Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 01:29:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
  Print  
Author Topic: 1DkyBEKt5S2GDtv7aQw6rQepAvnsRyHoYM  (Read 85653 times)
bitcoinBull
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1001


rippleFanatic


View Profile
September 05, 2012, 07:23:01 AM
 #481

Next, I also find it amusing that everyone is assuming that this address belongs to Pirate. In fact, some quick analysis on my part seems to show otherwise. It's most likely Silk Road.

I can do better than that. I can prove it belongs to Silk Road by transactions I moved in there and subsequently out of there, but since anyone can do so without breaking any laws, I'll refrain from going into detail and let someone else do the dirty work of "proving" it. I'll admit I don't really know much about Silk Road, but I was able to at least discern this from the short time I moved coin in and subsequently out.

I really am starting to think that a significant number of Bitcoiners are just remaining comfortably numb regarding the impact and sway that Silk Road has on Bitcoin price. I don't know why, though. Plus, it seems like the ultimate free mixer, they don't charge even a Bitpenny and you can be assured you have completely cleaned your coin. Well, "cleaned" it by at least assuring it can't be tied to your online identity, not really "cleaned" it by separating it from possible association with illegal activity.

I still maintain that it is most likely an MtGox address. I bet if you look at previous MtGox deposits/withdrawlals, you will find it taints MtGox transactions just as much, if not more, than SR transactions. Its impossible to do more analysis until there's more activity (last send transaction was 8/17/2012).

College of Bucking Bulls Knowledge
1714008560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714008560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714008560
Reply with quote  #2

1714008560
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714008560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714008560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714008560
Reply with quote  #2

1714008560
Report to moderator
ErebusBat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500

I am the one who knocks


View Profile
September 05, 2012, 12:36:19 PM
 #482

Next, I also find it amusing that everyone is assuming that this address belongs to Pirate. In fact, some quick analysis on my part seems to show otherwise. It's most likely Silk Road.

I can do better than that. I can prove it belongs to Silk Road by transactions I moved in there and subsequently out of there, but since anyone can do so without breaking any laws, I'll refrain from going into detail and let someone else do the dirty work of "proving" it. I'll admit I don't really know much about Silk Road, but I was able to at least discern this from the short time I moved coin in and subsequently out.

I really am starting to think that a significant number of Bitcoiners are just remaining comfortably numb regarding the impact and sway that Silk Road has on Bitcoin price. I don't know why, though. Plus, it seems like the ultimate free mixer, they don't charge even a Bitpenny and you can be assured you have completely cleaned your coin. Well, "cleaned" it by at least assuring it can't be tied to your online identity, not really "cleaned" it by separating it from possible association with illegal activity.

I still maintain that it is most likely an MtGox address. I bet if you look at previous MtGox deposits/withdrawlals, you will find it taints MtGox transactions just as much, if not more, than SR transactions. Its impossible to do more analysis until there's more activity (last send transaction was 8/17/2012).

How do you explain dooglus' findings?

░▒▓█ Coinroll.it - 1% House Edge Dice Game █▓▒░ • Coinroll Thread • *FREE* 100 BTC Raffle

Signup for CEX.io BitFury exchange and get GHS Instantly!  Don't wait for shipping, mine NOW!
sadpandatech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 05, 2012, 01:21:29 PM
 #483

I think its clear that Micon is a scammer. Last night I was at a table at sealswithclubs.eu with over 50k chips (50btc) and he sat down and took it all within a couple of hours. Straight up ruthless thief. GIVE ME MY MONEY BACK MICON.

LOL. I dislike Micon as much as the next guy. But, umm, he is quite the poker player form what I hear. Did he do something other than win hands to make you believe he was cheating?

If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA

It is being worked on by smart people.  -DamienBlack
humanitee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 05, 2012, 02:09:37 PM
 #484

That's some pretty blatant sarcasm.

▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
▄███▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄ █▄▄
▄▄          ▀▀████▄  ██▄
█████▄            ▀█████  ██▄
▄█████████           ▀█████ ███▄
▄█████████▀▀           ▀█████ ███▄
▄███  █████             ▀█████ ████
███  █████                █████ ████
███ █████                  ████  ████
███ █████                ▄████  ████
███ █████                ███████████
▀██ █████▄                █████████
▀██ ██████▄                ▀█████
▀██ ███████                  ▀▀▀
▀██ ██████▄▄                 
▀██ ██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀
▀▀ █████████████████▀
▀▀▀██████▀▀▀▀

Fast, Secure, and Fully

DecentralizeTrading
BACKED BY:
─────────────────────────
BINANCE
─────── LAB
&█████████████████████████████████ █  ███
█▀    ▀█  ███▀▀▀▀▀████████  ████▀▀███▀ █
█  █████    ▄▄▄▄▄  █  ▀  █    ███  █  ██
█▄    ▀█  ██       █  ▄███  ██████   ███
█████  █  ██  ███  █  ████  ████  ▄  ███
█▄    ▄█▄  ▄█▄     ▀  ████▄  ▄█   ██  ██
████████████████████████████████████████


  Whitepaper
 Medium
Reddit
Raize
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1419
Merit: 1015


View Profile
September 05, 2012, 02:14:32 PM
Last edit: September 05, 2012, 05:16:30 PM by Raize
 #485

(last send transaction was 8/17/2012).

