Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 04:48:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: I have an idea of game. But can't programmed.  (Read 2251 times)
cryptasm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 997
Merit: 1002


Gamdom.com


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2015, 06:14:34 PM
 #21

The problem I see with your Game is, that ppl cant Variante their houseedge or Double up, which makes dicing still the best game
1713977300
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713977300

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713977300
Reply with quote  #2

1713977300
Report to moderator
1713977300
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713977300

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713977300
Reply with quote  #2

1713977300
Report to moderator
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
cheekychap
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 26, 2015, 06:27:00 PM
 #22

It looks more like PVP with 5 people. Might be a wait, if no one turns up.

arvindr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 26, 2015, 06:29:22 PM
 #23

The house can rig the game imo. Since I am assuming,there would be something like multiple rooms. And in each room 5 positions. The house will almost everytime, know the winning position, even if they give you the hash.
They could sit a bot in that position, and when the rest of the seats get filled, they will winning all the time. The provably fair part to give no one the advantage will be difficult.

ndnh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005


New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit


View Profile
February 26, 2015, 08:08:06 PM
 #24

The edge is too high. People will run as soon as they know this.



Sorry for my bad english.

We have 5 players with the same bet (for example : 0,005 btc).

Every player chooses a different number from 1 to 5.
The player who falls on the number releases lost 100%.

The others 4 players wins 24.75% (4x24.75% = 99% payout).

The people who makes the game takes 1% (-fees of transaction to others players).

I don't want to make that game, it's just an idea.

Don't insult me thank you.  Grin

Fixed your %'s to make it an actually competitive idea.

Yeah, this is a far better version of the idea. Smiley
arvindr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 26, 2015, 08:21:37 PM
 #25

The edge is too high. People will run as soon as they know this.



Sorry for my bad english.

We have 5 players with the same bet (for example : 0,005 btc).

Every player chooses a different number from 1 to 5.
The player who falls on the number releases lost 100%.

The others 4 players wins 24.75% (4x24.75% = 99% payout).

The people who makes the game takes 1% (-fees of transaction to others players).

I don't want to make that game, it's just an idea.

Don't insult me thank you.  Grin

Fixed your %'s to make it an actually competitive idea.

Yeah, this is a far better version of the idea. Smiley

Seems the op was just to explain the game than throwing out the percentage for the house. The hourse would only be able to charge less than 2% , which is on;y what will justify it.

ndnh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005


New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit


View Profile
February 26, 2015, 08:35:10 PM
 #26

The edge is too high. People will run as soon as they know this.



Sorry for my bad english.

We have 5 players with the same bet (for example : 0,005 btc).

Every player chooses a different number from 1 to 5.
The player who falls on the number releases lost 100%.

The others 4 players wins 24.75% (4x24.75% = 99% payout).

The people who makes the game takes 1% (-fees of transaction to others players).

I don't want to make that game, it's just an idea.

Don't insult me thank you.  Grin

Fixed your %'s to make it an actually competitive idea.

Yeah, this is a far better version of the idea. Smiley

Seems the op was just to explain the game than throwing out the percentage for the house. The hourse would only be able to charge less than 2% , which is on;y what will justify it.

Well, there are two limitations with the concept.
1) players don't like waiting for other players.
Which could be solved by making it player vs site.
2) Odds are fixed.

If we fix these two, it will either become a dice(fixing both)} or a lottery (that increases win amount with multiple players)(fixing 2)

The only advantage over those two is the house will earn a fixed fee.
Shadow_Runner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 26, 2015, 09:02:15 PM
 #27

Sorry for my bad english.

We have 5 players with the same bet (for example : 0,005 btc).

Every player chooses a different number from 1 to 5.
The player who falls on the number releases lost 100%.

The others 4 players wins 20% (4x20% = 80%).

The people who makes the game takes 20% (-fees of transaction to others players).

I don't want to make that game, it's just an idea.

Don't insult me thank you.  Grin

And when 4 players choose the same number, what's next? Smiley
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!