DannyMaddox locks the thread just like BCX would

[smoothie]

Coincidence?


I think not...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=96169.0

[1714029650]

1714029650

[bitlane]

How is it, that after both members (which many people have monitored all day) have been absent from the forum for the past 7+ Hours......


SUDDENLY SHOW UP WITHIN MINUTES OF EACH OTHER ?
(Times shown are MST, My Local/Forum Time)

[smoothie]

BCX and DannyMaddox awfully quiet. 

[bitlane]

BCX and DannyMaddox awfully quiet. 

It's obvious this is being ran from a single-computer operation, so you may need to address them 1 at a time, so there is proper notice in place for WHO needs to be signed into to WHAT Forum Profile......

[pekv2]

How is it, that after both members (which many people have monitored all day) have been absent from the forum for the past 7+ Hours......


SUDDENLY SHOW UP WITHIN MINUTES OF EACH OTHER ?
(Times shown are MST, My Local/Forum Time)

Yes you blathering moron, You signed in a soon you saw me come on line.

Another prime example of you Producing instant evidence supporting your heroic antics to defend justice.

Once again you're the guy that sets a fire and shows up to save everyone.

It's time for you to go fuck off......

Maybe? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91958.0

[bitlane]

Yes you blathering moron, You signed in a soon you saw me come on line.

Another prime example of you Producing instant evidence supporting your heroic antics to defend justice.

Once again you're the guy that sets a fire and shows up to save everyone.

AAwww...and after that heart-felt PM that you sent to me this morning, asking me to keep things private, I had thought we were finally making progress.

Does this mean we can't be friends after all Danny ?

Why is it that DannyMaddox and BitcoinEXpress can not be ONLINE at the same time ?

Thankfully, it only takes a SINGLE FORUM ADMIN to confirm if there is a problem. Dial-Up Internet keep disconnecting ?

[smoothie]

Yes you blathering moron, You signed in a soon you saw me come on line.

Another prime example of you Producing instant evidence supporting your heroic antics to defend justice.

Once again you're the guy that sets a fire and shows up to save everyone.

AAwww...and after that heart-felt PM that you sent to me this morning, asking me to keep things private, I had thought we were finally making progress.

Does this mean we can't be friends after all Danny ?

Why is it that DannyMaddox and BitcoinEXpress can not be ONLINE at the same time ?

Thankfully, it only takes a SINGLE FORUM ADMIN to confirm if there is a problem. Dial-Up Internet keep disconnecting ?

PM?....Care to share?

[smoothie]

One of them is always offline when the other is online. LOL

at least use two computers...

[Raoul Duke]

One of them is always offline when the other is online. LOL

at least use two computers...

Or 2 browsers, but that's way too advanced.
Don't worry. Mr. Maddox went away for good. Now just his female alter-ego will be around.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=96169.msg1061271#msg1061271

[bitlane]

Or 2 browsers, but that's way too advanced.
Don't worry. Mr. Maddox went away for good. Now just his female alter-ego will be around.

You do realize, if THAT is the case, then BitcoinEXpress is not only pretending to be a woman, but a lesbian at the same time.



...a WIFE....huh ?

[k9quaint]

One of them is always offline when the other is online. LOL

at least use two computers...

If a mod could verify that both accounts logged from the same IP, that would be evidence.
Otherwise, I would expect at least one to be using a proxy.

Edit: bad grammar 

[smoothie]

One of them is always offline when the other is online. LOL

at least use two computers...

If a mod could verify that both accounts logged from the same IP, that would be evidence.
Otherwise, I would expect at least one to using a proxy.

+1 MODS can one of you verify if this is or isn't true?

[smoothie]

Yes you blathering moron, You signed in a soon you saw me come on line.

Another prime example of you Producing instant evidence supporting your heroic antics to defend justice.

Once again you're the guy that sets a fire and shows up to save everyone.

AAwww...and after that heart-felt PM that you sent to me this morning, asking me to keep things private, I had thought we were finally making progress.

Does this mean we can't be friends after all Danny ?

Why is it that DannyMaddox and BitcoinEXpress can not be ONLINE at the same time ?

Thankfully, it only takes a SINGLE FORUM ADMIN to confirm if there is a problem. Dial-Up Internet keep disconnecting ?

You have no clue how this forum works do you? I know for a fact that when DannyMaddox aka Bitlane was online it was from a different IP because I know I'm not that person online as DannyMaddox.



