address ranges with their class A networks. It's called NAT. ... NAT is the answer to limited IPv4 addresses in a similar way to buses being an answer to not enough automobiles. Buses work fairly well, reduce the pain of lack of transportation, and have some advantageous side effects, but at the end of the day there are some significant annoyances, complications, and lack of flexibility. In network-land these are particularly noticeable today's (hopefully more) p2p-centric environments. Ah well...after several decades IPv6 seems to be gaining some traction. |
sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
|
|
|
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 15, 2012, 08:59:49 PM |
|
So anyway, I've read through this and the articles online and it seems he is completely ignoring the bitcoin suggestions and everyone is ignoring that he is ignoring them. I don't use twitter though. Thoughts on this?
How can he be ignoring those suggestons if he is retweeting them? Have you seen him retweet any other payment provider suggestion besides Bitcoin? He also retweeted Matonis article on Forbes. https://twitter.com/ForbesTech/status/223409880755740672I thought that was forbes, some business news site, not him. Are you saying he owns forbes? I don't see the part from your link where it is him retweeting it. As I said, I don't use twitter so I haven't seen any tweets. But I have seen the forbes article that was tweeted there. My basis for what I am saying comes mainly from this thread, where I have seen no one say anything like: "he's tweeted his interest in bitcoin" "he's tweeted that bitcoin could be an option and has asked for more suggestions" "he's decided to use bitcoin" stuff like that. Press the link that says "27 Retweets" and you'll see him listed there. It's also on his Twitter timeline. You wanted him to take a picture of him jumping and saying "yupiee, bitcoin"? If he decides to use Bitcoin he better keep it for himself. You'll know when he launches his site. If he really thinks Bitcoin is an option I'm sure Twitter won't be the place where he'll do his reasearch. Resuming, you're just talking out of your ass. |
|
|
|
|
|
mokahless
|
|
July 16, 2012, 04:18:51 AM |
|
Press the link that says "27 Retweets" and you'll see him listed there. It's also on his Twitter timeline.
You wanted him to take a picture of him jumping and saying "yupiee, bitcoin"?
If he decides to use Bitcoin he better keep it for himself. You'll know when he launches his site.
If he really thinks Bitcoin is an option I'm sure Twitter won't be the place where he'll do his reasearch.
Resuming, you're just talking out of your ass.
No need to insult me. I'm not talking out of my ass. I am talking as someone who doesn't use twitter. I sincerely apologize if I have offended or annoyed you or somehow seemed argumentative. My only intention was to convey my own understanding and ask for clarification. Can we please be civilized here? Anyway, I don't see a link that says "27 retweets" (even ctrl+f on the page). I assume it's because I don't have a twitter account so probably getting a different kind of page. It's good news he's retweeting then  NAT is the answer to limited IPv4 addresses in a similar way to buses being an answer to not enough automobiles. Buses work fairly well, reduce the pain of lack of transportation, and have some advantageous side effects, but at the end of the day there are some significant annoyances, complications, and lack of flexibility. In network-land these are particularly noticeable today's (hopefully more) p2p-centric environments. Ah well...after several decades IPv6 seems to be gaining some traction.
I'd love a debate but probably don't want to change the topic of this forum. If you want to continue, feel free to pm me. Metaphors are unnecessary (as I am a network engineering student) and I usually find them confusing and distracting. Not to mention the holes in your metaphor. |
|
|
|
tvbcof
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4578
Merit: 1276
|
|
July 16, 2012, 04:31:53 AM |
|
NAT is the answer to limited IPv4 addresses in a similar way to buses being an answer to not enough automobiles. Buses work fairly well, reduce the pain of lack of transportation, and have some advantageous side effects, but at the end of the day there are some significant annoyances, complications, and lack of flexibility. In network-land these are particularly noticeable today's (hopefully more) p2p-centric environments. Ah well...after several decades IPv6 seems to be gaining some traction.
I'd love a debate but probably don't want to change the topic of this forum. If you want to continue, feel free to pm me. Metaphors are unnecessary (as I am a network engineering student) and I usually find them confusing and distracting. Not to mention the holes in your metaphor. I'm not a network engineer, but I play one at work. Most people can figure out how to skim the stuff which doesn't interest them. Go. |
sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
|
|
|
|
Nemesis
|
|
July 16, 2012, 04:46:16 AM |
|
Press the link that says "27 Retweets" and you'll see him listed there. It's also on his Twitter timeline.
