Overview of Popular Bitcoin Gambling Websites [Up-to-date as of 8th Nov '15]

[Mitchell]

I also used Mitchell's layout from his Overview of Signature Campaigns thread, with his permission. Cheers mate!

No problem and good luck. It looks great, buddy!

[1713290036]

1713290036

[1713290036]

1713290036

[DiamondCardz]

I also used Mitchell's layout from his Overview of Signature Campaigns thread, with his permission. Cheers mate!

No problem and good luck. It looks great, buddy!

Cheers! Much appreciated.

[casinobitco]

https://CasinoBitco.in established in 2013, which is publicly traded on Havelock, and it's other Properties - Bit777.com and PeerBet.org (one of the longest running dice sites in the business) isn't on here?


OK

[cloudbets]

What about PartyPonzi, WeeklyPonzi, LotteryPonzi... etcetc

Lol, I'm joking. It's a good list, someone should have done this a long time ago. You should add SealsWithClubs too.

Yeap.. many ponzi stay at our site now T.T.. many chance to lose or win our money
Cryptowin is my choice now

Take a look at www.bitnety.com. I am on the btc list! looks best fair ponzi for me

[DiamondCardz]

Note that this is a new thread, and I have likely missed a few Gambling Websites. Please use the submit form to report them to me!

https://CasinoBitco.in established in 2014, which is publicly traded on Havelock, and it's other Properties - Bit777.com and PeerBet.org (one of the longest running dice sites in the business) isn't on here?


OK

All you had to do was ask. I'll add you shortly. No need to be a bit of a dick about it, though.

If you read the thread, it does state I add gambling sites with a bitcointalk thread size of 25+ pages, so you should be on there. You should probably be able to draw from that, that I simply missed you out by accident...

[amacar]

You should add dooglus's Just-Dice

[DiamondCardz]

Added CasinoBitco.in with an A rating.

amacar: Of course! How could I forget...I'll get to it ASAP.

Edit: I haven't checked JD in a while, but it would seem it is not a Bitcoin Gambling site anymore and rather gambles an altcoin. So I won't be adding it to the list, sorry.

[amacar]

My bad, didn't see that this is bitcoin only. Sorry for the inconvenience.

[BitcoinPriest]

If you need a list with gambling sites, check my website, we have 100+ gambling sites added, so you can choose which ones you missed so far. http://bitcoinpriest.com/

[DiamondCardz]

If you need a list with gambling sites, check my website, we have 100+ gambling sites added, so you can choose which ones you missed so far. http://bitcoinpriest.com/

This is less of a general list, and more of a list of the more major/popular Bitcoin Gambling Websites, though. However it could still be a help to me, so thanks!

[mocacinno]

amazing PD comunity is number 1..cool 
is the best site gambling PD 

[24HourPonzi.com]

Loving the bias on WeeklyPonzi. Just because it's a ponzi game doesn't instantly make it untrustworthy. If you ask any of my users they will tell you that I'm an honest guy. I've had many chances to run with 100+ BTC in my wallet yet I continued to uphold the trust of the site. Yesterday I also seeded the round with 20 BTC directly from my own personal wallet. Maybe take the time to actually analyse the game before seeing "ponzi" and labelling it a scam straight up. There used to be a thing called "journalistic integrity". Not anymore I suppose.

Thanks.

[Quartx]

If you are going to put ref links, at least let people know they are ref links instead of hiding them in goo.gl urls...

[DiamondCardz]

If you are going to put ref links, at least let people know they are ref links instead of hiding them in goo.gl urls...

Did I not add a Disclaimer? I must have forgot, my bad. They're not all ref links though, they're all covered in goo.gl just so I can track click statistics.

24HourPonzi.com: It's a Ponzi. Ponzis are not trustworthy. Simple.

[sho_road_warrior]

Loving the bias on WeeklyPonzi. Just because it's a ponzi game doesn't instantly make it untrustworthy.
-snip-

I think this discussion is moot here. It might be a good idea for someone heavily into the ponzi game scene to make a similar list. To offer guidance. While I personally am not convinced that there is a single honest ponzi game out  there and thus agree with DiamondCardz, I am probably biased as well.

Coinichiwa doesn't seem massively popular yet, but I'll check them out.

Believe me, as a PrimeDice mod (I did put this in the disclaimer) I know. But it's only one game, remember.

Do you some sort of system to determine the popularity of a certain site or do you just go by your gut feeling? Nevermind, found the smallprint...

-snip-
 Ponzis are not trustworthy. Simple.

Since you are biased and IMHO rightfully so I think its best to leave ponzis out in general. You could add a disclaimer that you are not willing to add a ponzi game/hyip or any form of gambling that works in a similar fashion. Something like the description theymos used for the proposed new section.

-snip-

Investor-based games
Games where the main factor is whether or not new "investors" join the game. Also any Bitcoin-denominated investment product with an APR of 15% or more, which are similarly risky even if they're not actually paying interest using investor deposits.

-snip-

While I understand where you are coming from with your rating I also think that these overviews should have a higher standard of neutrality.

[DiamondCardz]

Yeah, I originally wasn't going to include Ponzis but changed my mind. I might revise that soon once I've thought about it.

[DiamondCardz]

OP updated. Changes:

- Added AnoniBet with an A- rating.

[Melds]

So pocketrocketscasino, who has handled thousands of btc, done thousands in withdrawals gets B- in trust because of a bitter snail seller over his affiliates? which was canceled because he took over a domain similar to PRC and called it scam? Legit.

[DiamondCardz]

So pocketrocketscasino, who has handled thousands of btc, done thousands in withdrawals gets B- in trust because of a bitter snail seller over his affiliates? which was canceled because he took over a domain similar to PRC and called it scam? Legit.

I was actually contacted by PRC. This was my reply.

I may review your trustworthiness status at a later date. B- is not the end of the world. However do try to resolve your trust with BAC rather than sitting there and letting it lie.

I disagree that you should be A+ and it seems kind of off for you to just PM me claiming you're the most trusted site operator. If you resolve that negative trust, your trustworthiness will go up.

If efforts are at least publicly made to resolve that (or if there have been and proof can be shown to me), I'll bump the Trustworthiness up.

[Melds]

I was actually contacted by PRC. This was my reply.

I may review your trustworthiness status at a later date. B- is not the end of the world. However do try to resolve your trust with BAC rather than sitting there and letting it lie.

I disagree that you should be A+ and it seems kind of off for you to just PM me claiming you're the most trusted site operator. If you resolve that negative trust, your trustworthiness will go up.

So a guy that is mod at a COMPETING site, which tried to label PRC a scam because he's a bitter child, has to work it out with Dean? Right. Maybe Dean should "buy" some worthless btctalk trust like everyone else.