While I always thought you were a straight up asshole, this whole event has opened the fact that you have no clue on the advanced workings of LTC or BTC, do not comprehend a 51% attack at all, cannot interpret simple data graphs and have a strong desire to be a "Super Hero". You sound a whole lot lie Bulanula.


Like it or not asshole, this whole LTC attack was a coordinated event with Coblee's full knowledge to protect Litecoin and nothing more. In spite of you trying to fuck things up and keep people in the pools and play super detective it succeeded.

Good things came of this as we are now aware that a 51% prevention needs to be hard coded in. I will not be going to jail because I did nothing in violation of any laws period. The EC2 required to bump up the hash rate was paid for and in complete compliance with EC2 TOS.

I will continue to mine LTC and I will continue to be here, so from the bottom of my heart FUCK YOU and it doesn't matter what you say because you're on ignore LOL....

Who won, LTC did that's who

~BCX~

Wow lots of honesty I read out of that last post. You sound really butt hurt. 

[bitlane]

I know for a fact that when DannyMaddox aka Bitlane was online it was from a different IP because I know I'm not that person online as DannyMaddox.

Well, THAT solves THAT.
At this point, I don't see any reason why we shouldn't simply take your word, because if you know that person is not you, then that is good enough for me.
CASE CLOSED.

[illpoet]

damn since the orig thread got locked i'll post my reply in this one.   The OP of the locked thread rang of some truth.  The impression i got was that bcx was projecting himself onto "paul holcomb" in order to distance himself from "danny maddox".  I wouldn't be surprised if he were actually stalking a random asian woman from the internet.  I'm not real sure the facebook page danny maddox is him tho, the page doesn't give me the impression that thats rlly him, mostly bc it doesn't have any epeen on it.   anyway, what happens when you fake 51 attack a philipino lady?

[bitlane]

probably nothing good 

Hey.....

Did Litecoin Win ?

[bitlane]

Yes retard it did and judging by the amount of PM's I've received, a lot of people are thankful and indeed do see a need for a hard coded 51% protection schema.

Exactly. How could I be so blind as to the current state of things and completely overlook the out pour of support for you, from the community at large.... and what you have accomplished over the last few days. It's quite silly of me actually.

Which Forum Profile were those PMs sent to ?

Did you answer them from the DannyMaddox account ? or the BitcoinEXpress account ?

[bitlane]

Thanks ....

Well, I for one would personally like to commend you for your efforts, as this couldn't have been an easy undertaking.....all for the good of Litecoin.

From Multiple personalities, forum accounts, Facebook profiles to alleged bomb threats and child wellfare concerns, yet you still found the time to help the block chain by galvanizing it with a little bit of elbow grease and some Amazon EC2 power at your disposal.

For this, I thank you good sir.

I'm not gonna lie.... I am quite impressed that you were able to 'hold it together' for as long as you have and are still standing tall and sticking to your guns...
(those big, greasy, TRANSPARENT guns....)
THAT is TRUE commitment.


Good for you !

[bitlane]

I think I just realized something. Once the smoke cleared from all of the turmoil, something suddenly became very evident to me....

It's come to my attention that Litecoin, in it's early stages of adoption, may in fact be susceptible to a 51% attack.

Clearly, this is unacceptable and we should all do our parts to help in any way we can. ......by any means necessary.

Because of this unforeseen and inherent flaw, I have been led to believe that the SolidCoin Development Team may have very well stumbled upon the road to a proper solution with SolidCoin 2.0's infrastructure and it's defense against 51% attacks of it's block chain.

NOW, if we could only convince THOSE WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH A SOLUTION TO HELP, we may very well be on our way to a secure cryptocurrency.

Remember folks..... the end will justify the means and by any means necessary, we need to ensure that Litecoin WINS.

Sincerely,
bitlane

[disclaimer201]

Hard-coding a protection against a 51% attack defeats the whole purpose of a decentralized currency. This is absolutely not what is needed. If it were to happen and the actual features of ltc changed as they were changed for scamcoins, a lot of people would leave ltc, including me. Blowhimselfhardexpress is and always was against ltc apart from his personal gain. He is an early adopter of BTC, so he wants in on ltc. So much has been clear now. Him arguing for such a hardcoding-feature is yet another attack on ltc's future success. He's indeed a pychopath that gets busted again and again by the community, but isn't resting to make up ever new lies and attacks on people. Do you honestly believe anyone stills listens to what you have to say toward the security of Litecoin? Are you just insane? Nobody fucking cares for your ideas now, even if they weren't meant to destroy/hurt ltc. You're out of the game, the ltc train has long left without you. You lost. Get over it.