You wanted him to take a picture of him jumping and saying "yupiee, bitcoin"?
If he decides to use Bitcoin he better keep it for himself. You'll know when he launches his site.
If he really thinks Bitcoin is an option I'm sure Twitter won't be the place where he'll do his reasearch.
Resuming, you're just talking out of your ass.
No need to insult me. I'm not talking out of my ass. I am talking as someone who doesn't use twitter. I sincerely apologize if I have offended or annoyed you or somehow seemed argumentative. My only intention was to convey my own understanding and ask for clarification. Can we please be civilized here? Anyway, I don't see a link that says "27 retweets" (even ctrl+f on the page). I assume it's because I don't have a twitter account so probably getting a different kind of page. It's good news he's retweeting then NAT is the answer to limited IPv4 addresses in a similar way to buses being an answer to not enough automobiles. Buses work fairly well, reduce the pain of lack of transportation, and have some advantageous side effects, but at the end of the day there are some significant annoyances, complications, and lack of flexibility. In network-land these are particularly noticeable today's (hopefully more) p2p-centric environments. Ah well...after several decades IPv6 seems to be gaining some traction.
I'd love a debate but probably don't want to change the topic of this forum. If you want to continue, feel free to pm me. Metaphors are unnecessary (as I am a network engineering student) and I usually find them confusing and distracting. Not to mention the holes in your metaphor. thats new to me... can i play one? |
|
|
|
|
|
mokahless
|
|
July 16, 2012, 10:26:18 AM |
|
The above comments confuse me. Did I miss something? Anyway, you obviously know a lot from work and I'd probably learn something from a debate with you.
|
|
|
|
mrb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027
|
|
July 16, 2012, 11:34:20 AM |
|
There are enough. More than enough, even with rich companies hogging entire address ranges with their class A networks. It's called NAT.
http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=48 |
|
|
|
|
|
World
|
|
July 20, 2012, 07:53:45 PM |
|
From@KimDotcom Hi @BarackObama, here is a song for you #MrPresident. Regards, The Internet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MokNvbiRqCM&feature=player_embeddedhttp://kim.com/ |
Supporting people with beautiful creative ideas. Bitcoin is because of the developers,exchanges,merchants,miners,investors,users,machines and blockchain technologies work together.
|
|
|
herzmeister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 20, 2012, 09:33:28 PM |
|
wow he wants to save the world.  and no mention of bitcoin still  |
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
July 20, 2012, 09:51:24 PM |
|
I must say I hate the song. The lyrics are weak, the music is lame, the FX are just plain annoying, and it's just generally terrible. But if that's what it takes.... I won't stand in the way.
|
|
|
|
|
World
|
|
August 03, 2012, 04:49:27 PM |
|
he is active on Facebook ,let's be his friend and teach him about BTC https://www.facebook.com/MegaKimDotcom |
Supporting people with beautiful creative ideas. Bitcoin is because of the developers,exchanges,merchants,miners,investors,users,machines and blockchain technologies work together.
|
|
|
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 03, 2012, 04:57:29 PM |
|
I think that's a fake profile...  |
|
|
|
|
|
World
|
|
August 03, 2012, 06:16:30 PM |
|
|
Supporting people with beautiful creative ideas. Bitcoin is because of the developers,exchanges,merchants,miners,investors,users,machines and blockchain technologies work together.
|
|
|
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 03, 2012, 06:19:15 PM |
|
Then it's probably real  Looks so empty, besides wall comments from people who friended him lol |
|
|
|
|
|
World
|
|
August 28, 2012, 06:00:38 PM |
|
KimDotcom looking Developers http://twitter.com/KimDotcomDevelopers of up/download & file managers, email & fax tools, VOIP & video apps please email twitter@kim.com for early API access. |
Supporting people with beautiful creative ideas. Bitcoin is because of the developers,exchanges,merchants,miners,investors,users,machines and blockchain technologies work together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
