Did the Pirate Ponzi fiasco stunt the growth of Litecoin?

[smoothie]

Pirate stunted the growth of litecoin downwards. meaning upwards growth is in full play.

[1713959709]

1713959709

[1713959709]

1713959709

[crazy_rabbit]

So It's been about two years and I though now was a good time to revisit this.

Of course in the meantime Litecoin hit the moon and then crashed and burned, but the original premise of this question- especially considering how Litecoin has had so little development for a long time now- I think is still valid.

What do people think 2 years on?

[kelsey]

So It's been about two years and I though now was a good time to revisit this.

Of course in the meantime Litecoin hit the moon and then crashed and burned, but the original premise of this question- especially considering how Litecoin has had so little development for a long time now- I think is still valid.

What do people think 2 years on?

i think the past that far back (in crypto terms) holds little relevance to now, eg mt gox collapse will have little influence over anything bitcoin 2 years from now (except when media beat ups re hash it in future scams and crashes).

[smoothie]

Summary: when you posted this thread LTC was $0.10 or less.

Now it is $1.70.

Seems like a growing market.

[Melbustus]

Summary: when you posted this thread LTC was $0.10 or less.

Now it is $1.70.

Seems like a growing market.

Wait another 2 years.

[crazy_rabbit]

Summary: when you posted this thread LTC was $0.10 or less.

Now it is $1.70.

Seems like a growing market.

True, so is bitcoin. Fair enough. Although I was quite surprised to hear Coblee saying that litecoin doesn't need development right now. He argued his position well on it, but it still seems like maybe he just has no reason to develop it.

But yeah, 0.10 to 1.70 is great growth. We have to keep that in mind for bitcoin too! :-)

[420]

why the hell litecoin doesn't need dev now?

[BitMos]

why the hell litecoin doesn't need dev now?

effectively you miss some events    .