One set of 100,000 was broken into a 60k BTC branch and a 40 BTC branch:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Hcs1e7iaMp1gvm5mypZsqVa6ncpcfiCcm

The 40k Branch, first spinoff:
https://blockchain.info/address/1K7KkP3mCsZUEDT7MuQqDpUgLgUbeLzLCA

Second spinoff:
https://blockchain.info/address/18Hs8cqQXkz8r2yBMLyFgYdCf7oj343w7B

Third:
https://blockchain.info/address/1DASVnie9amHLM7vgiiLTxYEefzx63XTmV

Fourth:
https://blockchain.info/address/192AgengM4FGGuDV8g6giFMWXhrzeGqTXr

Get the idea yet?

Now, move coin into Silk Road and immediately back out. Then look at where your "payment" comes from, go up and down the chain three or four links to get the idea of what is paying you. It's the same payout mechanism, it just rolls around and spits out money. If you bother to take the time to go through the blockchain you'll be able to confirm this is likely Silk Road's money. Some of it coalesces back into large wallets again, some of it does not. It's a great free mixing service, if that's what you truly want out of Silk Road. Given their clientele, I assume that service is necessary, but not what they are coming there for.

It may well end up being that -- just like its cash counterpart having traces of coke-- nearly every Bitcoin will someday have traces back to a Silk Road address. I'm not sure every Bitcoiner will care, but you ought to know this for the implications it may have in the future..
Sitarow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047



View Profile
September 05, 2012, 05:08:58 PM
 #486

(last send transaction was 8/17/2012).

One set of 100,000 was broken into a 60k BTC branch and a 40 BTC branch:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Hcs1e7iaMp1gvm5mypZsqVa6ncpcfiCcm

The 40k Branch, first spinoff:
https://blockchain.info/address/1K7KkP3mCsZUEDT7MuQqDpUgLgUbeLzLCA

Second spinoff:
https://blockchain.info/address/18Hs8cqQXkz8r2yBMLyFgYdCf7oj343w7B

Third:
https://blockchain.info/address/1DASVnie9amHLM7vgiiLTxYEefzx63XTmV

Fourth:
https://blockchain.info/address/192AgengM4FGGuDV8g6giFMWXhrzeGqTXr

Get the idea yet?

Now, move coin into Silk Road and immediately back out. Then look at where your "payment" comes from, go up and down the chain three or four links to get the idea of what is paying you. It's the same payout mechanism, it just rolls around and spits out money. If you bother to take the time to go through the blockchain you'll be able to confirm this is likely Silk Road's money. Some of it coalesces back into large wallets again, some of it does not. It's a great free mixing service, if that's what you truly want out of Silk Road. Given their clientele, I assume that service is necessary, but not what they are coming there for.

It may well end up being that -- just like its cash counterpart having traces of crack -- nearly every Bitcoin will someday have traces back to a Silk Road address in the future. I'm not sure every Bitcoiner will care, but you should ought to know this for the implications it may have.

I know of 5000 BTC that will never ever be traced back to silk road. Sad
ErebusBat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500

I am the one who knocks


View Profile
September 05, 2012, 06:42:49 PM
 #487

I know of 5000 BTC that will never ever be traced back to silk road. Sad
Huh

░▒▓█ Coinroll.it - 1% House Edge Dice Game █▓▒░ • Coinroll Thread • *FREE* 100 BTC Raffle

Signup for CEX.io BitFury exchange and get GHS Instantly!  Don't wait for shipping, mine NOW!
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
September 06, 2012, 04:54:02 PM
 #488

I know of 5000 BTC that will never ever be traced back to silk road. Sad

because someone lost them? In that case it could be argued they are not even bitcoins any more.

Or maybe because you are sitting on them? In that case: are you sure?

PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0  3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
gbl08ma
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250


Donations: http://tny.im/nx


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2012, 04:59:21 PM
 #489

I know of 5000 BTC that will never ever be traced back to silk road. Sad

because someone lost them? In that case it could be argued they are not even bitcoins any more.

Or maybe because you are sitting on them? In that case: are you sure?

If he mined/knows of someone who mined 5000 BTC and never spent them, then he can be sure the coins can't be traced to silk road.

notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
September 06, 2012, 06:03:38 PM
 #490

I know of 5000 BTC that will never ever be traced back to silk road. Sad

because someone lost them? In that case it could be argued they are not even bitcoins any more.

Or maybe because you are sitting on them? In that case: are you sure?

If he mined/knows of someone who mined 5000 BTC and never spent them, then he can be sure the coins can't be traced to silk road.

