Bitcoin Forum
November 24, 2017, 09:46:26 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Could JS Bitcoin Mining Replace Google's Adsense?  (Read 5879 times)
IIOII
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1101



View Profile WWW
June 06, 2011, 10:53:33 PM
 #21

I currently do JS mining... but  I do viral CPA marketing using content blockers.. the user is on my money page for 30 seconds to a minute usually.  Most my money is made from the offers they complete, so the JS miner is just for that extra kick.  I'm averaging over 300users online every minute.  To lazy to do the math but it does create shares and does work with big numbers as a extra source of income.

I would never put it on a "legit" site though.

How many MHashes per second does that represent, roughly?

Would like to know as well.

Join ICO Now A blockchain platform for effective freelancing
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511516786
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511516786

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511516786
Reply with quote  #2

1511516786
Report to moderator
1511516786
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511516786

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511516786
Reply with quote  #2

1511516786
Report to moderator
TiagoTiago
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


Firstbits.com/1fg4i :)


View Profile
June 07, 2011, 12:22:31 AM
 #22

It doesn't necessarily replaces ads, but  it can compete with them under some circumstances, each approach to passive money making has it's pros and cons.

(I dont always get new reply notifications, pls send a pm when you think it has happened)

Wanna gimme some BTC/BCH for any or no reason? 1FmvtS66LFh6ycrXDwKRQTexGJw4UWiqDX Smiley

The more you believe in Bitcoin, and the more you show you do to other people, the faster the real value will soar!

Do you like mmmBananas?!
Geremia
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 460


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2016, 12:24:19 AM
 #23

I know this is a very old thread, but since then, concepts like sidechaining, the Lightning net, etc., have been developed since 2011.

If blockchain tech takes over more, Google will die because Google is centralized and blockchain tech is decentralized.

Since Google processes about 50k transactions per second (~a trillion / year) in its ad tracking campaign (far more than all the major credit cards combined), there's no way that with current tech this could be done on the Bitcoin mainchain. Hence, sidechaining would be necessary.

BTC tip jar | my BTC wiki, BTC StackExchange, & Twister posts pages | Tox ID: 65C3E8810738AD9D175234808FCB317A1103632903436203D45411AE97C03F54C34861AB6663
Join Kraken. | The best, free book on Bitcoin: Mastering Bitcoin
Nos cum prole pia benedicat Virgo Maria.
0xfff
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224


View Profile
June 25, 2016, 01:51:54 AM
 #24

I know this is a very old thread, but since then, concepts like sidechaining, the Lightning net, etc., have been developed since 2011.

If blockchain tech takes over more, Google will die because Google is centralized and blockchain tech is decentralized.

Since Google processes about 50k transactions per second (~a trillion / year) in its ad tracking campaign (far more than all the major credit cards combined), there's no way that with current tech this could be done on the Bitcoin mainchain. Hence, sidechaining would be necessary.

This is one hell of a grave dig. Wouldn't a pool be responsible for processing those transactions for work? I don't see how that would impact the blockchain.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!