Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 11:39:00 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Is the p2p aspect of bitcoin important? (!!PLEASE READ POST BEFORE VOTING!!)
Yes, absoulutly
Yes, but not vital
I really don't care
No, not very
No, not at all
Your premise is flawed

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Is p2p important?  (Read 2001 times)
Transisto
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624



View Profile WWW
July 12, 2012, 07:29:19 AM
 #21

This poll is inspired by a debate I had on another thread recently.
...

Could you add a link to the thread in question ?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480765140
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480765140

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480765140
Reply with quote  #2

1480765140
Report to moderator
1480765140
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480765140

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480765140
Reply with quote  #2

1480765140
Report to moderator
Meni Rosenfeld
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890



View Profile WWW
July 12, 2012, 11:25:15 AM
 #22

This poll is inspired by a debate I had on another thread recently.
...

Could you add a link to the thread in question ?
Probably this one.

1EofoZNBhWQ3kxfKnvWkhtMns4AivZArhr   |   Who am I?   |   bitcoin-otc WoT
Bitcoil - Exchange bitcoins for ILS (thread)   |   Israel Bitcoin community homepage (thread)
Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems (thread, summary)  |   PureMining - Infinite-term, deterministic mining bond
yogi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 947


Hamster ate my bitcoin


View Profile
July 12, 2012, 06:09:05 PM
 #23

This poll is inspired by a debate I had on another thread recently.
...

Could you add a link to the thread in question ?
Probably this one.

Hi Meni,

Yep, that's the thread I was referring too.

The first page and a half is talking about the size of the blockchain which I agree there is a solution too. The rest of the thread talk about other potential problems of scaling.

bpd
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114


View Profile
July 12, 2012, 07:10:05 PM
 #24

I don't think it's a problem. People can form co-ops to run a single node, providing electrum or other similar access for co-op members. Others might run nodes and offer lightweight client access to subscribers for a small fee. It's the open protocol, and open access to the network that's important.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


www.bitpools.com


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2012, 07:21:33 PM
 #25

I think the Federal Reserve should be the central authority for the blockchain.

http://www.bitpools.com
Pool your bitcoins with others. Vote on solutions using the Bitcoin blockchain. Keep your bitcoins in your cold storage until you find a solution you like.
Links and Reviews of useful every day places to spend bitcoins: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=943143.0
Rassah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624


Director of Bitcoin100


View Profile
July 12, 2012, 07:58:32 PM
 #26

Bigger cheaper storage AND eventual switch to open source mesh networking will likely keep issues at bay.

swissmate
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile
July 12, 2012, 07:59:56 PM
 #27

I think the Federal Reserve should be the central authority for the blockchain.

Decentralized currency.

Bitcoin adress:1HtrosDCEM3zMJ1RbsK9g4vpe3DTotBhVh


Need any translation?
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!