If someone had them, never ever couldn't be guaranteed unless they don't spend them before silk road goes away.  Having coins you can't spend is kind of useless.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
Spekulatius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 07, 2012, 06:22:02 PM
 #491

There just was a tx with total output 2000 BTC, that includes 1,999,999.95 BTC in fees.

Guess where it went to:  SATOSHI DICE!!
It is the 50/50 address of satoshidice.com

tx:  6f3317c124186027a3c4c04d50c7e73c663aa1c5e04ec2153a2e29f521ccab1a
receiving address: 1dice97ECuByXAvqXpaYzSaQuPVvrtmz6
gbl08ma
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 306
Merit: 250


Donations: http://tny.im/nx


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2012, 06:24:53 PM
 #492

There just was a tx with total output 2000 BTC, that includes 1,999,999.95 BTC in fees.

Guess where it went to:  SATOSHI DICE!!
It is the 50/50 address of satoshidice.com

tx:  6f3317c124186027a3c4c04d50c7e73c663aa1c5e04ec2153a2e29f521ccab1a
receiving address: 1dice97ECuByXAvqXpaYzSaQuPVvrtmz6

Nice trolling.

Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002



View Profile
September 07, 2012, 06:25:45 PM
 #493

There just was a tx with total output 2000 BTC, that includes 1,999,999.95 BTC in fees.

Guess where it went to:  SATOSHI DICE!!
It is the 50/50 address of satoshidice.com

tx:  6f3317c124186027a3c4c04d50c7e73c663aa1c5e04ec2153a2e29f521ccab1a
receiving address: 1dice97ECuByXAvqXpaYzSaQuPVvrtmz6

Nope...
Tx ID: http://blockchain.info/tx/4d6c2f0045f4b4f824fc47b5e1fd429c525465cf1bd5fb9745f6b15c21cfefe0
From: http://blockchain.info/address/16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT
Value: 20,000 BTC
Spekulatius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 07, 2012, 06:26:16 PM
 #494

Lol, it keeps getting funnier! Now there was a

21 MIO BTC transaction just now !!! (still unconfirmed)

tx:  bb0035f8b02f7e716d14a90505ffdf00e4b71a3e6030c41abebf7129915bd42a
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2012, 06:26:36 PM
 #495

There just was a tx with total output 2000 BTC, that includes 1,999,999.95 BTC in fees.

Guess where it went to:  SATOSHI DICE!!
It is the 50/50 address of satoshidice.com

tx:  6f3317c124186027a3c4c04d50c7e73c663aa1c5e04ec2153a2e29f521ccab1a
receiving address: 1dice97ECuByXAvqXpaYzSaQuPVvrtmz6

lol

i cant seem to see this 1,999,999.95 BTC in fees.

can you make it easy for us and point it out

adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2012, 06:27:19 PM
 #496

There just was a tx with total output 2000 BTC, that includes 1,999,999.95 BTC in fees.

Guess where it went to:  SATOSHI DICE!!
It is the 50/50 address of satoshidice.com

tx:  6f3317c124186027a3c4c04d50c7e73c663aa1c5e04ec2153a2e29f521ccab1a
receiving address: 1dice97ECuByXAvqXpaYzSaQuPVvrtmz6

Nope...
Tx ID: http://blockchain.info/tx/4d6c2f0045f4b4f824fc47b5e1fd429c525465cf1bd5fb9745f6b15c21cfefe0
From: http://blockchain.info/address/16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT
Value: 20,000 BTC

that says 0BTC fees

adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2012, 06:27:40 PM
 #497

Lol, it keeps getting funnier! Now there was a

21 MIO BTC transaction just now !!! (still unconfirmed)

tx:  bb0035f8b02f7e716d14a90505ffdf00e4b71a3e6030c41abebf7129915bd42a

BS...

http://blockchain.info/tx/bb0035f8b02f7e716d14a90505ffdf00e4b71a3e6030c41abebf7129915bd42a

"Transaction not found"

Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002



View Profile
September 07, 2012, 06:28:38 PM
 #498

There just was a tx with total output 2000 BTC, that includes 1,999,999.95 BTC in fees.

Guess where it went to:  SATOSHI DICE!!
It is the 50/50 address of satoshidice.com

tx:  6f3317c124186027a3c4c04d50c7e73c663aa1c5e04ec2153a2e29f521ccab1a
receiving address: 1dice97ECuByXAvqXpaYzSaQuPVvrtmz6

Nope...
Tx ID: http://blockchain.info/tx/4d6c2f0045f4b4f824fc47b5e1fd429c525465cf1bd5fb9745f6b15c21cfefe0
From: http://blockchain.info/address/16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT
Value: 20,000 BTC

that says 0BTC fees

Yup.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2012, 06:29:35 PM
 #499

  Roll Eyes Spekulatius is posting BS to try to get the price to crash?

Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002



View Profile
September 07, 2012, 06:30:26 PM
 #500

  Roll Eyes Spekulatius is posting BS to try to get the price to crash?

That should work... NOT! Roll Eyes
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!